tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post3964366411348564553..comments2024-02-29T00:46:38.800-08:00Comments on Washingtons Blog: Given Everything That's Happened, Shouldn't We At Least ASK?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-21601635285345097922010-11-29T16:12:01.071-08:002010-11-29T16:12:01.071-08:00Canadian police admit agents posed as protesters
h...Canadian police admit agents posed as protesters<br />http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/249291<br /><br />Human medical experimentation in the U.S.<br />http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.htmlThe Enforcerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02559664524818506467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-68040364880396546402010-03-01T15:26:13.024-08:002010-03-01T15:26:13.024-08:00I THINK THERE SHOULD NOT BE WAR
THOUSANDS OF PEOP...I THINK THERE SHOULD NOT BE WAR <br />THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE IN WAR<br />WE NEED PEACE!hayleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-31916578216084706662010-01-10T20:40:22.298-08:002010-01-10T20:40:22.298-08:00I noticed three highly dubious historical referenc...I noticed three highly dubious historical references in this little essay.<br /><br />1. The author misspells <b>Adolf</b> Hitler’s name and attributes to him a fabricated quote. The quote is cobbled together from two sentences in Hermann Rauschning’s <i>The Voice of Destruction.</i> Here are the original sentences in Rauschning, p. 84, wherein the word “terrorism” doesn’t even appear:<br /><br /><b>"Terror is the most effective political instrument</b>. [Six intervening sentences ommitted; the quote fabricator added the words "for nothing drives people harder than" here.] The important thing is the <b>sudden</b> shock of an overwhelming <b>fear of death.</b>"<br /><br />Rauschning's conversations with Hitler never occurred. The quotes in Rauschning were already fake before Frank Capra's screenwriters mangled them to create even more incriminating statements. The fake quote that the author presents here is typical. You can compare it with two fake Hitler quotes from <i>Why We Fight</i> that I exposed here: http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2008/12/egregious-example-of-allied-propaganda.html <br /><br />2. The author refers to “Operation Himmler” as an alleged example of a false-flag attack. <br /><br />“Operation Himmler” is a far-fetched story that depends entirely on the testimony of one man at Nuremberg, where a number of witnesses (most notably Rudolf Hoess) made false confessions under duress. <br /><br />Alfred Naujocks’ claim is that he led convicts dressed in Polish uniforms in a pretend attack on the German radio station at Gleiwitz. Those convicts were all allegedly killed in the attack. The story is preposterous on its face, for a number of reasons.<br /><br />There were 21 such cross-border attacks by the Poles. Naujocks’ story, if you believe it, only accounts for one of them.<br /><br />How would the sudden disappearance of that large number of convicts (German citizens) have been explained to their families?<br /><br />Naujocks had been under consideration for prosecution as a possible war criminal, and he might have been hanged, but after telling this ridiculous story he lived as a free man. And you don’t think there was some kind of deal made? <br /><br />I do not think that “Operation Himmler” is a credible story at all.<br /><br />3. The author claims that a program on the ludicrous History Channel has “persuasively argued” that members of the NSDAP set fire to the Reichstag in 1933. <br /><br />I guess it’s “persuasive” for somebody eager to be persuaded.<br /><br />The German police apprehended on the scene of the Reichstag Fire a Dutch Marxist named Marinus van der Lubbe. He confessed to the crime, and was executed. The History Channel video fails to mention that four other Communist defendants in the trial were cleared. If it had really been a strongly biased process you would expect most of them to have been convicted.<br /><br />The main argument that the History Channel presents against Marinus van der Lubbe’s guilt is that he had poor eyesight. Do you really find that persuasive as an argument that he couldn’t climb into a window and set fires?<br /><br />Another argument is that the day after the arrest the police were told to stop looking for suspects. So? This is strange behavior, to stop looking for suspects when you believe that you have your culprit?<br /><br />Arthur Koestler was a Communist at the time and he admitted that the story that the NSDAP was responsible for the fire was invented by the Communists and had no basis in evidence. All that the History Channel offers to prop up this old canard is innuendo.<br /><br />I am probably wasting my time saying this, but try to be a little more careful about your historical references. While it is true that those whole fail to learn from History are condemned to repeat it, it's also true that those who have learned false history have learned nothing.Haddinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04201445068897668725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-61072539130975791232010-01-06T17:00:50.159-08:002010-01-06T17:00:50.159-08:00I believe "Old South" is suffering from ...I believe "Old South" is suffering from a case of cognitive dissonance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-74116455224055625482010-01-06T14:01:19.262-08:002010-01-06T14:01:19.262-08:00As far as a massive cover-up and mumness of large ...As far as a massive cover-up and mumness of large numbers, I say three words; The Manhatten Project. These things along with compartmentalization, as well as threats of "suicide" if someone connects the dots makes these other conspiracies (which would involve far less than that "project") not such a far reach!Bigbirdnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-10552544198563731632010-01-06T12:44:35.912-08:002010-01-06T12:44:35.912-08:00and don't forget about 9/11:
