tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-532468648407164642024-03-15T18:09:13.040-07:00Washingtons Blog@Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2486125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-52598854581906145022011-09-08T10:32:00.000-07:002011-09-08T10:34:42.972-07:00We've Moved!<p><br /></p><p>If you're reading this, it means you've been following the <a href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/">http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com</a> address. We switched over to WordPress, and from now on will only post at <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/">http://www.WashingtonsBlog.com</a>.<br /></p><p>The RSS feed for the new site is:<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/feed">http://www.washingtonsblog.com/feed</a></p><p>See you there ...<br /></p><p> </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-90770652004962511572011-09-07T11:01:00.000-07:002011-09-07T11:17:52.174-07:00New Website<p><br /></p><p>We're in the process of switching over to WordPress. Initially, the website may appear very minimalistic, as the old posts are imported.<br /></p><p>The old <a href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/">http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com</a> address will also no longer be used, and the rss feeds will change to the main site: <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/">http://www.WashingtonsBlog.com</a>. Once the switchover happens, please use <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/">http://www.WashingtonsBlog.com</a> for everything - it's easier to say and to remember - instead of <a href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/">http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com</a>.</p><p>Finally, because the SEO guru who is generously helping us with all of this is currently tinkering, we are currently locked out of posting at the new site. Bear with us ... it's a work in progress!<br /></p><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-65959375781862686042011-09-06T17:02:00.000-07:002011-09-06T23:48:11.822-07:00Covering the Leaking Reactors At Fukushima With Tents Will Only INCREASE Global Exposure to Radiation<p><br /></p><h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Will Be Spread By Use of Tents<br /></h3><p>When I first heard that Tepco will place large tents over its leaking Fukushima reactors, I reacted with derision, <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/japans-latest-proposal-contain-fukushimas-radioactive-fallout-circus-tent">as did Tyler Durden</a>:</p><p></p><blockquote><p>Artist's impression of this latest Japanese venture:</p> <p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/images/circus_tent.jpg"><img src="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/images/circus_tent.jpg" height="392" width="429" /></a></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/images/circus_tent.jpg"></a></p><p>My reaction a couple of weeks later - after seeing an actual artist's rendering of what the tents would actually look like - was hope that the tents would at least keep radiation from spreading worldwide through the air, even if they didn't do anything to prevent contamination of Japan's groundwater or the Pacific Ocean.<br /></p><p>But nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen <a href="http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/audio/IYLTP%20-%20Ep%20147.mp3">says</a> that the tents - while helping to protect workers at Fukushima - will actually <span style="font-style: italic;">increase</span> the dispersion of radioactive gases. Specifically, Tepco will pump radiation out through stacks, which will push radiation up to a higher elevation, dispersing it even further around the world.</p><p>Gundersen <a href="http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/?p=4952">says</a> that Fukushima is still emitting huge quantities of radiation.<br /></p> <h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">Burning Radioactive Materials Will Also Spread Radiation Globally<br /></h3><p>Along with the widespread Japanese practice of burning materials irradiated by Fukushima - which is <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/nuclear-expert-because-japanese-are.html">sending another wave or radiation worldwide</a> - the tents and stacks will only worsen the global exposure to Fukushima's radiation.<br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-81180090346037815332011-09-05T13:51:00.001-07:002011-09-06T08:41:40.512-07:00There Are More Slaves Today Than At Any Point In Human History<p><br /></p><h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">More Slaves Today Than Ever Before In History<br /></h3><p>You would assume that - as messed up as things may be today - at least there is not widespread slavery, as in ancient Egypt or the American south.</p><p>But as Time Magazine <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1952335,00.html">noted</a> last year:</p><p></p><blockquote>Despite more than a dozen international conventions banning slavery in the past 150 years, <span style="font-weight: bold;">there are more slaves today than at any point in human history</span>. Slaves are those forced to perform services for no pay beyond subsistence and for the profit of others who hold them through fraud and violence. While most are held in debt bondage in the poorest regions of South Asia, some are trafficked in the midst of thriving development. </blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">To help fight slavery, </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/03/real-christians-fight-against-injustice.html">read this</a><span style="font-style: italic;"> and - more importantly - <a href="http://www.ijm.org/">get involved here</a>.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">And given that there are some who would like to <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/09/labor-serfs-day.html">put all of us in debt peonage</a></span>, <span style="font-style: italic;">we should stand up for freedom and justice whenever and wherever we can. </span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-88381574018611338202011-09-05T10:13:00.000-07:002011-09-05T10:23:40.014-07:00Despite The Ongoing Efforts To Cover Up The Scope Of The Disasters, New Videos Prove That All Is Not Well At Fukushima ... Or The BP Oil Spill Site<p><br /></p><p>Despite the <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/japans-nuclear-melt-down-economic.html">ongoing efforts to cover up</a> the scope of the disasters, new videos prove that all is not well in Fukushima ... or the BP oil spill site.<br /></p><p>A strange flash was observed at the Fukushima nuclear power plant:</p><p></p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kaUI4Ujzze0" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="412" width="510"></iframe></center><p></p><p>And a new <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/new-evidence-of-a-massive-oil-slick-near-deepwater-horizon-site/">10-mile oil slick</a> was spotted in the area of BP gulf oil spill:</p><p></p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mlWKptW74CY" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="316" width="510"></iframe></center><br /><p></p><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-12681199078851195702011-09-04T10:02:00.001-07:002011-09-05T00:28:27.389-07:00Labor Day Has Been Rendered Completely Meaningless (Happy Serf Day)<h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">
<br /></h3><h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">Labor Day ... Or Serf Day?</h3>As I <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2008/09/what-time-is-it.html">noted</a> in 2008:<p></p><blockquote><p>A highly-regarded economist (Michael Hudson, Distinguished Research Professor at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, who has advised the U.S., Canadian, Mexican and Latvian governments as well as the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, and who is a former Wall Street economist at Chase Manhattan Bank who also helped establish the world’s first sovereign debt fund) <a href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3702.shtml">said</a>:</p><blockquote>"You have to realize that what they’re trying to do is to roll back the Enlightenment, roll back the moral philosophy and social values of classical political economy and its culmination in Progressive Era legislation, as well as the New Deal institutions. They’re not trying to make the economy more equal, and they’re not trying to share power. Their greed is (as Aristotle noted) infinite. So what you find to be a violation of traditional values is a re-assertion of <span style="font-weight: bold;">pre-industrial, feudal values. The economy is being set back on the road to debt peonage. </span>The Road to Serfdom is not government sponsorship of economic progress and rising living standards, it’s the dismantling of government, the dissolution of regulatory agencies, to create a new feudal-type elite."</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote><p>In 2009, Foreign Policy magazine ran an article entitled "<span class="title"><a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4850">The Next Big Thing: Neomedievalism</a>", arguing that the power of nations is declining, and being replaced by corporations, wealthy individuals, the sovereign wealth funds of monarchs, and </span>city-regions<span class="title">.</span></p><h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">The Government Continues to Destroy Jobs ... Not Create Them </h3><p>Despite pretty words and psuedo-jobs programs, government policy is <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/of-course-unemployment-is-rising.html">unrelentingly destroying American jobs</a> - instead of creating them - by:</p><ul><li>Encouraging companies to ship them abroad
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Sending a large percentage of the funds for bailed out banks abroad
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Encouraging mergers</li></ul><ul><li>Paying banks to park their excess reserves, instead of deploying them as new loans to Main Street
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Encouraging redistribution of wealth upwards to the top .1% wealthiest
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Enacting policies which (1) turn a blind eye to Wall Street fraud, (2) prop up the too big to fail banks, asset prices and leverage at any cost, and (3) spend stimulus money on the military and huge Wall Street firms, instead of on average Americans
<br /></li></ul>(And no, <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/09/johnson-barack-obama-like-louis-xiv.html">Obama is not being misadvised</a>; he simply has <a href="http://www.washingtons.blog.com/2011/04/jobs-bill-government-passed-jobs-bill.html">different priorities from the average American</a>).
<br /><h3 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">Labor Day Has Been Rendered Completely Meaningless
<br /></h3><p style="text-align: justify;">As Mark Provost has <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/why-rich-love-high-unemployment.html">points out</a> - the rich <span style="font-style: italic;">love </span>high unemployment. Because all branches of government and the Federal Reserve are <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/06/well-theres-your-problem-right-there.html">wholly captured</a> by the top .1% (and see <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/weve-gone-from-nation-of-laws-to-nation.html">this</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/04/banana-republic-with-no-bananas.html">this</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/03/82-of-americans-clamp-down-on-wall.html">this</a>), they are not very motivated to decrease unemployment.</p>And as David Rosenberg <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/attention-marxists-labors-share-national-income-drops-lowest-history">notes</a>:<blockquote>The "labor share of national income has fallen to its lower level in modern history ... some recovery it has been - a recovery in which labor's share of the spoils has declined to unprecedented levels." </blockquote>Indeed, the government has made it <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/theres-no-recovery-because-government.html">official policy to protect the fat cats</a> instead of helping the little guy. <p>Due to Americans' passivity in the face of <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-21/wall-street-aristocracy-got-1-2-trillion-in-fed-s-secret-loans.html??">those who act like lords</a>, Labor Day has been rendered completely meaningless. </p>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-56687603063379490542011-09-03T23:21:00.000-07:002011-09-03T23:43:36.925-07:00When the Rich Get Richer, It DOESN'T Raise All Boats ... It SINKS The Standard of Living For Everyone Else
<br />I've repeatedly <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/economy-cannot-recover-as-long-as.html">noted</a> that rampant inequality destabilizes the economy as a whole, and actually <span style="font-style: italic;">causes </span>depressions ... but that government policy is <span style="font-style: italic;">increasing </span>inequality.
<br />
<br />I've also pointed out that no one - liberal <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/02/its-myth-that-conservatives-accept.html">or conservative</a> - likes runaway inequality.
<br />
<br />Now, Jeffrey P. Thompson (Assistant Research Professor at the Political Economy Research Institute of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst) and Elias Leight (Assistant Analyst Tax Analysis Division of the Congressional Budget Office) have demonstrated that <a href="http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_251-300/WP258.pdf">when the wealthiest Americans get richer, <span style="font-style: italic;">everyone else</span> becomes poorer</a>.
<br />
<br />For example, they demonstrate that when the wealthiest Americans get 10% richer, middle income Americans get 2% <span style="font-style: italic;">poorer</span>.
<br />
<br /><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TAGFVU9lSXY" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="316" width="510"></iframe></center>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-68649638759763797252011-09-03T22:59:00.000-07:002011-09-03T23:15:08.768-07:00Back In The Saddle<p>
<br /></p><p>I'm back from a week-long vacation with my family. Thanks to the wonderful guest posters for their great reporting.</p><p>We'll make guest posting a regular part of Washington's Blog, and we'll also get back to writing ourselves.
<br /></p><p>
<br /></p><p>
<br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-3698852845968871822011-09-03T14:39:00.000-07:002011-09-03T14:50:33.162-07:00Full-Blown Civil War Erupts On Wall Street: As Reality Finally Hits The Financial Elite, They Start Turning On Each OtherBy David DeGraw, <a href="http://ampedstatus.com/">AmpedStatus.com</a>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://ampedstatus.com/images/civil-war-wall-street1.jpg" alt="Full-Blown Civil War Erupts On Wall Street: As Reality Finally Hits The Financial Elite, They Turn On Each Other" align="right" />Finally, after trillions in fraudulent activity, trillions in bailouts, trillions in printed money, billions in political bribing and billions in bonuses, the criminal cartel members on Wall Street are beginning to get what they deserve. As the Eurozone is coming apart at the seams and as the US economy grinds to a halt, the financial elite are starting to turn on each other. The lawsuits are piling up fast. Here's an extensive roundup:
<br />
<br />As I reported <a href="http://daviddegraw.org/2011/08/collapse-roundup-5-goliath-on-the-ropes-big-banks-getting-hit-hard-its-a-bloodbath-as-wall-streets-crimes-blow-up-in-their-face/">last week</a>:
<br /><blockquote>Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, It's A "Bloodbath" As Wall Street's Crimes Blow Up In Their Face
<br />
<br />Time to put your Big Bank <em>shorts</em> on! Get ready for a <em>run</em>... The chickens are coming home to roost... The Global Banking Cartel's crimes are being exposed left & right... Prepare for Shock & Awe...</blockquote>Well, well... here's your Shock & Awe:
<br />
<br />First up, this shockingly huge $196 billion lawsuit just filed against 17 major banks on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bank of America is severely exposed on this lawsuit. As the parent company of Countrywide and Merrill Lynch they are on the hook for $57.4 billion. JP Morgan is next in the line of fire with $33 billion. And many death spiraling European banks are facing billions in losses as well.
<br />
<br /><strong>FHA Files a $196 Billion Lawsuit Against 17 Banks </strong>
<br /><blockquote>The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises), today filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to the Enterprises.
<br />
<br />Complaints have been filed against the following lead defendants, in alphabetical order:
<br />
<br />1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC - $6 billion
<br />2. Bank of America Corporation - $6 billion
<br />3. Barclays Bank PLC - $4.9 billion
<br />4. Citigroup, Inc. - $3.5 billion
<br />5. Countrywide Financial Corporation -$26.6 billion
<br />6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc. - $14.1 billion
<br />7. Deutsche Bank AG - $14.2 billion
<br />8. First Horizon National Corporation - $883 million
<br />9. General Electric Company - $549 million
<br />10. Goldman Sachs & Co. - $11.1 billion
<br />11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. - $6.2 billion
<br />12. JPMorgan Chase & Co. - $33 billion
<br />13. Merrill Lynch & Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp. - $24.8 billion
<br />14. Morgan Stanley - $10.6 billion
<br />15. Nomura Holding America Inc. - $2 billion
<br />16. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC - $30.4 billion
<br />17. Société Générale - $1.3 billion
<br />
<br />These complaints were filed in federal or state court in New York or the federal court in Connecticut. The complaints seek damages and civil penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, similar in content to the complaint FHFA filed against UBS Americas, Inc. on July 27, 2011. In addition, each complaint seeks compensatory damages for negligent misrepresentation. Certain complaints also allege state securities law violations or common law fraud. [<a href="http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/22599/PLSLitigation_final_090211.pdf">read full FHFA release</a>]</blockquote>You can read the suits filed against each <a href="http://www.fhfa.gov/Default.aspx?Page=110">individual bank here</a>. For some more information read Bloomberg: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-03/jpmorgan-bofa-among-17-banks-sued-by-fhfa-over-196-billion-in-securities.html">BofA, JPMorgan Among 17 Banks Sued by U.S. for $196 Billion</a>. Noticeably absent from the list of companies being sued is Wells Fargo.
