tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post8976380020779214802..comments2024-02-29T00:46:38.800-08:00Comments on Washingtons Blog: South Korea Fired the First ShotUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-42588867194851277772010-11-30T03:07:21.012-08:002010-11-30T03:07:21.012-08:00Several days ago I heard an NPR story state that S...Several days ago I heard an NPR story state that South Korea not only shot the first shots into the disputed sea, but they also shot the first shots onto land in North Korea. Can someone help me find that NPR story? <br /><br />I was driving at the time and couldn't make a note of the show name.Mark Welschhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14153409776818891329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-27974585843567443852010-11-26T13:16:41.557-08:002010-11-26T13:16:41.557-08:00South Korea's president is incompetent
He tr...South Korea's president is incompetent <br /><br />He tried to sacrifice the Defense Minister for his mistakes.<br /><br />The current South Korean president precipitated these episodes of fighting on the Korean maritime border by repudiating the Declaration issued by South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun after meeting with Kim Jong Il on October 4, 2007.<br /><br />The Declaration stated:<br /><br /><br /><br />"The South and the North have agreed to create a ‘special peace and cooperation zone in the West Sea’ encompassing Haeju and vicinity in a bid to proactively push ahead with the creation of a joint fishing zone and maritime peace zone, establishment of a special economic zone, utilization of Haeju harbor, passage of civilian vessels via direct routes in Haeju and the joint use of the Han River estuary.” (Jon Van Dyke, “The Maritime boundary between North & South Korea in the Yellow (West) Sea,” 38 North, U.S.-Korea Institute Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, July 29, 2010. Online at: www.38north.org/?p=1232. )<br /><br />The maritime northern limit line was drawn unilaterally in 1953 by the US, was not a part of the Armistice and is generally considered to be incompatible with general principles of the law of maritime borders.teouihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15497132662232687690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-30583523880569968892010-11-24T01:00:15.684-08:002010-11-24T01:00:15.684-08:00Military exercises directly adjacent to the border...Military exercises directly adjacent to the border in such a politically charged part of the world seems highly provactive to me. <br /><br />Surely both sides can agree to a nice wide 'no excercises' zone and stick to it out of a mutual desire for survival?Syd Walkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08575806747240913926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-15971587222876076512010-11-23T14:27:11.102-08:002010-11-23T14:27:11.102-08:00The key word is "disputed territory." Th...The key word is "disputed territory." The two countries have never agreed on the exact boundaries of their armistice line in the waters. S.Korea believed its drills were in its own part of the sea.wataruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10934449228000680775noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-61201913159814784392010-11-23T11:53:16.900-08:002010-11-23T11:53:16.900-08:00Oh Please # uno poster. The island belongs to nort...Oh Please # uno poster. The island belongs to north KOREA. I guess in your books--it's peachie AOK for Israel on a daily bases to bomb the crap out of palestine and when the PalsOFmine retelate--they are the bad guys. N.Koreans have suffered enough--please do tell us--what's it Uncle ScAM's business being in this area?geo1671https://www.blogger.com/profile/01552067031865016054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-67288349856039371252010-11-23T10:54:32.919-08:002010-11-23T10:54:32.919-08:00North Korea doesn't have any authority to dema...North Korea doesn't have any authority to demand South Korea stop live fire exercises within their own territory. That's a nonstarter from a law of armed conflict perspective.<br /><br />Even if there was some justification for the North Koreans taking action, which there wasn't, they are bound by the same law to take proportional response- killing people and destroying property is not the proportional response to this.<br /><br />While there are many examples of violations even on "our side", this one, barring some new information is not one of them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04490179400711329488noreply@blogger.com