tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post9150061807393230847..comments2024-02-29T00:46:38.800-08:00Comments on Washingtons Blog: Will BP Skip the Relief Well, Declare Mission Accomplished, and Abandon Ship Without Permanently Killing the Oil Leak?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-39596695409587838582010-08-13T13:02:29.697-07:002010-08-13T13:02:29.697-07:00Excellent work people! These articles hit on the m...Excellent work people! These articles hit on the major reasons for why the deception continues: the well is still leaking!<br />Reading this I can save hours of time watching the corporate media and still not know what's really happening.<br />Now we want to believe the best but like Gulf Coast inhabitants, we've reached a point where trust in BP/Fedgov's response has eroded. Lacking trust, we tend to disbelieve whatever we're told. In the way users of alternative media inoculate themselves from becoming indifferent "bored" sheople willing to wade into the myths and lies.<br />The burden of proof must lie with BP and Fedgov! They're responsible for this mess. As I've said now for some time, they'll get away with everything they can. Baring transmission of the facts, BP/Fedgov feels they can do whatever they want, spinning the response into whatever they want. The Two Well story is ample evidence of the scale of the spin job.<br />Now I do like ethel's comment because she supplies the facts about a fissure. The leaks continue but aren't constrained at the well head (which is supposedly capped if it's indeed the same well!) The idea of "spiderwebbing" is consistent with the force of the initial blowout and a fissure. Plus, variations in well head pressure that could be explained by variable quantities of oil seeping into/out of the rock formation.jbpeebleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11386620564536871255noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-52356520025981601952010-08-13T04:42:18.977-07:002010-08-13T04:42:18.977-07:00Seems to me they've decided it's no use be...Seems to me they've decided it's no use because it's obvious there are hugh leaks in the sea floor, have run out of options and know the relief wells won't work. Perhaps they have decided to use the relief wells to produce the reservoir to decrease the pressure and deplete the wells - but secretly - since our gov't over re-acted as usual and would look like fools to lift the moratorium after most of the rigs have left the GOM, and 100,000 jobs lost.<br /><br />Could be lots of reasons for contradictions.<br /><br /><br />FWIW if anything - Someone posted this elsewhere - and have read similar things from other sources:<br /><br />I will not reveal who no matter what. Take it for what it is, I assure this information is accurate.<br /><br />If you feel the need to raise the BS Flag, so be it. I won't battle you shills and nay-sayers any more.<br /><br />First time I heard from them in a while since the last time I posted.<br /><br />Apparently there is a huge fissure running parallel with the well. This fissure was purposely created to gain access to the reserve below. The drilled passage is not 100% steel pipe tip-to-tip. The last several hundred feet utilizes the fissure as the source.<br /><br />The fissure running parallel to the well is spider webbing near the surface. Where the steel pipe meets the fissure deep into the formation is eroded open. When the well is left open most of the pressure is released through the steel pipe. When the well is capped the pressure is surging oil outside the steel pipe and into the rock formation.<br /><br />But it isn't so black and white. There is still oil being pushed through the formation when the well is open. This is why the BOP was opened up at the top, hoping to prevent the oil from spreading in the rock formation.<br /><br />The fissure that runs parallel to the well severely complicates any use of explosives to pinch the well shut, including nuclear explosions.<br /><br />At the present time there is no real solution to the issue.<br /><br />Any use of nuclear explosions could easily spread the fissure from the reserve to the sea floor and cause a blow out so massive it will dwarf any natural disaster known to man so far.<br /><br />Primarily they are mapping the formation below in greater details to aid in designing a solution.<br /><br />In short, they don't have a solid planned solution yet.<br /><br />And he/she still highly recommends NO TRAVELING this summer.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04138577179367883288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-91200030778106732512010-08-12T21:42:31.167-07:002010-08-12T21:42:31.167-07:00The entire "killing" of the well is a ch...The entire "killing" of the well is a charade, a distraction. We're not being shown on TV the well that exploded, killing 11 on Deepwater Horizon. What we are being shown is the "Well A" that Transocean Marianas drilled, capped and abandoned in 2009, which lies approximately 250 away from "Well B" which blew out on April 20.<br /><br />Download the Initial Exploration Plan from MMS, in which BP filed to drill not one but two wells, one in 2009 and one in 2010. Note the coordinates of the two wells, then compare them to the coordinates onscreen from the ROVs that are on television. They are only showing you Well A.<br /><br />I contacted BP's press office and asked why we are being shown Well A when they were only licensed to drill at site B in 2010. A press officer responded that BP never got permission to drill Well B and that no equipment was thus installed there.<br /><br />Except it was -- I have found extremely rare videos on Youtube of the ROVs in front of Well B, which does not exist according to BP. It does exist, it was caught on their own cameras leaking. I have the videos. No one noticed the deception because the two wells are identical in appearance. The only way to tell which you are looking at is to compare the coordinates on the TV screen to the coordinates in the drilling plan.<br /><br />99.999% of all the video shown on TV and those available on Youtube show Well A. I found several that clearly show that there is a second well at site B and that it was leaking too. Probably it still is but we don't know. BP forgot to cut the live public feeds a handful of times when they were supposed to be secretly surveying Well B. Finding the videos was literally like sifting through the haystack of Youtube to find needles, but did.<br /><br />Read the whole story if you care to on my dumb blog that no one ever reads. It's all there with the videos embedded, still captures from the screens right next to pictures of the Exploration Plan explaining where Wells A and B are, and the whole explanation of why this fraud is being perpetrated. It's a giant deception.<br /><br />http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/caught-on-camera-again-non-existent.html<br /><br />http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/gone-in-18-seconds-bps-lie-dismissed.htmlBanksterBuster777https://www.blogger.com/profile/05740358391629712628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-13844367673485579232010-08-12T13:10:56.658-07:002010-08-12T13:10:56.658-07:00It is a disgrace that more engineers have not writ...It is a disgrace that more engineers have not written in with comments and analysis. To you competent engineer bulder-machines out there. Your profession is being disgraced. These BP blokes have demonstrated what happens when the rules are not followed. This is your world too. These victims of this mess are your friends and countrymen. Study the testimonies and withholding of vital data and write in. The guys I worked with on jobsights did not take shit from anybody. WHY DO IT NOW? It will look good on your resume if you look at what these turkeys are doing and publicly call them on it. WE NEED HELP HERE! Matthew Simmons would attest to that. So would thousands of others who know what's up.Howard T Lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05570037630807929730noreply@blogger.com