<br />
<br />And the suits just keep coming...
<br />
<br /><strong>BofA sued over $1.75 billion Countrywide mortgage pool</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) was sued by the trustee of a $1.75 billion mortgage pool, which seeks to force the bank to buy back the underlying loans because of alleged misrepresentations in how they were made. The lawsuit by the banking unit of US Bancorp (USB.N) is the latest of a number of suits seeking to recover investor losses tied to risky mortgage loans issued by Countrywide Financial Corp, which Bank of America bought in 2008. In a complaint filed in a New York state court in Manhattan, U.S. Bank said Countrywide, which issued the 4,484 loans in the HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-10, materially breached its obligations by systemically misrepresenting the quality of its underwriting and loan documentation. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/31/us-bankofamerica-usbancorp-idUSTRE77U08E20110831">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Bank of America kept AIG legal threat under wraps</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Top Bank of America Corp lawyers knew as early as January that American International Group Inc was prepared to sue the bank for more than $10 billion, seven months before the lawsuit was filed, according to sources familiar with the matter. Bank of America shares fell more than 20 percent on August 8, the day the lawsuit was filed, adding to worries about the stability of the largest U.S. bank.... The bank made no mention of the lawsuit threat in a quarterly regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission just four days earlier. Nor did management discuss it on conference calls about quarterly results and other pending legal claims. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/30/us-bankofamerica-lawsuits-idUSTRE77T47620110830">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Nevada Lawsuit Shows Bank of America’s Criminal Incompetence </strong>
<br /><blockquote>As we’ve stated before, litigation by attorney general is significant not merely due to the damages and remedies sought, but because it paves the way for private lawsuits. And make no mistake about it, this filing is a doozy. It shows the Federal/state attorney general mortgage settlement effort to be a complete travesty. The claim describes, in considerable detail, how various Bank of America units engaged in misconduct in virtually every aspect of its residential mortgage business. [<a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/nevada-lawsuit-shows-bank-of-americas-criminal-incompetent.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Nevada Wallops Bank of America With Sweeping Suit; Nationwide Foreclosure Settlement in Peril</strong>
<br /><blockquote>The sweeping new suit could have repercussions far beyond Nevada's borders. It further jeopardizes a possible nationwide settlement with the five largest U.S. banks over their foreclosure practices, especially given concerns voiced by other attorneys general, New York's foremost among them.... In a statement, Bank of America spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens said reaching a settlement would bring a better outcome for homeowners than litigation. "We believe that the best way to get the housing market going again in every state is a global settlement that addresses these issues fairly, comprehensively and with finality. [<a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/nevada-slams-bank-of-america-with-sweeping-suit-nation-wide-foreclosure-set">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>FDIC Objects to Bank of America’s $8.5 Billion Mortgage-Bond Accord</strong>
<br /><blockquote>The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is objecting to Bank of America Corp. (BAC)’s proposed $8.5 billion mortgage-bond settlement with investors, joining investors and states that are challenging the agreement. The FDIC owns securities covered by the settlement and said it doesn’t have enough information to evaluate the accord, according to a filing today in federal court in Manhattan. Bank of America has agreed to pay $8.5 billion to resolve claims from investors in Countrywide Financial mortgage bonds. The settlement was negotiated with a group of institutional investors and would apply to investors outside that group. [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-29/fdic-objects-to-bank-of-america-s-proposed-8-5-billion-mortgage-bond-pact.html">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Fed asks Bank of America to list contingency plan: report</strong>
<br /><blockquote>The Federal Reserve has asked Bank of America Corp to show what measures it could take if business conditions worsen, the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the situation. BofA executives recently responded to the unusual request from the Federal Reserve with a list of options that includes the issuance of a separate class of shares tied to the performance of its Merrill Lynch securities unit, the people told the paper. Bank of America and the Fed declined to comment to the Journal. Both could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters outside regular U.S. business hours. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/02/us-bofa-fed-idUSTRE7811EQ20110902">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Bombshell Admission of Failed Securitization Process in American Home Mortgage Servicing/LPS Lawsuit </strong>
<br /><blockquote>Wow, Jones Day just created a huge mess for its client and banks generally if anyone is alert enough to act on it. The lawsuit in question is American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. v Lender Processing Services. It hasn’t gotten all that much attention (unless you are on the LPS deathwatch beat) because to most, it looks like yet another beauty contest between Cinderella’s two ugly sisters. AHMSI is a servicer (the successor to Option One, and it may also still have some Ameriquest servicing).
<br />
<br />AHMSI is mad at LPS because LPS was supposed to prepare certain types of documentation AHMSI used in foreclosures. AHMSI authorized the use of certain designated staffers signing with the authority of AHSI (what we call robosinging, since the people signing these documents didn’t have personal knowledge, which is required if any of the documents were affidavits). But it did not authorize the use of surrogate signers, which were (I kid you not) people hired to forge the signatures of robosigners. The lawsuit rather matter of factly makes a stunning admission... [<a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/bombshell-admission-of-failed-securitization-process-in-american-home-mortgage-servicinglps-lawsuit.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Fraudclosure: MERS Case Filed With Supreme Court</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Before readers get worried by virtue of the headline that the Supreme Court will use its magic legal wand to make the dubious MERS mortgage registry system viable, consider the following:
<br />
<br />1. The Supreme Court hears only a very small portion of the cases filed with it, and is less likely to take one with these demographics (filed by a private party, and an appeal out of a state court system, as opposed to Federal court). This case, Gomes v. Countywide, was decided against the plaintiff in lower and appellate court and the California state supreme court declined to hear it
<br />
<br />2. If MERS or the various servicers who have had foreclosures overturned based on challenges to MERS thought they’d get a sympathetic hearing at the Supreme Court, they probably would have filed some time ago. MERS have apparently been settling cases rather than pursue ones where it though the judge would issue an unfavorable precedent
<br />
<br />3. The case in question, from what the experts I consulted with and I can tell, is not the sort the Supreme Court would intervene in based on the issue raised, which is due process (14th Amendment). But none of us have seen the underlying lower and appellate court cases, and the summaries we’ve seen are unusually unclear as to what the legal argument is. [<a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/mers-case-filed-with-supreme-court.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Iowa Says State AG Accord Won’t Release Banks From Liability</strong>
<br /><blockquote>The 50-state attorney general group investigating mortgage foreclosure practices won’t release banks from all civil, or any criminal, liability in a settlement, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said. [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-02/iowa-s-miller-says-foreclosure-deal-won-t-release-banks-from-all-liability.html">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Fed Launches New Formal Enforcement Action Against Goldman Sachs To Review Foreclosure Practices</strong>
<br /><blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board has just launched a formal enforcement action against Goldman Sachs related to Litton Loan Services. Litton Loan is the nightmare-ridden mortgage servicing unit, a subsidiary of Goldman, that Goldman has been trying to sell for months. They penned a deal to recently, but the Fed stepped in and required Goldman to end robo-signing taking place at the unit before the sale could be completed. Sounds like this enforcement action is an extension of that requirement. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/fed-launches-new-formal-enforcement-action-against-goldman-sachs-to-review-foreclosure-practices-2011-9">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Goldman Sachs, Firms Agree With Regulator To End 'Robo-Signing' Foreclosure Practices</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Goldman Sachs and two other firms have agreed with the New York banking regulator to end the practice known as robo-signing, in which bank employees signed foreclosure documents without reviewing case files as required by law, the Wall Street Journal said. In an agreement with New York's financial-services superintendent, Goldman, its Litton Loan Servicing unit and Ocwen Financial Corp also agreed to scrutinize loan files for evidence they mishandled borrowers' paperwork and to cut mortgage payments for some New York homeowners, the Journal said. [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/01/goldman-sachs-robo-signing-regulator_n_944622.html">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>Banks still robo-signing, filing doubtful foreclosure documents</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Reuters has found that some of the biggest U.S. banks and other "loan servicers" continue to file questionable foreclosure documents with courts and county clerks. They are using tactics that late last year triggered an outcry, multiple investigations and temporary moratoriums on foreclosures. In recent months, servicers have filed thousands of documents that appear to have been fabricated or improperly altered, or have sworn to false facts. Reuters also identified at least six "robo-signers," individuals who in recent months have each signed thousands of mortgage assignments -- legal documents which pinpoint ownership of a property. These same individuals have been identified -- in depositions, court testimony or court rulings -- as previously having signed vast numbers of foreclosure documents that they never read or checked. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/19/foreclosure-banks-idUSL3E7IJ2IF20110719">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>JPMorgan fined for contravening Iran, Cuba sanctions</strong>
<br /><blockquote>JPMorgan Chase Bank has been fined $88.3 million for contravening US sanctions against regimes in Iran, Cuba and Sudan, and the former Liberian government, the US Treasury Department announced Thursday. The Treasury said that the bank had engaged in a number of "egregious" financial transfers, loans and other facilities involving those countries but, in announcing a settlement with the bank, said they were "apparent" violations of various sanctions regulations. [<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h2T9j2YWLDqLovl3bo2PZGl-1bKQ?docId=CNG.2c9a5880ea1cf072080ef3cacbb44f05.4b1">read more</a>]</blockquote><strong>This Is Considered Punishment? The Federal Reserve Wells Fargo Farce</strong>
<br /><blockquote>What made the news surprising, of course, was that the Federal Reserve has rarely, if ever, taken action against a bank for making predatory loans. Alan Greenspan, the former Fed chairman, didn’t believe in regulation and turned a blind eye to subprime abuses. His successor, Ben Bernanke, is not the ideologue that Greenspan is, but, as an institution, the Fed prefers to coddle banks rather than punish them.
<br />
<br />That the Fed would crack down on Wells Fargo would seem to suggest a long-overdue awakening. Yet, for anyone still hoping for justice in the wake of the financial crisis, the news was hardly encouraging. First, the Fed did not force Wells Fargo to admit guilt — and even let the company issue a press release blaming its wrongdoing on a “relatively small group.”
<br />
<br />The $85 million fine was a joke; in just the last quarter, Wells Fargo’s revenues exceeded $20 billion. And compensating borrowers isn’t going to hurt much either. By my calculation, it won’t top $20 million. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/opinion/26nocera.html?_r=2">read more</a>] </blockquote><strong>Exclusive: Regulators seek high-frequency trading secrets</strong>
<br /><blockquote>U.S. securities regulators have taken the unprecedented step of asking high-frequency trading firms to hand over the details of their trading strategies, and in some cases, their secret computer codes. The requests for proprietary code and algorithm parameters by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a Wall Street brokerage regulator, are part of investigations into suspicious market activity, said Tom Gira, executive vice president of FINRA's market regulation unit. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/01/us-financial-regulation-algos-idUSTRE7806J420110901">read more</a>]</blockquote>And here's part of the <a href="http://daviddegraw.org/2011/08/collapse-roundup-5-goliath-on-the-ropes-big-banks-getting-hit-hard-its-a-bloodbath-as-wall-streets-crimes-blow-up-in-their-face/">Collapse Roundup</a> I wrote on August 25th, referenced in the beginning of this report - as you will see, I would probably make a lot more money as an investment adviser:
<br />
<br /><span style="font-size:100%;"><strong>Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, It's A "Bloodbath" As Wall Street's Crimes Blow Up In Their Face </strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://ampedstatus.com/images/dead-cat-bounce.jpg" alt="Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their Face" align="right" />Time to put your Big Bank <em><a href="http://beginnersinvest.about.com/cs/newinvestors/a/022703a.htm">shorts</a></em> on! Get ready for a <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run">run</a></em>...
<br />
<br />The chickens are coming home to roost. Reality is catching up with the market riggers (Fed, ECB, PPT, CIA) and the "too big to fail" banks are getting whacked. Trillions of dollars in bailouts and legalized (FASB) accounting fraud cannot save these insolvent zombie banks any longer. The Grim Reaper is on the horizon and his sickle will do what paid off politicians won't, <em>cut 'em down to size</em>. So get your <a href="http://ampedstatus.org/time-to-fight-back-crash-jp-morgan-buy-silver/">silver stake</a> ready, time to <em>plunge</em> it into their vampire squid hearts....
<br />
<br />What about Warren Buffet? He saved Goldman Sachs with a bailout in 2008. Can he save Bank of America?...
<br />
<br />Warren’s bailout will help BofA over the short run, but $5 billion is just a drop in the bucket when it comes to their problems. The only thing his $5 billion will accomplish is a temporary run up in stock value so everyone who has been killed on the plummeting stock price can then jump out without complete loss....
<br />
<br />Trouble a-comin'...
<br />
<br /><strong>Goldman Sachs TANKS After CEO Lloyd Blankfein Hires Famous Defense Lawyer</strong>
<br />
<br /><blockquote><img src="http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/171-0307063022-suicide_banker.jpg" alt="Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their Face" width="200" align="right" />Is the Goldman Sachs CEO facing a new lawsuit?
<br />
<br />The market seems to think so. Goldman Sachs just tanked in minutes before the close after news that Lloyd Blankfein hired a lawyer famous for defending vilified execs. It's back up a bit since dropping over 5%, but the news is still concerning.
<br />
<br />It's unclear whether the lawyer is for him, Goldman Sachs, or both, but Goldman Sachs's CEO Lloyd Blankfein hired Reid Weingarten, a high profile defense attorney who says "I'm used to these monstrously difficult cases where everybody hates my clients," according to Reuters.
<br />
<br />Reuters says the hire might have something to do with accusations of Blankfein's committing perjury. Or something else:
<br />
<br />One former federal prosecutor, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said Blankfein may have hired outside counsel after receiving a request from investigators for documents or other information. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/blankfein-hires-weingarten-2011-8#ixzz1VyoKHbio">read full report</a>]</blockquote>Speaking of hiring lawyers...
<br />
<br /><strong>The Global Banking Cartel's Crimes Are Being Exposed Left & Right...
