tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post4309009971297467904..comments2024-02-29T00:46:38.800-08:00Comments on Washingtons Blog: World Health Organization Says Cellphones Cause Cancer ... Oh, And They're Killing Off the Bees As WellUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-91878555316730147982011-06-02T10:18:03.510-07:002011-06-02T10:18:03.510-07:00I will suspend my judgment on the studies linking ...I will suspend my judgment on the studies linking microwave radiation from cell phones to brain cancer, although I believe that this is the same nonsense as the fabricated magnetic field dangers from high-voltage lines was earlier. In any case, the following two paragraphs are nonsense.<br /><br />--> The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing. It is not like an X-ray, but more like a very low-powered microwave oven.<br /><br />--> "What microwave radiation does in most simplistic terms is similar to what happens to food in microwaves, essentially cooking the brain," Black said. "So in addition to leading to a development of cancer and tumors, there could be a whole host of other effects like cognitive memory function, since the memory temporal lobes are where we hold our cell phones."<br /><br />That's a bit like calling visible light reflected by any object a low-powered conventional oven -- basically cooking us. The problem's even worse if microwave ovens are tuned to resonant frequencies of water (which may not be the case).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-43476370191615154922011-06-01T06:11:42.171-07:002011-06-01T06:11:42.171-07:00ever wondered how much radiation your phone emits ...ever wondered how much radiation your phone emits ?<br />every phone soled in the us and approved by the FCC has a Radiation Value for head and body<br />known as S.A.R (Specific Absorption Rate) <br />you can find this data and more by searching the free database <br />at <a href="http://cellphones-radiation-ratings.com/" rel="nofollow">cellphones-radiation-ratings.com </a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-49191067564862981342011-05-31T22:52:42.017-07:002011-05-31T22:52:42.017-07:00Faraday cages can be part of the fabric of a build...Faraday cages can be part of the fabric of a building and perhaps should be if we continue these experiments with EM radiation. You neglect talking to submarines, OTH radar and HAARP. <br /><br />Then again, by far the largest source is the Sun! It is a variable star, but constant, relatively, in visible light. Solar variability is worsening and the parallels with stock prices etc, (before plunge protection teams!) is widely known. <br /><br />EM is largely beneficial, but certain frequencies are sensitive as they resonate with "natural" systems that are used by living creatures. As we remain stubbornly uninterested in our EM nature, we are destined to foul up!<br /><br />Oliver Heaviside "simplified" the Clerk-Maxwell equations as they were too dangerous, as shown by Tesla. Censorship in science is not new.Fungus the Photo!https://www.blogger.com/profile/14879977479841544025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-33390922034698769312011-05-31T13:24:18.213-07:002011-05-31T13:24:18.213-07:00I wonder if this same phenomenon applies to a lapt...I wonder if this same phenomenon applies to a laptop on a person's lap? Same or similar radio frequencies there??Orangutan.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08952704332064506070noreply@blogger.com