http://georgewash...and don't forget about 9/11:<br />http://georgewashington.blogspot.comErik Larsonhttp://911reports.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-3371247193317111292010-01-06T06:15:42.937-08:002010-01-06T06:15:42.937-08:00Governments and elites have every conceivable tool...Governments and elites have every conceivable tool at their disposal to perpetrate any act they wish to get unintelligent citizens to give support. Only a handful of intelligent people are able to see through the disguise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-21818747958201386212010-01-05T22:41:39.586-08:002010-01-05T22:41:39.586-08:00HEY OL SOUTH EVER HEAR OF THE MANHATTEN PROJECT !!...HEY OL SOUTH EVER HEAR OF THE MANHATTEN PROJECT !!??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-37718437889377615612010-01-05T20:48:33.236-08:002010-01-05T20:48:33.236-08:00the pharasee's are very busythe pharasee's are very busyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-62633021471970549802010-01-05T15:37:16.423-08:002010-01-05T15:37:16.423-08:00Old South uses the logical fallacy sometimes calle...Old South uses the logical fallacy sometimes called the "argument from personal incredulity" to ignore a well documented historical fact; large scale government sponsored conspiracies do exist. They can be kept secret enough to at least maintain plausible deniability **. The mechanisms for doing this are numerous, but well documented. <br /><br />Ignore "old South" and his ill-informed opinion and go read the links so carefully provided by George Washington. Google "false flag". <br /><br />Please, do some study.<br /><br />* See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance#Argument_from_personal_incredulity<br /><br />** See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniabilityMike Zimmerhttp://www.theprogressivemind.infonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-68513035892346237962010-01-05T14:04:35.572-08:002010-01-05T14:04:35.572-08:00to "old south"--
no, not necessarily; t...to "old south"--<br /><br />no, not necessarily; that is why "operatives" and "contractors" are used.<br /><br />They ask no questions.<br /><br />It's very highly possible using 'hired guns'--<br /><br />and there are many 'hired guns' in the world.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-29099991462795629352010-01-05T13:30:34.453-08:002010-01-05T13:30:34.453-08:00Very interesting article and this article ties int...Very interesting article and this article ties into what I was talking with a friend about.<br />What if the two failed attempts to bomb an airliner, 1st the shoe bomber and 2nd the flight to Detroit, were given fake or bombs that would not detonate to keep the people scared so they (the government) can take away more of our rights?Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03960916175183129709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-21710185685344049252010-01-05T13:18:50.088-08:002010-01-05T13:18:50.088-08:00You must get the video movie,"HORSE FEATHERS&...You must get the video movie,"HORSE FEATHERS" staring Grocho Marx. Mr. Marx plays the role of a dictator. Other countries beg for peace,but Groucho says, HORSE FEATHERS. This is an attack and then starts a big war! Horse Feathers is a movie you do not want to miss. But hurry as most american lbraries are taking the video off the shelf. p s. the pop corn is extra,but you would chock on it anyway as you see how goverment gets us into war!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-73955106132813381922010-01-05T12:28:26.994-08:002010-01-05T12:28:26.994-08:00Time to pull back the curtian and "mention&qu...Time to pull back the curtian and "mention" that 911 would seem to fall in this catagory. Are we to blind (afraid) to concede the historical parallells here?Krendalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-61555934060288369002010-01-05T10:05:52.396-08:002010-01-05T10:05:52.396-08:00old south doesn't think hundreds could conspir...old south doesn't think hundreds could conspire together? funny but 535 congressmen all seem to vote for a spending bill that includes pay raises for theirselvesUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15054903279841121673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-2745614934322988962010-01-05T09:50:26.598-08:002010-01-05T09:50:26.598-08:00Old south check this out:
http://www.newworldord...Old south check this out:<br /><br />http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Articles/tabid/266/ID/980/33-Conspiracy-Theories-That-Turned-Out-To-Be-True-What-Every-Person-Should-Know.aspx<br /><br />Conspiracies don't require as many evil people as you might think. So many sheep do what they're told and never ask why, never even think to ask why.<br /><br />DaveSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-4188116083233335632010-01-05T09:03:32.340-08:002010-01-05T09:03:32.340-08:00Excellent article. The link to "conducted a w...Excellent article. The link to "conducted a wave of bombings....." leads to the website, but not the article itself. Thought I'd let you know. The rest was mind blowing!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-49948284444796485132010-01-05T04:39:11.482-08:002010-01-05T04:39:11.482-08:00Reminds me of Star Wars movies, the one where Quee...Reminds me of Star Wars movies, the one where Queen Amidala said, "So this is how liberty dies... in thunderous applause,"<br /><br />Life mimicking our imagination or is it the other way round?<br /><br />I always find it useful to think about issues by telling myself that there's always at least 2 sides of the coin... <br /><br />Good questions, really appreciate the thought provoking perspectives... also makes me wonder if there is truth, or is it just evident after the event happens? Sometimes, the truth can be obscured for thousands of years (archaeology)...<br /><br />Maybe govts should just shut up and let people of each country mingle around by themselves...OKLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02690110575860903343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-74928440906992350002010-01-04T18:45:58.291-08:002010-01-04T18:45:58.291-08:00It is a fair question, because in an open society,...It is a fair question, because in an open society, questions should always be asked.<br /><br />However, the staging of a large attack by our government against our own citizenry would require the coordinated efforts, and strict silence of dozens, if not hundreds of people, who would to some extent know the consequences of their actions. <br /><br />I would think it unlikely, for that single reason.<br />Can that many trustable amoral monsters be gathered into one tent, and have all maintain silence and complicity?<br /><br />It just does not seem likely--not impossible, by any means, but not likely.<br /><br />Thanks, however, for asking the questions!! You invested some major time and energy into this essay, and it is appreciated.OldSouthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01381229263357074199noreply@blogger.com