<br />
<br />Blowing Up In Their Face... Prepare for Shock & Awe...</strong>
<br />
<br /><strong>BOOM!</strong> Moody's exposed:
<br />
<br /><strong>MOODY'S ANALYST BREAKS SILENCE: Says Ratings Agency Rotten To Core With Conflicts</strong>
<br /><blockquote>A former senior analyst at Moody's has gone public with his story of how one of the country's most important rating agencies is corrupted to the core.
<br />
<br />The analyst, William J. Harrington, worked for Moody's for 11 years, from 1999 until his resignation last year.
<br />
<br />From 2006 to 2010, Harrington was a Senior Vice President in the derivative products group, which was responsible for producing many of the disastrous ratings Moody's issued during the housing bubble.
<br />
<br />Harrington has made his story public in the form of a 78-page "comment" to the SEC's proposed rules about rating agency reform....
<br />
<br />Here are some key points:
<br />
<br /> * Moody's ratings often do not reflect its analysts' private conclusions. Instead, rating committees privately conclude that certain securities deserve certain ratings--but then vote with management to give the securities the higher ratings that issuer clients want.
<br />
<br /> * Moody's management and "compliance" officers do everything possible to make issuer clients happy--and they view analysts who do not do the same as "troublesome." Management employs a variety of tactics to transform these troublesome analysts into "pliant corporate citizens" who have Moody's best interests at heart.
<br />
<br /> * Moody's product managers participate in--and vote on--ratings decisions. These product managers are the same people who are directly responsible for keeping clients happy and growing Moody's business.
<br />
<br /> * At least one senior executive lied under oath at the hearings into rating agency conduct. Another executive, who Harrington says exemplified management's emphasis on giving issuers what they wanted, skipped the hearings altogether. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-analyst-conflicts-corruption-and-greed-2011-8#ixzz1VyihDRRn">read full report</a>]</blockquote><strong>BOOM!</strong> The SEC Caught Covering Up Wall Street Crimes:
<br />
<br /><strong>Matt Taibbi Exposes How SEC Shredded Thousands of Investigations</strong>
<br />
<br /><blockquote>An explosive new report in Rolling Stone magazine exposes how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission destroyed records of thousands of investigations, whitewashing the files of some of the nation’s largest banks and hedge funds, including AIG, Wells Fargo, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and top Wall Street broker Bernard Madoff. Last week, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa said an agency whistleblower had sent him a letter detailing the unlawful destruction of records detailing more than 9,000 information investigations. We speak with Matt Taibbi, the political reporter for Rolling Stone magazine who broke this story in his latest article....</blockquote>
<br /><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vhENEMS_GuE" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="345"></iframe>
<br />
<br /></center>
<br /><strong>KA-BOOM!</strong> The Fed And All Their Crony-Capitalist Cartel Members Exposed, Yet Again:
<br />
<br /><strong>Wall Street Pentagon Papers Part III – Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Still Too Big To Comprehend?</strong>
<br />
<br /><blockquote><img src="http://ampedstatus.com/images/bernanke-bailout.jpg" alt="Collapse Roundup #5: Goliath On The Ropes, Big Banks Getting Hit Hard, Banking Cartel's Crimes Blowing Up In Their Face" align="right" />Another day, another trillion plus in secret Federal Reserve “bailouts” revealed. Bloomberg News exposes this latest Fed “deal” after winning a long Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) legal battle to get the details on what was done with the American people’s money. Their report runs with an AmpedStatus style headline: “Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion From Fed.”
<br />
<br />The aristocracy is alive and well… thanks to the Fed, of course.
<br />
<br />Keep in mind, this $1.2 trillion is in addition to the $16 trillion the Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit revealed and the over $2 trillion in Quantitative Easing the Fed dished out, not to mention the now continued promise of the Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP). This is also separate from the $700 billion TARP program that Congress approved. This is yet another unknown secret program, throwing another mere $1.2 trillion in public money at the Wall Street elite (global banking cartel), just being revealed now.
<br />
<br />Those of us paying attention over the past three years have had Fed crony-capitalism on steroids fatigue for awhile now. Nonetheless, this is deja vu all over again as another mindbogglingly huge story that must be covered comes to light.
<br />
<br />Here are the details of this latest revelation:
<br />
<br /><center><center><div id="ooyalaPlayer471240393_10ju726OoyalaPlayerOutterWrapper" style="width: 540px; height: 300px; overflow: hidden;"><object data="http://player.ooyala.com/static/cacheable/ae0b0dfc90348cc50c26424686c095f2/player_v2.swf" class="OoyalaVideoPlayer" id="ooyalaPlayer471240393_10ju726" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="540" height="300"><param value="always" name="allowScriptAccess"><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen"><param value="#000000" name="bgcolor"><param value="window" name="wmode"><param value="me=ooyalaPlayer471240393_10ju726&embedCode=oxeXlxMjpO1fl5E4YuIP0yPylTZExZ-o&width=540&height=300&deepLinkEmbedCode=oxeXlxMjpO1fl5E4YuIP0yPylTZExZ-o&video_pcode=oza2w6q8gX9WSkRx13bskffWIuyf&contactServer=player.ooyala.com/Q2HGKJ-PryQsG7CT&text=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**&docUrl=http%3A//ampedstatus.org/full-blown-civil-war-erupts-on-wall-street-as-reality-finally-hits-the-financial-elite-they-start-turning-on-each-other/&autoplay=0&loadStartTime=1315086406552" name="flashvars"></object></div><script src="http://player.ooyala.com/player.js?autoplay=0&height=300&width=540&embedCode=oxeXlxMjpO1fl5E4YuIP0yPylTZExZ-o&deepLinkEmbedCode=oxeXlxMjpO1fl5E4YuIP0yPylTZExZ-o&video_pcode=oza2w6q8gX9WSkRx13bskffWIuyf"></script></center>
<br />[<a href="http://daviddegraw.org/2011/08/wall-street-pentagon-papers-part-iii-are-the-federal-reserves-crimes-still-too-big-to-comprehend/">read full report</a>]</center></blockquote>Speaking of the $16 trillion GAO audit...
<br />
<br /><strong>BOOM!</strong> GAO audit exposed, missing some vital details:
<br />
<br /><strong>More on how the GAO's Fed audit failed to disclose some dirty secrets about BlackRock and JP Morgan </strong>
<br />
<br /><blockquote>In its review of the Fed's outsourcing practices, it failed to mention the most damaging and suspicious sole-source (no bid) contract awarded to BlackRock, which was for handling the New York Fed's toxic Bear Stearns portfolio, otherwise known as Maiden Lane. This contract would generate $108,000,000 in fees and was one of the largest awarded during the bailout period, but it might also have saved JP Morgan $1.1 billion in losses from its Bear Stearns acquisition....
<br />
<br />Also, BlackRock was also one of the managers of the NY Fed's separate $1.25 trillion MBS purchase program as part of QE1. Contrary to the lie on the NY Fed's webpage (that the MBS auctions were conducted via competitive bidding), the NY Fed's own purchasing manager, Brian Sack, admitted in a paper that, "the MBS purchases were arranged with primary dealer counterparties directly, [and] there was no auction mechanism to provide a measure of market supply."
<br />
<br />Putting it all together, it looks like Jamie Dimon signed off on hiring BlackRock for no justifiable reason to trade the very Maiden Lane portfolio that could have caused his bank, JP Morgan, to lose up to $1.1 billion. And, it was entirely possible that BlackRock saved the portfolio by trading the MBS portion of ML with the New York Fed directly as QE1 was underway. [<a href="http://english.economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/08/more-on-how-gaos-phony-fed-audit-failed.html">read full report</a>]</blockquote><strong>BOOM!</strong> Bear Stearns exposed:
<br />
<br /><strong>Report Says Bear Stearns Executives Sold Illegal RMBS and Covered It Up</strong>
<br /><blockquote>Former back office employees from Bear Stearns are coming out of the woodwork to explain how Tom Marano’s mortgage group cheated their own clients out of billions. This week I reported at The Distressed Debt Report, EMC insiders say they were told to make up the classification for whole loans, packaged into mortgage securities, to get them switched out of the trust. By classifying the loans as ‘prepaid’ or having ‘subsequent recoveries’ Bear employees were able to fool the trustee into giving them back loans they were not able to legally service. A move New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is actively investigating now.
<br />
<br />In my latest DealFlow story we hear from EMC staffers who describe how subprime loans, that would have been sold by Bear Stearns trader Jeff Verschleiser’s team, never had a proper servicing license in West Virginia when they were packaged into the residential mortgage backed security. In 2003 Bear/EMC put $100 million of subprime loans from West Virginia into a few RMBS transactions. EMC, the banks wholly owned mortgage servicing shop, would service all of Bear’s RMBS after they were sold.
<br />
<br />A year latter, when senior executies realized the mishap instead of Bear going out and informing their regulator and applying for a license, they orchestrated a cover up and even threaten EMC employees not to talk about it. [read full report]</blockquote>The big banks are getting lit up!
<br />
<br />You shall reap what you sow.
<br />
<br />Karma is a ... bit@h. [<a href="http://daviddegraw.org/2011/08/collapse-roundup-5-goliath-on-the-ropes-big-banks-getting-hit-hard-its-a-bloodbath-as-wall-streets-crimes-blow-up-in-their-face/">read full report</a>]
<br />
<br />Let's end with this video. We need to keep in mind that the Federal Reserve has known about all of this criminal activity from the start. Yet, they have done everything they could, and are still trying, to keep this criminal operation up and running. As all these criminal banks begin to blow up, let's not forget who their central bank is and what they have done to the American people.
<br />
<br />Cenk, take it away and drive the point home:
<br />
<br /><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/evOzYj5YzDE" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="345"></iframe>
<br />
<br /></center><hr /><em>- David DeGraw is the founder and editor of <a href="http://ampedstatus.com/">AmpedStatus.com</a>. His long-awaited book, <a href="http://ampedstatus.com/word-from-the-watchtower-a-hard-rain-is-going-to-fall-introduction-to-the-road-through-2012-revolution-or-world-war-iii/">The Road Through 2012: Revolution or World War III</a>, will finally be released on September 28th. He can be emailed at David[@]AmpedStatus.com. You can follow David's reporting daily on his new personal website: <a href="http://daviddegraw.org/">DavidDeGraw.org</a></em>
<br /><hr />David DeGrawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09426225000245498406noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-47897604730971595642011-09-03T14:20:00.000-07:002011-09-03T17:37:37.244-07:00Extreme Weather: Severe Flooding Hits Gulf Coast; Texas On Fire; Earthquakes Hit Alaska, Argentina; Vast Ice Island; BP Deepwater Horizon Site Leaking<p>By David DeGraw, <a href="http://www.ampedstatus.com/">AmpedStatus.com</a></p><p></p><center><img src="http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?m=02&d=20110903&t=2&i=492933829&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=2011-09-03T171320Z_01_BTRE7821BUC00_RTROPTP_0_STORM-LEE-NHC" alt="" /><p></p>
<br /></center><strong>Tropical storm Lee threatens severe flooding in Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi</strong>
<br /><blockquote><p>Tropical Storm Lee now has winds approaching 60 miles per hour. Louisiana has heavy rain, and authorities warn of flooding in Alabama and Mississippi as well. States of emergency have been declared.</p><p>A tropical storm moving toward the Gulf Coast is predicated to bring massive flooding to Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi this weekend, particularly in New Orleans where up to 20 inches of rain is expected. Tropical Storm Lee will hit southwest Louisiana by Saturday afternoon. The storm is moving southwest of the Mississippi River with maximum sustained winds approaching 60 miles per hour. Flash flood warnings are in effect, covering Mississippi to Texas. A tropical storm warning is also in effect along the coast, stretching from the Alabama-Florida border to the Sabine Pass in Texas. [<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0903/Tropical-storm-Lee-threatens-flooding-in-Alabama-Louisiana-and-Mississippi">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Despite $10 billion effort to rebuild, New Orleans levees get a near-failing grade in new corps rating system</strong></p><blockquote><p>A new Army Corps of Engineers rating system for the nation’s levees is about to deliver a near-failing grade to New Orleans area dikes, despite the internationally acclaimed $10 billion effort to rebuild the system in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, corps officials have confirmed. [<a href="http://www.nola.com/environment/index.ssf/2011/08/new_orleans_levees_get_a_near-.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Lee already causes thousands of power outages in Louisiana</strong></p><blockquote><p>Tropical Storm Lee knocked out power early on Saturday for more than 38,000 customers, primarily in the New Orleans area, said a utility company that provides power for most of Louisiana. Outages are expected to increase as the storm moves ashore… [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/03/us-storm-usa-gulf-power-idUSTRE7821NH20110903">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Repairs Urgently Needed in Vermont</strong></p><blockquote><p>Of all the challenges facing Vermont as it tries to recover from the floods caused by the remnants of Hurricane Irene, there may be none more daunting — or vital to solve — than repairing and reopening the hundreds of roads and dozens of bridges that the storm knocked out. In many spots, the roads must be fixed before equipment can be brought in to repair everything from homes and businesses to the power grid, railroad tracks and water and wastewater systems.</p><p>It is a race against time: winter comes early here, and there are just two and a half months before snowfall and frozen ground typically halt the state’s short road-building season. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/us/03infrastructure.html?_r=1">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Dramatic Aerial Imagery of Irene’s Destruction in Outer Banks</strong></p><p></p><center><img src="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2011/08/irene_outer_banks.jpg" alt="" width="550" />
<br /><p></p><p></p></center><p></p><blockquote><p>The power of Hurricane Irene was clearly apparent to people in its path, but the extent of the damage may be easier to appreciate when seen from above. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is using aerial photographs like the one above to assess Irene’s destruction. In this image of Hatteras Island in North Carolina taken on Aug. 28, the largest breach of Highway 12, which runs along the Outer Banks, can be seen. Water is flowing between Pamlico Sound and the Atlantic Ocean, stranding at least 2,500 residents of the island. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/irene-outer-banks/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Vermont’s misery continues as flooding isolates communities</strong></p><blockquote><p>Residents of Vermont know their work is cut out for them as they struggle for normalcy after enduring the wrath of Irene. The landlocked rural state saw fast-moving floods spawned by the storm swarm towns from Brattleboro to Woodstock. "It’s heartbreaking to see your home and home state destroyed — and seeing places and landmarks that you can recognize even from early childhood now destroyed by flooding," said Ryan Ritter who lives in Rutland near the state’s border with New York. There was no way in or out of his town, the 20-year-old Ritter said. [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/08/30/irene.vermont/index.html?hpt=hp_c1">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>From Waterbury to Wilmington, Vermonters shocked by Irene’s destruction</strong></p><blockquote><p>Vermonters will need weeks to begin to recover from massive flooding from Tropical Storm Irene that killed at least three people and left a trail of devastation from St. Johnsbury to Bennington. That sentiment is reverberating across Vermont, echoed by everyone from Gov. Peter Shumlin to shell-shocked homeowners victimized by the torrent. "This is the most violent thing I’ve ever seen," said Scott Bradley, director of public safety in flood-ravaged Mendon, seeming to speak for the countless Vermonters who watched roads, houses, bridges and businesses wash away in Sunday’s torrent. [<a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20110830/NEWS07/108300301/From-Waterbury-Wilmington-Vermonters-shocked-by-Irene-s-destruction">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Power outages, flooding continue in wake of Hurricane Irene</strong></p><blockquote><p>Of the estimated 5.5 million homes and businesses that lost electricity as a result of the storm, one fifth of these—1.1 million—were still without power as of Thursday morning, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Worst affected were Connecticut, with 16 percent of customers without power, and Rhode Island, where 14 percent were still waiting for it to be restored. The nation’s electric grid, with power lines predominantly above ground, is prone to blackouts. Homes often lose power due to thunderstorms or blizzards, let alone major storms. While authorities are well aware that major hurricanes and tornadoes will sooner or later strike, nothing is done to prepare for them because the power grid is controlled by a network of private energy conglomerates. Neither the energy giants nor the government has any interest in spending the money required to upgrade the system to provide reliable delivery of electricity—a basic necessity—to the population. [<a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/sep2011/iren-s02.shtml">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>‘Astronomical’ High Tide, Typhoon Nanmadol In China Create Massive Waves</strong></p><div style="text-align: center;">
<br /><object id="FiveminPlayer" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="345"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="movie" value="http://embed.5min.com/517152268/"><param name="wmode" value="opaque"><embed name="FiveminPlayer" src="http://embed.5min.com/517152268/" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="opaque" width="560" height="345"></embed></object>
<br /></div>
<br /><blockquote><p>Massive waves crashed against the coast of China’s Zhejiang Province as effects from an approaching typhoon coincided with an "astronomical tide." The high tide creates 60-foot waves 10 days during the lunar calendar… Residents and tourists often head to the coast every August to watch the waves, according to China’s Central Television. Winds from Typhoon Nanmadol intensified their force and height. [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/01/china-high-tide-typhoon-waves_n_944891.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>6.4 earthquake shakes northern Argentina</strong></p><blockquote><p>A magnitude-6.4 earthquake has struck north-central Argentina, shaking things up enough to make people evacuate some buildings in the capital hundreds of miles away. The U.S. Geological Service says the quake’s epicenter was 80 miles (130 kilometers) southeast of Santiago del Estero, a provincial capital of 250,000 people and the 12th-largest city in Argentina. [<a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/national_world&id=8339939">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Major 6.8 quake rocks Alaska</strong>
<br /></p><p></p><blockquote>A major earthquake measuring a preliminary magnitude of 7.1 has rocked remote portions of Alaska, the U.S. Geological Survey reports. The USGS issued, then canceled, a tsunami warning for Alaska’s Aleutian Islands. It also lowered the magnitude to 6.8. Updated at 11:22 a.m. ET: Alaska Native News has weighed in on the quake, noting that the area "is frequented by earthquakes every day, although a majority of them have a magnitude less than this. [<a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/09/major-quake-rocks-alaska/1">read more</a>]</blockquote><p></p><strong>Earthquake caused massive nuclear storage casks to move</strong>
<br /><blockquote><p>Last week’s central Virginia earthquake caused 25 spent-fuel storage casks — each weighing 115 tons — to move on their concrete pad at Dominion Virginia Power’s North Anna nuclear power plant. The shifting of these massive casks holding used nuclear fuel was the first caused by an earthquake in the U.S., according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. None of the metal cylinders was damaged and no radiation was released, Dominion Virginia Power said. Like hockey pucks on a jostled tray, the 16-foot tall casks shifted from an inch to 4½ inches, utility company spokesman Rick Zuercher said. [<a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/business/state-news/2011/aug/31/8/earthquake-caused-massive-nuclear-storage-casks-to-ar-1277791">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><strong>Quake risk to nuclear reactors far higher than realized</strong>
<br /><blockquote><p>The risk that an earthquake would cause a severe accident at a U.S. nuclear plant is greater than previously thought, 24 times as high in one case, according to an AP analysis of preliminary government data. The nation’s nuclear regulator believes a quarter of America’s reactors may need modifications to make them safer. The threat came into sharp focus last week, when shaking from the largest earthquake to hit Virginia in 117 years appeared to exceed what the North Anna nuclear power plant northwest of Richmond was built to sustain. [<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44369172/ns/us_news-environment">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><strong>Texas fires: 80% of state in ‘exceptional’ drought</strong>
<br /><p></p><center><img src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0154350ae5fe970c-800wi" alt="" /><p></p><div style="text-align: left;"><blockquote>The U.S. Drought Monitor has released a new map of drought conditions across the nation, and it’s not a pretty picture for Texas. About 80% of the state is currently experiencing exceptional drought. See what looks like a bloody scab in the bottom center of the country? The brick-red color indicates exceptional drought. The brighter red is considered the not-quite-as-bad extreme drought. And the sunny yellow color? That’s only severe drought. Slightly more than 99% of the state is in severe drought or worse. Here’s a closer view. The U.S. Drought Monitor map is put together by the National Drought Mitigation Center in Lincoln, Neb. [<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/09/report-80-percent-of-texas-experiencing-extreme-drought-conditions.html">read more</a>]</blockquote></div></center><strong>Heat kills more than 124,000 fish in Texas lake</strong>
<br /><blockquote><p>More than 124,000 fish died at Lake Grapevine this week as this summer’s nonstop heat severely depleted oxygen levels, an official with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department said. "There were lots of dead fish stacking up at the Silver Lake Marina," said Tom Hungerford, a fisheries biologist for the agency. The marina is at the southeast end of the lake near the dam. Almost all the dead fish were threadfin shad, biologist Melissa Dudley said. [<a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/01/122838/heat-kills-more-than-124000-fish.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Expanding Deserts, Falling Water Tables, and Toxic Pollutants Driving People from Their Homes | Lester Brown</strong></p><blockquote><p>People do not normally leave their homes, their families, and their communities unless they have no other option. Yet as environmental stresses mount, we can expect to see a growing number of environmental refugees. Rising seas and increasingly devastating storms grab headlines, but expanding deserts, falling water tables, and toxic waste and radiation are also forcing people from their homes. </p><p>Advancing deserts are now on the move almost everywhere. The Sahara desert, for example, is expanding in every direction. As it advances northward, it is squeezing the populations of Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria against the Mediterranean coast. The Sahelian region of Africa—the vast swath of savannah that separates the southern Sahara desert from the tropical rainforests of central Africa—is shrinking as the desert moves southward. As the desert invades Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, from the north, farmers and herders are forced southward, squeezed into a shrinking area of productive land. A 2006 U.N. conference on desertification in Tunisia projected that by 2020 up to 60 million people could migrate from sub-Saharan Africa to North Africa and Europe. [<a href="http://www.earth-policy.org/book_bytes/2011/wotech6_ss2">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Vast ice island set to break off Greenland glacier</strong></p><p></p><center><img src="http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/110901-glacier-before.grid-6x2.jpg" alt="" /><p></p></center><blockquote><p>New photographs taken of a vast glacier in northern Greenland have revealed the astonishing rate of its breakup, with one scientist saying he was rendered "speechless." In August 2010, part of the Petermann Glacier about four times the size of Manhattan island broke off , prompting a hearing in Congress. Researcher Alun Hubbard, of the Centre for Glaciology at Aberystwyth University, U.K., [said] that another section, about twice the size of Manhattan, appeared close to breaking off. [<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44353322/ns/us_news-environment">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Space junk ‘at tipping point’</strong></p><blockquote><p>The amount of debris orbiting the Earth has reached "a tipping point" for collisions, which would in turn generate more of the debris that threatens astronauts and satellites. Nasa needs a new strategic plan for mitigating the hazards posed by spent rocket bodies, discarded satellites and thousands of other pieces of junk flying around the planet at speeds of 28,164km/h, the US National Research Council said in a study published yesterday. [<a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2011/0902/breaking3.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>The return of the BP disaster</strong></p><p></p><center><img src="http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_full_width_scaled/hash/27/a2/27a24c131893cca93f203610f1067df4.JPG" alt="" /><p></p><p></p></center><p></p><blockquote><p>Oil has been surfacing all over the northern quadrant of the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks now, according to residents. Reports of slicks that meander for kilometres and huge expanses of oil sheen that look like phantom islands are becoming common again. Fresh oil, only slightly weathered, has been washing ashore in areas hit hardest by last year’s disaster. These areas include Breton Island, Ship Island, the Chandeleur Islands, and northern Barataria Bay, Louisiana. BP has reactivated its Vessels of Opportunity (VOO) Program to handle clean-up operations. [<a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/09/201191163236563698.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>New leak near Deepwater Horizon site quickly becoming a massive oil slick</strong></p><p></p><center><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mlWKptW74CY" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="345"></iframe></center><p></p><p></p><blockquote><p>Over the past two weeks, I have been closely following reports of renewed leaking in the Macondo oil field, the site of last year’s Deepwater Horizon disaster. </p><p>First, New Orleans Lawyer Stuart Smith reported that nearly 40 ships were hired by BP to conduct a boom-laying mission over the August 13th weekend. Next, nonprofit organizations On Wings of Care and Gulf Restoration Network conducted a joint flyover of the spill site, bringing back photographic evidence of fresh oil near the site of the Macondo well. This in turn prompted reporters from the Mobile Press-Register to hire a boat out to the site, where they found massive “globules” of oil rising to the surface, creating a growing sheen on the water. [<a href="https://www.examiner.com/environmental-news-in-tallahassee/new-leak-near-deepwater-horizon-site-quickly-becoming-a-massive-oil-slick">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Dispersants Used in BP Gulf Oil Spill Linked to Cancer</strong></p><blockquote>Five of the 57 ingredients in dispersants approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for use on oil spills are linked to cancer, finds a new research report based on data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by environmental groups on the Gulf of Mexico. The report from Earthjustice, an environmental law firm, along with Toxipedia Consulting Services, is based on material released by the U.S. EPA in response to a Freedom of Information Act request made by Earthjustice on behalf of the Gulf Restoration Network and the Florida Wildlife Federation.
<br /><p>Dispersants are used to clean up oil spills and contain chemicals that break up oil into smaller droplets and move the oil from the surface of the water into the water column. Two oil dispersant products were used heavily in the BP oil leak: COREXIT 9500 and 9527, both produced by Nalco/Exxon. BP used over 1.8 million gallons of dispersant during the three-month long oil leak that gushed 4.9 million barrels of crude oil from the Macondo well located about 40 miles southeast of the Louisiana coast. [<a href="http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/152204">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Toxicologist: Michigan oil spill far more toxic than admitted</strong></p><blockquote><p>The medical community knows this,” she says. “The public policies have not been adjusted to reflect the new science because the petrochemical lobby is so strong that it is blocking the health consequences of our continued oil use.” Ott says sick people are a problem for oil companies and the government. “It’s not just a simple pipeline break or a rig blow out. It’s America’s energy future, the politicians have no exit strategy off oil,” she says. “So they minimize the costs in sick people, lost babies, it doesn’t matter. That’s what we’re seeing. Battle Creek is a pawn in this giant bid for Alberta tar sands. It doesn’t matter that it happened in Battle Creek … there will be countless communities in the future. What is starting to change is that — after witnessing this over two decades now — this is a decision that is not going to be made by the politicians, our energy policy, it’s going to be the people. Fracking, tar sands, there is a moral obligation for future life and immediate public health that we do something different. That will give enough transformation to bring the politicians along. [<a href="http://michiganmessenger.com/52176/toxicologist-oil-spill-far-more-toxic-than-admitted">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><strong>10 Facts About Global Energy Consumption That Will Surprise You</strong>
<br /><blockquote><p>In fact, global energy consumption grew 5.6 percent in 2010, the highest rate since 1973. Discover 10 other fascinating facts about worldwide consumption. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/fascinating-facts-about-global-energy-2011-8?op=1">read more</a>]</p></blockquote><p><strong>Cesium leak equal to 168 ’45 A-bombs – NISA compares contamination to Hiroshima blast</strong></p><blockquote><p>The amount of radioactive cesium ejected by the Fukushima reactor meltdowns is about 168 times higher than that emitted in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, the government’s nuclear watchdog said….</p><p>The report said the crippled Fukushima No. 1 plant has released 15,000 terabecquerels of cesium-137, which lingers for decades and can cause cancer, compared with the 89 terabecquerels released by the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima. [<a href="http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110827x3.html">read more</a>]</p></blockquote>
<br /><hr />
<br />David DeGrawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09426225000245498406noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-24903320776288883392011-08-31T07:39:00.000-07:002011-09-03T22:23:48.529-07:00Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda. 4 of 4.<p></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;">
<br /></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em><strong>By Carl Herman, </strong></em><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history, who blogs as the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/carl-herman">Nonpartisan Examiner</a> at Examiner.com</span><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>. Carl was one of the leaders who launched the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcredit">microcredit movement</a>, and is a tireless activist for peace and justice.
<br /></strong></em></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;">
<br /><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong></strong></em></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>Don't be confused by the title. Carl - like all of us at Washington's Blog - is against violent revolution, following instead the non-violent paths of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. As we have previously written:</strong></em></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: bold 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><i></i></p><blockquote><i>I am NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, I am calling for the reinstatement of our government. I am calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, I am calling for its enforcement.</i></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><em><strong>
<br /></strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><i>My friend and colleague for justice, Washington’s Blog’s author, invited me to “guest blog.” I’ll provide two. First: </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/gandhi-s-on-ending-injustice-speak-the-truth-because-truth-is-god"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Gandhi’s conclusion of the essential importance of speaking Truth</i></span></a><i>. Second: a </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>4-part series</i></span></a><i> to document that current US wars are unlawful, US economic policy is massive criminal fraud, and that these “emperor has no clothes” facts are lied about by US corporate media in constant deception.</i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>I appreciate Washington’s Blog’s author for the intellectual integrity and moral courage to document powerful facts; as I appreciate readers’ thoughts, words, and acts of virtue - </i><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Carl Herman</i></span></a><i> </i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote>“We denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a free hour, when our power of choice is untrammeled and when nothing prevents our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse pains.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero, On Duties: The Extremes of Good and Evil, 44 BCE, translated by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Rackham"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >H. Rackham</span></a> (1914).</blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>Revolution </i></b>is from the Latin, <i>revolutio</i>, a “turn around” of political power.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The US public would revolt and end unlawful US wars and banksters’ rigged-casino fraud if they understood and embraced the central facts of these issues. This four-part series of articles provides the central facts, invites passionate public response, and proposes specific revolutionary public action.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Please share the Revolution to end unlawful US wars and return trillions of our dollars to constructive work. With millions of lives at stake (perhaps billions), there is nothing more important for public participation.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 1: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-criminal-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic/criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 2: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-all-begun-with-lies-2-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all begun with lies</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 3: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-parasitic-and-criminal-economics-3-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Part 4: <b>Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">These four articles are academic in language and documentation. My citizen advocacy paper, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/government-by-dicts-my-comprehensive-resources-to-prove-us-fascism-and-rigged-casino-economics-1"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Government by dicts</i></span></a>, has additional resources.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">_____________________________________________________________________________________________</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Why corporate media propagandizes and won’t expose the “emperor has no clothes” obvious: </b>They’re complicit with government “leadership” is the <i>prima facie</i> explanation. Let’s examine this important question more closely. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Much of the factual evidence I provided was probably new and surprising. Given the importance of the information in this paper, verifiable factual credibility, and expert testimony to promote it, the fact that corporate media will not comprehensively report it is circumstantial evidence of collusion to support unlawful government policies. Circumstantial evidence is not definitive, but will raise your eyebrows to ask why you haven’t been informed from corporate media sources. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">We have verified history of official government propaganda having infiltrated corporate media. The Church Senate Committee hearings had the cooperation of CIA Director William Colby’s testimony that <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d23-Prostitution-journalism-Yup-mainstream-media-is-intentional-propaganda-Accept-the-evidence"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >over 400 CIA operatives were controlling US corporate media</span></a> reporting on specific issues of national interest in what they called Operation Mockingbird. This stunning testimony was then confirmed by Pulitzer Prize reporter <a href="http://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Carl Bernstein’s research</span></a> and reporting. Of course, <b>corporate media refused to publish Bernstein’s article</b> and it became the cover-story for <i>Rolling Stone. </i>Bernstein provides additional information of CIA control in the Senate report and corporate media subsequent reporting: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“Pages 191 to 201 were entitled “Covert Relationships with the United States Media.” “It hardly reflects what we found,” stated Senator Gary Hart. “There was a prolonged and elaborate negotiation [with the CIA] over what would be said.” </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >Obscuring the facts was relatively simple. No mention was made of the 400 summaries or what they showed. Instead the report noted blandly that some fifty recent contacts with journalists had been studied by the committee staff—thus conveying the impression that the Agency’s dealings with the press had been limited to those instances. The Agency files, the report noted, contained little evidence that the editorial content of American news reports had been affected by the CIA’s dealings with journalists. Colby’s misleading public statements about the use of journalists were repeated without serious contradiction or elaboration. The role of cooperating news executives was given short shrift. The fact that the Agency had concentrated its relationships in the most prominent sectors of the press went unmentioned. That the CIA continued to regard the press as up for grabs was not even suggested.” </span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Let’s consider the specific case of corporate media collusion with official government rhetoric to lie about Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s October 2005 speech and contrive a non-existent physical threat to Israel. First: for the US political leaders and corporate media to accuse the president of Iran with threatening to destroy Israel, that’s the most serious of accusations. A threat of national destruction is the most vicious statement a head of state can make. For corporate media to not be in collusion to “report” this proven lie would have to mean that everyone involved in the story never read the speech in question, never consulted with Persian experts, and disregarded all people like me who informed them of their egregious error. Again, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d20-Obama-aggress-for-war-Media-echoes-lie-Iran-threatens-to-wipe-Israel-off-the-map-Citizen-action"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >here’s my link</span></a> of corporate media’s “reporting” in print and television allowing US political leaders to lie and repeating the lie themselves. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Of course, you have to verify the speech in order to not interpret the facts as a mistranslation or possible translation. This is appropriately analogous to checking the instant replay of the pitch at the baseball game to make sure it really was so outrageously outside the strike-zone that an “official” call that the pitch was a strike is stating a known lie. If it was an immediate error, it could and should have been corrected. That six years have passed and corporate media doesn’t inform Americans of the actual content and context of the speech is absolute evidence of an official propaganda arm of the same oligarchy spinning for unlawful war against Iran. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m4d6-Fox-news-continues-CBS-ABC-CNN-propaganda-to-attack-Iran-todays-CIA-Operation-Mockingbird">I’ve written articles</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> providing evidence for obvious war propaganda to attack Iran identical to what we witnessed before the US attacked Iraq. From my article on CNN’s “reporting”: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >When we now know that <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d20-Iraq-war-8th-year--All-intelligence-for-war-proven-as-Orwellian-and-treasonous-lies-Now-what"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >all claims for war with Iraq were known lies as they were told</span></a> (and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d29-Carl-Herman-podcast-explaining-the-evidence-for-Iraq-war-is-all-based-on-lies--Orwellian-unlawful"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >verbally explained here</span></a>), and CNN provides similar innuendo for war by an unsourced alleged report with concerns of what might occur in the future allegedly stated by an unnamed US source reporting on an unnamed foreign source, this is propaganda and not news.</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">For another specific example, Mike Wallace of the famed television show <i>60 Minutes</i> won an Emmy for a contrived interview with President Ahmadinejad in 2006, where Mr. Ahmadinejad’s comments encouraging democracy for Palestinians was edited to appear that he was hostile to Israel. You can verify this “emperor has no clothes” obvious lies and propaganda by watching the brief 5-minute clip for yourself in <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m8d8-Iran-and-wiping-Israel-off-the-map"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >this article</span></a>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">"<a href="http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/torture_at_times_hks_students.pdf"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media</span></a>," a paper published from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, found from the 1930s to 2004 that <i>The New York Times </i>reported waterboarding as torture 82% of the time, and <i>The Los Angeles Times</i> did so 96%. After stories broke that the US was waterboarding "detainees" in US unlawful wars, the papers' reporting of waterboarding as torture dropped to 1% and 5%, respectfully. In addition, after the US admitted to waterboarding, <i>The Wall Street Journal </i>called it torture in just 1 of 63 articles (2%), and <i>USA Today</i> never called it torture. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Just as only <a href="http://people-press.org/report/606/trust-in-government"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >one in five Americans report trust and satisfaction with their government</span></a>, Americans also perceive corporate media disinformation and are rejecting their “reporting.” According to a <a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/564/internet-news-audience"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >2007 poll by the Pew Research Center</span></a>, the majority of the American public see the US major media news organizations as politically biased, inaccurate, and uncaring. Among those who use the Internet, two-thirds report that major media news do not care about the people they report on, 59% say the news is inaccurate, 64% see bias, and 53% summarize their view on major media news as, “failing to stand up for America.” In their <a href="http://people-press.org/report/543/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >latest poll</span></a>, “just 29% of Americans say that news organizations generally get the facts straight, while 63% say that news stories are often inaccurate.” </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">A <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/june_2010/66_of_voters_are_angry_at_the_media"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >June 2010 Rasmussen poll</span></a> found 66% of voters "angry" at the media, with 33% "very angry." Rasmussen also found 70% "angry" at current federal government policies. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The genesis of oligarchic control of American major media was reported in the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m6d6-Congressional-Record-JP-Morgan--Co-purchased-all-major-media-for-propaganda-1917-And-now"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >US Congressional Record in 1917</span></a>. US Congressperson Oscar Callaway claimed evidence that J.P. Morgan had purchased editorial control over 25 of the nation's most influential publications in order to create public support for US entry into World War 1 and his new banking legislative victory: creation of the Federal Reserve system. Mr. Callaway's colleagues voted down an official investigation. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Related history is summarized and documented in this brief article, "<a href="http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-03/news-media-war-written-terry-hansen"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >The news media at war</span></a>." </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Importantly, it is also likely that disinformation programs infiltrate the comments of independent writers, like this source that you’re reading. Don’t be surprised if my proposal for Revolution attracts propagandistic attack of predictable rhetorical fallacies such as slurs of my character, straw-man arguments of what I write, denial of facts, lies of omission of central facts, and whatever other BS (thank you, Professor Frankfurt). The discerning characteristic of all propaganda is non-factual bravado and specious argument in order to maintain manipulative control of an agenda and distract attention from the damning facts. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You, the reader, are sharp enough to discern such propaganda. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The specific pathway for Revolution will be created as Dr. King and Gandhi discovered: through trial and error. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m12d8-Ending-unlawful-US-wars-in-Afghanistan-Iraq-Gandhi--MLK--prosecution-ends-US-fall-into-fascism"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >What we’ve learned through their process</span></a> is broad public and political communication of the facts and appropriate formal policy requests to honor what we’ve already won under the law. I’m among several who champion a policy strategy of an American <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m9d17-What-do-we-do-with-traitors-who-wage-Wars-of-Aggression-Truth--Reconcile-em"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Truth and Reconciliation</span></a> process. When one confirms the lies for war and economic fraud, the obvious conclusion is that “leadership” of both parties are so deeply involved in criminal acts that perhaps the best response is to split those willing for a “Scrooge conversion” to disclose critical facts in exchange for no prosecution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Martin King and Mohandas Gandhi demonstrated in their campaigns that transformative civic education causes a critical mass of educated people for breakthroughs in history-altering public policy. The public benefits of Revolution are the end of unlawful US wars and turning trillions of our dollars from unlawful fraudulent profits of an oligarchy to the public good of Americans producing the real economic value. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Again, imagine<b><i>: how could you have helped the Civil Rights movement if Dr. King had asked? What would you have done if Gandhi asked for your help?</i></b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In the converse: would you be proud today of rejecting Dr. King’s direct invitation for partnership in a Revolution for Civil Rights when he was only asking for public education on the clear letter and spirit of the 14thAmendment? Would you be proud today of rejecting Gandhi’s direct request for partnership in civic revolution to end the evils of unwanted imperialism by the strong against the weak? </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This is how Mr. Gandhi and Dr. King saw their civic educational challenge: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >"One thing we have endeavoured to observe most scrupulously, namely, never to depart from the strictest facts and, in dealing with the difficult questions that have arisen during the year, we hope that we have used the utmost moderation possible under the circumstances. Our duty is very simple and plain. We want to serve the community, and in our own humble way to serve the Empire. We believe in the righteousness of the cause, which it is our privilege to espouse. We have an abiding faith in the mercy of the Almighty God, and we have firm faith in the British Constitution. That being so, we should fail in our duty if we wrote anything with a view to hurt. Facts we would always place before our readers, whether they are palatable or not, and it is by placing them constantly before the public in their nakedness that the misunderstanding… can be removed."</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > - Mohandas K. Gandhi, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Opinion"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Indian Opinion</i></span></a>(1 October 1903) </span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“‘A time comes when silence is betrayal.’ That time has come for us in relation to Vietnam. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >The truth of these words is beyond doubt but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government's policy, especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one's own bosom and in the surrounding world.”</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;font-size:100%;color:#000000;" > - Dr. Martin Luther King, “<a href="http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html%20"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence</span></a>.” </span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" ></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">I do not place myself in Gandhi and Dr. King’s company, and I assume that neither do you. But I do suggest that We the People are like in spirit and will stand for Revolution in the face of War Criminals and destruction of trillions of families’ and children’s dollars. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In consideration for Revolution, you should also know that the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/mlk-assassinated-by-us-government-martin-luther-king-civil-1999-decision"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >King family's civil trial found the US government guilty of Dr. King's assassination</span></a>. <b>US Corporate media refused to cover the trial or interview Dr. King's wife</b>. His family's opinion is that the US government murdered Dr. King to end his protests against unlawful US wars and his call to end poverty.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>In conclusion: </b>The century within which we were all born witnessed <a href="http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >over 250 million human beings slaughtered by governments in war and atrocities</span></a>. War is used as a continuous “foreign policy,” with the US in present egregious and unlawful abuse of their superpower status. History will judge when Americans developed the education competence to evolve beyond endless wars. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>You can help make that time now.</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Revolution in the steps from Gandhi and MLK are simple to understand:</span></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><ol style="list-style-type: decimal"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Because the facts are so easily verified and all on our side, <b>education of anyone and everyone</b> is one component. This will become a sophisticated and multi-front campaign similar to the Civil Rights Movement.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Create public and political will</b>. Gandhi demanded political independence of India. Dr. King demanded equal treatment under the law. Millions of Americans informed of the facts can and should demand an end of unlawful war, return of Constitutional rights, and the end of parasitic criminal fraud of trillions of our dollars every year. The fact of "emperor has no clothes" obvious UNLAWFUL war is a trigger for those of us with Oaths to defend the US Constitution to refuse all orders for unlawful war and act for the arrest of those who issue them.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>An elegant way for peaceful surrender of War Criminals and “banksters.”</b> I’m a leader for the education and promotion of <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/what-to-do-with-us-traitors-who-wage-wars-of-aggression-1-truth-reconciliation-2-prosecution"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">Truth and Reconciliation</span></a> to exchange full factual disclosure and return of public assets for no prosecution. Those who decline will be prosecuted after the window of Truth and Reconciliation closes.</span></li> </span></ol><p></p><ol style="list-style-type: decimal"> </ol> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px">There are related issues with war, economic oligarchy, and propaganda that can and should be included in this proposal for Revolution. To keep this paper relatively brief, I’ve kept the topics limited. These related issues include torture, unlimited detention, extrajudicial assassination (all of which are unconstitutionally applied, including to American citizens), unaccountable elections on electronic voting machines that exit poll data prove are "fixed," and more; all or which cannot exist in a society worthy of the title, “free.” <span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government."</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > - US Declaration of Independence. July 4, 1776.</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p><p></p>Carl Hermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06658884974184959361noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-75042793607159493732011-08-31T06:46:00.000-07:002011-08-31T06:47:59.074-07:00US or the War Machine<p class="subhead">An upcoming Charlottesville conference highlights the importance of whistleblowers when addressing the corruption present in military contracting</p><div class="date"><span class="author">By <a href="http://www.cavalierdaily.com/?s=%22David%20Swanson%22">David Swanson</a>, Guest Viewpoint</span> on August 31, 2011, <a href="http://www.cavalierdaily.com/2011/08/31/us-or-the-war-machine">Cavalier Daily</a>
<br /></div><div id="attachment_44614" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 205px"><a href="http://www.cavalierdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Opinion.Bunnygreenhouse.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-44614" title="Opinion.Bunnygreenhouse" src="http://www.cavalierdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Opinion.Bunnygreenhouse-195x300.jpg" alt="" height="300" width="195" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bunnatine “Bunny” Greenhouse</p></div><p>YOU MAY have heard something about a budget crisis in Washington this summer. Were you aware that in the midst of it the House of Representatives passed a military spending bill larger than ever before?</p><p>U.S. military spending across numerous departments has increased dramatically during the past decade and now makes up about half of federal discretionary spending. Yet the Defense Department has not been fully audited in 20 years, and as of 2001 it could not account for $2.3 trillion out of the $10 trillion or so it had been given during that time. More recently, President Obama has been waging his “days, not weeks” war in Libya for months without a dime appropriated by Congress, relying instead on the loose change lying around at the Pentagon.</p><p>The United States could reduce its military spending by at least 80 percent and still be the world’s top military spender. If the purpose of all this profligacy were truly defensive, wouldn’t a military merely as large as any other country’s do the job? When little cuts around the edges were forced into the discussion, wouldn’t the top priorities for elimination be unpopular wars, foreign bases, nuclear weapons and space weapons rather than health care for veterans? If something shameful were not motivating our self-destructive imperial overreach, wouldn’t the wonders of market competition be given a chance, instead of the current practice of handing out cost-plus contracts to cronies for jobs they are never expected to complete?</p><p><strong>Paying our debts</strong>
<br /> When someone inside the military contracting process gives us a peak at what is done with half our income taxes, we owe that person a debt of gratitude. And the person who has opened the widest crack in the wall of secrecy around Pentagon spending in recent years is probably Bunnatine “Bunny” Greenhouse, who will be speaking in Charlottesville along with more than 20 other experts Sept. 16-18.</p><p>In February 2003, just before the United States invaded Iraq, Greenhouse, the chief contracting officer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, found herself in a Pentagon meeting discussing the terms of an Iraq contract to be awarded to Halliburton, the company for which then-Vice President Dick Cheney had served previously as CEO. Greenhouse whispered to the general running the meeting that she objected to the presence of several Halliburton representatives in the room, and when they had left she recommended against awarding the company a $7 billion emergency, no-bid contract for five years. While it was ludicrous to pretend that a contracting “emergency” would last that long, Congress has continued ever since to fund our wars with off-the-books “emergency supplemental” bills.</p><p>Despite Cheney’s claim to the contrary on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sept. 14, 2003, he had been involved in creating that Halliburton contract. This is shown by an email that Time Magazine published in June 2004, as well as by the testimony of political appointee Michael Mobbs. Mobbs had worked with Halliburton to create the need for the contract and then to fill it, much as then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had, years earlier, created needs for Halliburton’s services that he had then been able to fill as its CEO.</p><p>Cheney hired Halliburton to recommend privatizing military services with a company like Halliburton. Halliburton, in turn, hired Cheney to share in the spoils. And then Cheney, while still receiving deferred compensation from Halliburton, made sure his company continued to rake in the profits. This chutzpah was matched only by the Halliburton drivers hauling empty trucks across Iraq and reporting that they had transported “sailboat fuel.”</p><p>Greenhouse’s resistance to the corrupt cronyism that predated and outlasted Cheney cost her the job of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers chief contracting officer. This summer she finally was awarded $970,000 in restitution. If that award legitimizes Greenhouse’s concerns in the eyes of many, so much the better. We really should not need a stamp of approval from our government, however, before approving of serious criticism of governmental wrongdoing.</p><p><strong>The Greenhouse effect</strong>
<br /> The lesson that Greenhouse would have us learn is not that the system finally worked, but that it is fundamentally broken. Our representative government is under the thumb of the military-industrial complex of which President Eisenhower warned 50 years ago this year. “In my actions, there were no thoughts of repercussions,” Greenhouse said. “My thoughts were about doing the right things for the best interest of the government.”</p><p>Greenhouse eventually sent a letter to then-Acting Secretary of the Army Les Brownlee, which somehow ended up in the hands of Congressional staffers who in turn shared it with media outlets. Greenhouse said she has no knowledge of how the letter got to Congress, which suggests the possible existence of another whistleblower. Such anonymous whistleblowers deserve our thanks as well.</p><p>“The following Monday after the letter was received,” Greenhouse said, “Lieutenant General [Carl] Strock, in his introductory statements in our weekly Directors and Office Chiefs Meeting, stated: ‘I understand we have a whistleblower in our midst, but don’t worry about it because the system will take care of itself.’ … He was letting my fellow SES [Senior Executive Service] and Senior Leaders know that he felt that I was a ‘skunk in the park,’ which elevated their fears and their treatment of me. My top secret clearance was taken away. I was moved to a cubicle in Civil Works where I was placed on an over-hire position unknown to me.” Greenhouse was demoted but told she could keep her SES rank if she retired, which she refused to do.</p><p>Greenhouse described to me the contract abuses she witnessed and explained their illegality. “Appropriate laws and regulations are on the books,” she said, “but if contracting officials are continually intimidated and removed from their positions when they highlight improprieties … our laws and regulations are not worth the paper they are written on.”</p><p>Asked about the compensation she has been awarded, Greenhouse said, “I feel blessed in that the best and most dedicated lawyers came to my rescue. I am disheartened because the legal process does not provide adequate protection or remedies to federal whistleblowers. I am relieved that my ordeal has come to an end and I take comfort knowing that I would do it all over again because doing what’s right is a sacred duty.”</p><p><strong>A call to attention </strong>
<br /> But the problem remains. “There has been a chill over the contracting and SES communities since my demotion,” Greenhouse said, “and many contracting folks believe if one tries to curb contracting abuse, they will not be thanked, but fired.” Notice the present tense. Greenhouse is not suffering under the delusion that changing the president’s political party transforms the Pentagon.</p><p>In fact, retribution against whistleblowers has intensified under President Obama, as exemplified by the cases of Thomas Drake, James Risen, Shamai Leibowitz and Bradley Manning. A Justice Department openly taking its direction from Obama has gone to great lengths to protect and conceal the war crimes of recent years and to prosecute or punish whistleblowers. Drake was prosecuted unsuccessfully for leaking to the public information on the actvities of the National Security Agency. Risen is threatened with imprisonment if he does not betray his source or sources for a chapter in a book he published about an embarrassingly dumb and dangerous CIA attempt to infiltrate Iran’s nuclear program. Leibowitz, too, was prosecuted for whistleblowing. And Manning, who is accused of leaking to Wikileaks more information on what our government has been doing in recent years than has been provided by any other source, has been imprisoned for the past year, often in conditions bordering on torture, without being brought to trial.</p><p>We should judge the contributions of someone like Manning for ourselves, without awaiting a government stamp of approval that may never come or may come too late. As Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.” We will not be well-informed, however, until whistleblowers are honored rather than punished.</p><p><em>David Swanson, a blogger and author, graduated from the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1997.</em></p>davidswansonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10504910392531997676noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-8587323758883685962011-08-29T14:13:00.000-07:002011-08-29T14:17:19.138-07:00Lies, War, and Empire: NATO’s “Humanitarian Imperialism” in Libya<p><em><strong>Andrew Gavin Marshall</strong> is an independent researcher and writer based in Montreal, Canada, writing on a number of social, political, economic, and historical issues. He is co-editor of the book, “The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century.” His website is <strong>http://www.andrewgavinmarshall.com.</strong></em></p><p><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">
<br /></span></span></p><p><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CAWe1IJWxEA" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="345" width="560"></iframe></span></span></p><p>
<br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></span></p><p>In this report I seek to examine the war against Libya in a more critical and comprehensive manner than that of the story we have been told. We hear a grand fairy tale about powerful Western nations working together to save innocent civilians in a far-off country who simply want the freedoms and rights we already have. Here we are, our nations and governments – whose officials we elect (generally) – are bombing and killing people on the other side of the world. Is it not our responsibility, as citizens of these very Western nations, to examine and critique the claims of our governments? They are, after all, killing people around the world in our name. Should we not seek to discover if they are lying?</p> <p>It has been said, “In war, truth is the first casualty.” Libya is no exception. From the lies that started the war, to the rebels linked to al-Qaeda, ethnically cleansing black Libyans, killing civilians, propaganda, PR firms, intelligence agents, and possible occupation; Libya is a more complex story than the fairy tale we have been sold. Reality always is.</p> <p><strong>What Were the ‘Reasons’ for ‘Intervention’?</strong></p> <p>We were sold the case for war in Libya as a “humanitarian intervention.” We were told, of course, that we “needed” to intervene in Libya because Muammar Gaddafi was killing his own people in large numbers; those people, on the same token, were presented as peaceful protesters resisting the 40-plus year reign of a brutal dictator.</p> <p>In early March of 2011, news headlines in Western nations reported that Gaddafi would kill half a million people.[1] On March 18, as the UN agreed to launch air strikes on Libya, it was reported that Gaddafi had begun an assault against the rebel-held town of Benghazi. The <em>Daily Mail</em> reported that Gaddafi had threatened to send in his African mercenaries to crush the rebellion.[2] Reports of Libyan government tanks sitting outside Benghazi poised for an invasion were propagated in the Western media.[3] In the lead-up to the United Nations imposing a no-fly zone, reports spread rapidly through the media of Libyan government jets bombing the rebels.[4] Even in February, the <em>New York Times</em> – the sacred temple for the ‘stenographers of power’ we call “journalists” – reported that Gaddafi was amassing “thousands of mercenaries” to defend Tripoli and crush the rebels.[5] Italy’s Foreign Minister declared that over 1,000 people were killed in the fighting in February, citing the number as “credible.”[6] Even a top official with Human Rights Watch declared the rebels to be “peaceful protesters” who “are nice, sincere people who want a better future for Libya.”[7] The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights declared that “thousands” of people were likely killed by Gaddafi, “and called for international intervention to protect civilians.”[8] In April, reports spread near and far at lightning speed of Gaddafi’s forces using rape as a weapon of war, with the first sentence in a <em>Daily Mail</em> article declaring, “Children as young as eight are being raped in front of their families by Gaddafi’s forces in Libya,” with Gaddafi handing out Viagra to his troops in a planned and organized effort to promote rape.[9]</p> <p>As it turned out, these claims – as posterity notes – turned out to be largely false and contrived. Doctors Without Borders and Amnesty International both investigated the claims of rape, and “have found no first-hand evidence in Libya that rapes are systematic and being used as part of war strategy,” and their investigations in Eastern Libya “have not turned up significant hard evidence supporting allegations of rapes by Qaddafi’s forces.” Yet, just as these reports came out, Hillary Clinton declared that the U.S. is “deeply concerned by reports of wide-scale rape” in Libya.[10] Even U.S. military and intelligence officials had to admit that, “there is no evidence that Libyan military forces are being given Viagra and engaging in systematic rape against women in rebel areas”; at the same time Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, “told a closed-door meeting of officials at the UN that the Libyan military is using rape as a weapon in the war with the rebels and some had been issued the anti-impotency drug. She reportedly offered no evidence to backup the claim.”[11]</p> <p>An investigation by Amnesty International, released in June, attempted to assess the on-the-ground (as opposed to ‘in-the-newspapers’) reality of the claims made which led to Western “intervention” in Libya. Among the stories of mass rapes were the use, by Gaddafi, of “foreign mercenaries” and using helicopters and jets to attack rebel forces and protesters. As the <em>Independent</em> reported in June:</p> <blockquote><p>An investigation by Amnesty International has failed to find evidence for these human rights violations and in many cases has discredited or cast doubt on them. It also found indications that <em>on several occasions the rebels in Benghazi appeared to have knowingly made false claims or manufactured evidence</em>.[12]</p></blockquote> <p>Hillary Clinton stated, “Rape, physical intimidation, sexual harassment, and even so-called ‘virginity tests’ have taken place in countries throughout the region,” and at the same time, the senior crisis responder for Amnesty International who was in Libya for three months following the uprising stated, “we have not found any evidence or a single victim of rape or a doctor who knew about somebody being raped.” Human Rights Watch reported, “We have not been able to find evidence.” The rebels had been very active, in fact, in manufacturing and propagating lies that supported intervention and war, as the Amnesty representative explained, “rebels dealing with the foreign media in Benghazi started showing journalists packets of Viagra, claiming they came from burned-out tanks, though it is unclear why the packets were not charred.” Further, in regards to the use of foreign mercenaries, for which many black Africans were killed and imprisoned by the rebels, Amnesty reported, “there was no evidence for this.” The Amnesty rep in Libya declared: “Those shown to journalists as foreign mercenaries were later quietly released… Most were sub-Saharan migrants working in Libya without documents.” Others, Amnesty reported, “were not so lucky and were lynched or executed,” as “the politicians kept talking about mercenaries, which inflamed public opinion and the myth has continued because they were released without publicity.”[13]</p> <p>Those migrants who were shown to foreign media were not represented in that media in a friendly or even falsely unbiased manner. As the <em>Daily Mail</em> reported at the time, publishing photos of the “savage mercenaries” who later turned out to be migrant workers, “they were a pretty sorry bunch,” and that, “you could smell their fear.” The article then went on to declare, “these men are alleged to have been among several thousand foreign thugs and gunmen that Muammar Gaddafi sent against his own people, to kill and destroy and quell the uprising in eastern Libya.” Now, claimed the <em>Daily Mail</em>, “they are the prisoners of the people.” However, the article continued to – several paragraphs below, mind you – quote some of the “savage mercenaries” who made statements to the reporter such as: “We did not do anything… We are all construction workers from Ghana. We harmed no one… they are lying about us. We were taken from our house at night when we were sleeping.” The reporter assessed the situation with: “Still complaining, they were led away. It was hard to judge their guilt.”[14]</p> <p>Further, with the “credible” reports – as the Italian Foreign Minister referred to them – of “thousands” of civilians killed by Gaddafi in the early weeks of rebellion, the Amnesty International investigation found that, “there is no proof of mass killing of civilians.” During the first days of the uprising, most of the fighting was in Benghazi, “where 100 to 110 people were killed, and the city of Baida to the east, where 59 to 64 were killed.” However, there were indications that some of these deaths were also pro-Gaddafi forces, and that some “protesters” had weapons, indicating that it may have been a fight as opposed to a massacre. Further, reported Amnesty: “There is no evidence that aircraft or heavy anti-aircraft machine guns were used against crowds. Spent cartridges picked up after protesters were shot at came from Kalashnikovs or similar calibre weapons.” The Amnesty report further criticized Western media coverage of the war:</p> <blockquote><p>Much Western media coverage has from the outset presented a very one-sided view of the logic of events, portraying the protest movement as entirely peaceful and repeatedly suggesting that the regime’s security forces were unaccountably massacring unarmed demonstrators who presented no security challenge.[15]</p></blockquote> <p>As for the notion that NATO was bombing Gaddafi troops poised for an invasion, even the <em>New York Times</em> quoted a Libyan official who claimed, “that Western powers were now attacking the Libyan Army in retreat, a far cry from the United Nations mandate to establish a no-fly zone to protect civilians.” This is an important point, because the reason for the UN no-fly zone was purportedly to “protect civilians,” not to “take sides” in the civil conflict between the government and the rebels. As a Libyan official stated, some Libyan forces “were attacked as they were clearly moving westbound,” as in, away from Benghazi and the rebels in the east. He further stated, “Clearly NATO is taking sides in this civil conflict. It is illegal. It is not allowed by the Security Council resolution. And it is immoral, of course.” At the same time, the NATO Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, declared that, “NATO will implement all aspects of the U.N. resolution. Nothing more, nothing less.”[16]</p> <p>Days before the Libyan government official claimed that Libyan forces were in retreat as they were bombed (something which would no doubt be immediately cast aside as Libyan propaganda by Western media sources), the <em>New York Times</em>, within days of NATO strikes beginning, reported on 20 March 2011 that, “with brutal efficiency, allied warplanes bombed tanks, missile launchers and civilian cars, leaving a smoldering trail of wreckage that stretched for miles,” and further, outside of Benghazi, “many of the tanks seemed to have been retreating, or at least facing the other way. And others were simply abandoned.”[17]</p> <p>Richard Haas, President of the Council on Foreign Relations, the most prestigious and influential think tank in the United States, was also a former Director of Policy Planning for the U.S. Department of State, former National Security Council Senior Director, who has also been a key figure within the Brookings Institution, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In short, it is a hard thing to be a more institutionalized imperial strategist than Haas; however, even he wrote in early April that, “I did not support the U.S. decision to intervene with military force in Libya. <em>The evidence was not persuasive that a large-scale massacre or genocide was either likely or imminent</em>.” However, he of course went on to support NATO’s efforts, as – he explained – “we are where we are.”[18]</p> <p>Long before the UN resolution 1973 and the NATO air strikes began, the Russian military, who had been monitoring events in Libya from satellites, said that Libya never launched attacks from helicopters or jets against its own civilians, and that, “as far as they are concerned, the attacks some media were reporting have never occurred.”[19] Of course, this was later confirmed by an independent investigation,[20] however the war had already been sold on the basis of such dubious reporting. Indeed, far more journalists are “stenographers of power” rather than ‘investigators of truth.’</p> <p>On March 1, the same day that the Russian military reported that there had been no jets used in attacks by Gaddafi against his own civilians, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, and the U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, gave a press conference at the Pentagon where one reporter posed the question: “Do you see any evidence that he actually has fired on his own people from the air? There were reports of it, but do you have independent confirmation? If so, to what extent?” Secretary Gates responded: “We’ve seen the press reports, but we have no confirmation of that,” and Admiral Mullen added, “That’s correct. We’ve seen no confirmation whatsoever.”[21] So even the Pentagon itself admitted that it had absolutely “no confirmation whatsoever” that jets and helicopters had been used to attack civilians, yet the whole Western world took this as de facto truth. In this, we can see the power of the media in making a case for war, where their propaganda is more absurd and manufactured than that of the Pentagon’s.</p> <p><strong>Stenographers of Power?</strong></p> <p>Glenn Greenwald, an American constitutional and civil rights lawyer who writes for <em>Salon.com</em> wrote an article about the notion of reporters as “stenographers of power.” He quoted an article entitled, “How to be a stenographer,” in which it was written:</p> <blockquote><p>If you are considering a career as a stenographer, one of the most important things that you should consider is what type of job duties stenographers have. <em>They transcribe, or type, material which they are dictated.</em> This can include orders, memos, correspondence, reports and various other types of information.[22]</p></blockquote> <p>Greenwald, in describing his own personal experience with courtroom stenographers, wrote:</p> <blockquote><p>Their defining trait is that they have a fierce devotion to transcribing accurately everything that is said and doing nothing else. It’s not uncommon for lawyers, in the heat of some dispute, to attempt to recruit the stenographer into the controversy in order to say who is right… Stenographers will never do that. They will emphasize that they are only there to write down what is said, not to resolve disputes or say what actually happened… But there’s a fundamental difference: stenographers are far better at their job, since they give equal weight to what all parties say. But <em>Time</em> and friends exist principally to trumpet government claims and minimize and belittle anything to the contrary, and they pretend to “balance” it all only when they’re caught mindlessly transcribing these one-sided claims and are forced to write down what the other side says, too. The bulk of our establishment journalists aren’t merely stenographers. They’re bad stenographers.[23]</p></blockquote> <p>Following the beginning of the Iraq war, many newspapers had to publish small pieces outlining their role as “[bad] stenographers of power” in presenting the case for war in the first place. Of course, at the time that the <em>New York Times</em>, the <em>Washington Post</em> and others were selling the war to the American people, dissenters and critics were unabashedly seeking truth and were able to assess the claims made as “false” long before the war, let alone before these news publications had “discovered” the falsities they reported. Of course, claims will always be made that “hindsight is 20/20” and “we didn’t know,” but such claims don’t stand to scrutiny when the dissenters whose voices were never heard in the Times or Post were far ahead of the media in assessing the validity of the government’s assertions. In 2004, the <em>New York Times</em> had to publish a brief report on its own pre-Iraq war coverage, stating:</p> <blockquote><p>We have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged.[24]</p></blockquote> <p>The <em>Washington Post</em> ran a similar story, detailing the attitude its editors and journalists took in the run up to the war in Iraq. It was reported that any article questioning the validity of claims made by the administration, such as the notion that there were WMDs in Iraq, wouldn’t make the front page. Bob Woodward, Assistant Managing Editor at the Post stated, “We should have warned readers we had information that the basis for this was shakier.” The article further explained:</p> <blockquote><p>Some reporters who were lobbying for greater prominence for stories that questioned the administration’s evidence complained to senior editors who, in the view of those reporters, were unenthusiastic about such pieces. The result was coverage that, despite flashes of groundbreaking reporting, in hindsight looks strikingly one-sided at times… Administration assertions were on the front page. Things that challenged the administration were on A18 on Sunday or A24 on Monday. There was an attitude among editors: Look, we’re going to war, why do we even worry about all this contrary stuff?..</p> <p>Across the country, “the voices raising questions about the war were lonely ones,” [Washington Post Executive Editor] Downie said. “We didn’t pay enough attention to the minority.”…</p> <p>From August 2002 through the March 19, 2003, launch of the war, The Post ran more than 140 front-page stories that focused heavily on administration rhetoric against Iraq. Some examples: “Cheney Says Iraqi Strike Is Justified”; “War Cabinet Argues for Iraq Attack”; “Bush Tells United Nations It Must Stand Up to Hussein or U.S. Will”; “Bush Cites Urgent Iraqi Threat”; “Bush Tells Troops: Prepare for War.”[25]</p></blockquote> <p>One story that was submitted to the Post for publication, which threw into doubt all the claims made by the U.S. administration, and which largely quoted retired military officials and outside experts, “was killed by Matthew Vita, then the national security editor and now a deputy assistant managing editor” of the Post. Karen DeYoung, a former assistant managing editor who covered the prewar diplomacy, said quite bluntly that, “Bush, Vice President Cheney and other administration officials had no problem commanding prime real estate in the paper, even when their warnings were repetitive”:</p> <blockquote><p>“<strong><em>We are inevitably the mouthpiece for whatever administration is in power</em></strong>,” DeYoung said. “If the president stands up and says something, we report what the president said.” And if contrary arguments are put “in the eighth paragraph, where they’re not on the front page, a lot of people don’t read that far.”[26]</p></blockquote> <p>There you have it, a former assistant managing editor of the Washington Post herself admitted that, “We are inevitably the mouthpiece for whatever administration is in power.” If there had ever been a clearer admission of being stenographers of power, I have yet to hear it.</p> <p>No doubt, then, that upon the militaristic adventurism of yet another war, the media is again doing what it does best: being a “mouthpiece for whatever administration is in power.” Yet, with Libya it is even more profound; sold as a “humanitarian intervention,” this war must be presented in the media as a type of “rescue” operation as opposed to an imperial adventure. This task requires all the more deception on the part of both official statements and media “mouthpieces.”</p> <p>As the saying goes, “In war, truth is the first casualty.” Indeed, it was so in Libya, and continues to be assaulted day-in day-out so long as this unjustified war continues.</p> <p><strong>Who are the Rebels?</strong></p> <p>We have been told a great many things about the rebels in Libya. We were told that they were “peaceful protesters,” that they were “nice guys,” and represented a popular uprising. From the flurry of reports about the rebels, the general ‘presentation’ given by Western governments and media was that the rebels are average Libyan civilians seeking to liberate themselves from a brutal tyrant who was indiscriminately killing them. Invariably and incessantly, the media in the West, such as the <em>Financial Times</em>, frame the forces as “pro-democracy rebels.”[27] Naturally, such assertions must be more diligently questioned and investigated. So who are the rebels? Who makes up Libya’s Transitional National Council (TNC), largely recognized by the Western nations as the “legitimate” government in Libya?</p> <p>The protests in Libya began in Benghazi on February 15, 2011. Fighting broke out between protesters and government forces, though it was naturally framed by Western media as a massacre, which ultimately turned out to be false.[28] On 27 February, the National Transition Council (NTC) (also referred to as the Transitional National Council – TNC) was formed as a consolidated effort on the part of rebel groups to form an opposition ‘government.’ The TNC immediately called for a no-fly zone to be imposed by the U.N. and for air strikes against Gaddafi forces, which the TNC claimed were committing air strikes against them, which also turned out to be false. The rebels, however, were composed of a wide array of different groups. Among them, as Political Scientist and Sociologist Mahmood Mamdani explained, are “four different political trends: radical Islamists, royalists, tribalists, and secular middle class activists produced by a Western-oriented educational system.” Further, “of these, only the radical Islamists, especially those linked organisationally to Al Qaeda, have battle experience.”[29]</p> <p>While many Western media outlets initially tried to frame the rebels as simply, “lawyers, academics, businessmen and youths,” trying to sidetrack the Islamist elements within the rebel groups, eventually the story started to slowly break, though still largely downplayed. The TNC includes many former Libyan government officials who defected to the rebel camp at the start of the fighting. As the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported at the time, “some of the officials are known in Washington and European capitals as secular, pro-Western and pro-business,” and that, “Islamists among the rebels have been largely kept out of the public spotlight, though they are believed to have support in eastern Libya and have assumed key functions in the rebel efforts.” The head of the TNC is a man named Mahmoud Jibril, a Western-educated political scientist and economist who previously headed Libya’s National Economic Development Board, “with the mandate to boost foreign investment and economic growth in country.”[30] By putting Jibril at the head of the TNC, the Council is “sending a message to foreign companies that the future Libyan government is interested in foreign investment and privatization.”[31] According to a diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks from 2009, the U.S. ambassador to Libya wrote that Jibril “gets the U.S. perspective,” as in a meeting with Jibril, he had “highlighted the need to replace the country’s decrepit infrastructure and train Libyans,” and “requested American public and private assistance to do so.” Jibril, in his pitch to the ambassador, stated that Libya “has a stable regime and is ‘virgin country’ for investors,” leading the ambassador to conclude: “we should take him up on his offer.”[32]</p> <p>Jibril and the TNC released, in late March, a document entitled, “A Vision of a Democratic Libya,” as a type of blueprint for building a ‘new’ Libya. Among the many points in the blueprint were to: “Draft a national constitution”, “Form political organisations and civil institutions including the formation of political parties, popular organisations, unions, societies and other civil and peaceful associations”, “Maintain a constitutional civil and free state by upholding intellectual and political pluralism and the peaceful transfer of power, opening the way for genuine political participation, without discrimination”, “Guarantee every Libyan citizen, of statutory age, the right to vote in free and fair parliamentary and presidential elections”, “Guarantee and respect the freedom of expression”, and a firm commitment to “political democracy.” The ‘vision’ further states that it seeks, “the development of genuine economic partnerships between a strong and productive public sector, a free private sector and a supportive and effective civil society.”[33]</p> <p>Well, that all sounds well and good, but just how truly “democratic” or “respectful” of ‘human rights’ are the rebels and the TNC? How does their purported statements of support for Libyans “without discrimination” stand up to scrutiny? How truly democratic and peaceful are these groups?</p> <p><strong>Western Intelligence and the Rebels</strong></p> <p>The rebel groups are not simply disparate, localized, and grassroots individuals rising up in support of democracy and against a brutal tyrant. In fact, from the very beginning of the fighting, many rebels have been actively supported by Western and NATO intelligence agencies and special forces, including the CIA.</p> <p>In March it was reported that the CIA had been authorized by President Obama to begin operations in Libya.[34] The CIA was reportedly sent to Libya to gather intelligence for air strikes and “to contact and vet the beleaguered rebels.” As Obama said no U.S. forces were on the ground in Libya, which itself is a direct violation of the UN resolution 1973 which authorized a no-fly zone in Libya (but directly forbade foreign troops on the ground), “small groups of C.I.A. operatives [had] been working in Libya for several weeks as part of a shadow force of Westerners that the Obama administration hopes can help bleed Colonel Qaddafi’s military,” reported the <em>New York Times</em>. As they had been in Libya “for several weeks,” they had arrived prior to even the passing of UN resolution 1973 and the imposition of a no-fly zone, indicating directly that there were no plans for peace, and war was the favoured option. Further, in the same report, it was revealed that British special forces and MI6 intelligence agents were also active in Libya. Prior to the UN resolution, which was implemented to only “protect civilians” and not to take sides in the conflict, President Obama signed a secret finding “authorizing the C.I.A. to provide arms and other support to Libyan rebels.”[35]</p> <p>The CIA officers in Libya, reported the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, are “coordinating with rebels and sharing intelligence,” and that, “the CIA has been in rebel-held areas of Libya since shortly after the U.S. Embassy in the capital, Tripoli, was evacuated in February.” As the article pointed out, in a clear indication of where the war might be headed:</p> <blockquote><p>In the early days of the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, teams of CIA officers and U.S. special operations troops entered secretly, coordinated with opposition groups and used handheld equipment to call in and aim airstrikes against the government armies.[36]</p></blockquote> <p>However, at the time, in late March, Obama and the White House were declaring that, “no decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any group in Libya.”[37] Before the UN resolution was even passed in early March, a report broke in the <em>Independent</em> which revealed a secret plan by the U.S. to arm the Libyan rebels through Saudi Arabia.[38] Also before the U.N. resolution was passed, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> revealed that, “Egypt’s military has begun shipping arms over the border to Libyan rebels with Washington’s knowledge.”[39] The Egyptian military is largely subsidized and supported by the United States, thus what it does with U.S. “knowledge” is also done with U.S. ‘consent.’</p> <p>The leader of the Libyan rebel’s military command is a man named Khalifa Hifter. As <em>McClatchy Newspapers</em> revealed in March, he had “spent the past two decades in suburban Virginia but felt compelled — even in his late-60s — to return to the battlefield in his homeland,” and explained that he had maintained, over those 20 years in Virginia, strong ties to anti-Gaddafi groups without any ‘known’ financial support, while living a mere 20 miles from CIA headquarters.[40] There is a significant amount of investigative research, largely not undertaken by the mainstream media, who largely kept Hifter’s name out of the press, that he is, in fact, an asset of the CIA, and has been for a great many years.[41] However, the <em>Guardian</em>, in April of 2011, reported that Hifter had, in the early 1980s, “joined a CIA-run anti-Gaddafi force.”[42]</p> <p><strong>Gaddafi, al-Qaeda, and … Charlie Sheen?</strong></p> <p>In late February and early March, Gaddafi was claiming that the rebel groups were linked to al-Qaeda, a claim which was largely ridiculed by Western media. Apparently, it is only the Western nations and media who have the ability to claim that all their ‘enemies’ are linked to al-Qaeda. As the <em>Guardian</em> reported on 1 March, “Muammar Gaddafi’s insistent claim that al-Qaida is behind the Libyan uprising – made in all his public appearances since the crisis began – has been dismissed at home and abroad as propaganda.” The group, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an affiliate of al-Qaeda, have long been in Libya, and have been long-opposed to Gaddafi’s rule. Established in Afghanistan in the 1990s, the group has been responsible for assassinating dozens of Libyan soldiers and policemen. At the time, MI6, the British foreign intelligence agency, was accused of supporting the LIFG in Britain’s vehement campaign to rid Libya of Gaddafi.[43]</p> <p>The Western media attempted to ridicule Gaddafi for making such claims, as <em>MSNBC</em> reported Gaddafi’s denouncement as a “rambling phone call to Libyan state TV.”[44] The media kept up its campaign, with a <em>Guardian</em> headline in early March asking readers to participate in an online questionnaire entitled, “Charlie Sheen v Muammar Gaddafi: whose line is it anyway?”[45] Or how about <em>Vanity Fair</em>, which ‘challenged’ their readers with a hard-bitten ‘journalistic’ quiz, asking, “The <em>Two and a Half Men</em> star and the Libyan dictator delivered rambling rants this week. Can you tell who said what?”[46] As the <em>National Post</em> – Canada’s vociferously imperial national newspaper – wrote in early March:</p> <blockquote><p>It’s rare that the news stories that would usually be relegated to the “bizarre news” section make it onto the front pages, but over the last few days the fantasies of two famous men have forced their way into the public consciousness. Muammar Gaddafi and Charlie Sheen have probably never met (though given the proclivity for Hollywood stars to dabble in foreign policy, you never know), but they share a number of qualities, such as a slipping grip on reality and easy access to TV interviewers through which to share their musings.[47]</p></blockquote> <p>This line of ridicule comparing Gaddafi to Charlie Sheen was repeated all over Western news media, as a simple <em>Google</em> search of both of their names will indicate, with several publications engaging in the rank-and-file self-assured ridicule, including the <em>Mirror, MSNBC, New York Magazine, The First Post, the Chicago Tribune, Life, Reuters, Salon, the Telegraph, the Atlantic, ABC News</em>, and comedy pundits like Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central, among many others. So this is what our ‘news’ media has come to, in a situation of impending war and devastation, the destruction of human life and invasion of foreign countries and occupation of foreign peoples, sending our young, largely poor domestic populations to go kill or be killed, turning their guns on other poor, forgotten peoples for the benefit of those who send them. Instead of taking an issue like “humanitarian intervention” in the proper context of a war, which like all wars, would kill inordinate amounts of innocent civilians, our media chose to engage in the disgraceful frenzy of a group joke.</p> <p>As the claims of Gaddafi were increasingly ridiculed as the crazy rants of a beleaguered psychopathic dictator (note: I am not casting doubt on the fact that he <em>IS</em> a dictator), several intermittent reports slipped through the cracks which in fact validated many of Gaddafi’s “crazy” claims.</p> <p>The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported in early April that ex-Mujahideen (CIA-trained) fighters from the Afghan-Soviet war are in Libya aiding the rebels. The ex-Mujahideen fighters that the West trained, armed and supported in Afghanistan in the 1980s are now referred to in common parlance as “al-Qaeda,” unless of course we are supporting them. Then, just as Ronald Reagan did in the 1980s, we call them “freedom fighters” or “pro-democracy protesters” in Obama’s case. In fact, the actual term “al-Qaeda”, as explained by former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, literally means “the database,” which “was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”[48] In short, al-Qaeda is a “database” of Western intelligence assets used to expand Western imperial interests around the world. They provide an excuse for intervention in countries whose governments you want to overthrow or whose people you want to prevent from ushering in a popular liberation struggle. Or, conversely, you can support them covertly in engaging in warfare against a hated regime, but invariably you would not want to refer to them as ‘al-Qaeda’ in such an instance, as it would conflict with the propagated concept of a worldwide “war on terror”, instead of what it actually is: a “war <em>of</em> terror.”</p> <p>However, as the <em>WSJ</em> reported from Beghazi, “Sufyan Ben Qumu, a Libyan army veteran who worked for Osama bin Laden’s holding company in Sudan and later for an al Qaeda-linked charity in Afghanistan, is training many of the city’s rebel recruits.” Many other officials within the rebel command come from similar backgrounds, as they make up the experienced elements of the rebel army, which is incidentally led by a CIA asset (as explained above).[49] Even a rebel leader admitted that his fighters have al-Qaeda links, as reported by the <em>Telegraph</em>.[50] Further, a senior American Admiral, and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander (leading the attack on Libya), admitted that al-Qaeda was among the rebels.[51]</p> <p>Yet, while these admissions surfaced in the mainstream media, once reported, in true Orwellian fashion, they were cast into the “memory hole,” all but forgotten. Thus, when any reference or indeed dissenter continues to refer to the rebel’s links to al-Qaeda, they are cast aside as a “crackpot” or a “conspiracy theorist.” It may have even been the very news outlet which is denouncing such claims that actually reported them as fact in the first place. The <em>National Post</em> recently engaged in a hit-piece against independent journalists who were based in Tripoli covering events and views unwanted by the NATO powers. In ridiculing these reports of NATO involvement with al-Qaeda linked rebels, the <em>National Post </em>journalist stated, cynically, “No massive popular uprising, no victorious rebels flooding into Tripoli greeted by throngs of well-wishers among the city’s populace. It was a NATO – Al Qaida job.”[52]</p> <p>The writer went on to denounce my former employers and colleagues at the Centre for Research on Globalization as “a Canadian clubhouse for crackpots of the anti-war, 911-truth, anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist variety. The Centre would not normally be worth noticing except for a laugh.” Seemingly, in the eyes of Terry Glavin and the <em>National Post</em>, “anti-war” and “anti-imperialist” sentiments are the intellectual bastion of “crackpots.” What, might I ask, does that say about the <em>National Post</em>? Personally, the label of “anti-war” and “anti-imperialist” is not an insult to me, nor to my former colleagues; it is a badge of honour, a source of pride and a directive for action. The framing of such anti-war and anti-imperialist sentiments as a ‘negative’ label, indeed says more about the <em>National Post</em> than it does about Global Research and its writers.</p> <p><strong>Is this a Popular Democratic Uprising?</strong></p> <p>The <em>National Post</em> refers to the rebels as a “massive popular uprising” of “victorious rebels” who entered Tripoli “greeted by throngs of well-wishers among the city’s populace,” perhaps we should ask if this is indeed the case. Scott Taylor, a Canadian journalist writing for the <em>Halifax Chronicle-Herald</em> in late August, observed (and it is worth quoting at some length):</p> <blockquote><p>The rebellion in Libya has been more of a media war than a full-scale armed clash… To prevent Gaddafi from inflicting reprisals on the rebels, the UN authorized a NATO-enforced no-fly zone over Libya to protect unarmed civilians from being bombed. That, of course, <em>did not apply to civilians living in Gadhafi-controlled sectors</em>, as the Canadian-led NATO coalition soon began mounting airstrikes against government targets.</p> <p>For more than five months now NATO planes have supported the rebels, and NATO warships have enforced a one-sided arms embargo against Gadhafi’s forces. And all foreign-held Libyan financial assets have been frozen, making it virtually impossible for Libya to purchase any war materiel, or even basic necessities such as fuel…</p> <p>On a fact-finding trip into Tripoli last week, I saw first-hand that Gaddafi has solidified his control over the capital and most of western Libya. Foreign diplomats still based in Tripoli confirmed to me that, since NATO started bombing, <em>Gaddafi support and approval ratings have actually soared to about 85 per cent</em>.</p> <p>Of the 2,335 tribes in Libya, over 2,000 are still pledging their allegiance to the embattled president. At present, it is the gasoline shortage due to the embargo and lack of electricity from NATO’s bombing that are causing the most hardship to Libyans inside Gadhafi-controlled sectors.</p> <p>However, at present, the people still blame NATO — not Gaddafi — for the shortages. In an effort to combat that sentiment and to encourage a popular uprising against Gadhafi, NATO planes have taken to dropping leaflets in canisters over the streets of Tripoli. Unfortunately for the NATO planning staff, the canisters are heavy enough to cause injury and damage roofs when they plummet to the ground…</p> <p>It is possible that the continued embargo, shortage of fuel and downgrading of Libyan utilities will create a humanitarian crisis inside Gadhafi’s Libya so severe that his followers have no choice but to turn on him for their own survival. However, if that indeed transpires it will be impossible for the West to justify this as being a humanitarian intervention.[53]</p></blockquote> <p>It is no surprise that Gaddafi’s support has risen to such extreme levels, as this tends to be the case whenever a country is bombed and attacked by an outside imperial power. It is also no wonder that Gaddafi has such strong support among his people when one considers the human toll of fighting. Reports vary on the amount of deaths, both combatant and civilian, but in early June, the U.N. Human Rights Council mission to Tripoli reported that between 10-15,000 people have been killed in the fighting thus far.[54] Reports of NATO strikes killing civilians do not help “win the hearts and minds” of Libyans, especially when one such strike killed over 85 innocent civilians, including 33 children.[55] Also in June, the Italian Foreign Minister, following a NATO bombing of a house in Tripoli, declared, “NATO is endangering its credibility,” and in an extrapolation of how the West is losing the ‘propaganda war’, he stated, “We cannot continue our shortcomings <em>in the way we communicate with the public</em>, which doesn’t keep up with the daily propaganda of Gaddafi.”[56]</p> <p><strong>‘Worthy’ vs. ‘Unworthy’ Victims: Are the Rebels Committing ‘Ethnic Cleansing’?</strong></p> <p>A typical propaganda tactic used by Western media, throughout the entire Cold War (and arguably much longer) is the notion of “worthy” and “unworthy” victims. In any conflict in which the Western world engages and seeks a particular outcome, the presentation to the public – (i.e., propaganda) – determines, by the very way in which it reports the conflict, who are the “good guys” and who are the “bad guys.” It is important for conflicts to be framed – from the view of the propagandist – in a black and white, simplified manner. Effective propaganda tends to play to the lowest common denominator. If everything is geared towards a very base, simplified audience, with minimal critical thinking and contemplation required, it tends to manifest those very sensibilities in the audience who consumes it. In short, by the very method of reporting, they create the audience they seek.</p> <p>Make it simple to create a simple audience. Then, that which is contrary to the saturated and filtered version of ‘reality’ is simply rejected outright as lunacy, fantasy, conspiracy theory, or worse. It is rejected almost instinctively because it requires more effort to determine accuracy, to investigate claims, to understand much broader concepts and employ far more contemplation and thinking than is required by the propaganda system. It is not simply that the ‘truth’ itself is more complicated, which makes lies so appealing to the masses, but it is exactly because the<em> method </em>of investigating truth is far more complicated. Thus, setting back into the comforts of ‘simplicity’ (“let the TV tell me what to think”), is far more attractive an option than taking painstaking efforts to investigate and understand an issue.</p> <p>Thus, in conflicts we come to the nomenclature of ‘worthy’ versus ‘unworthy’ victims. This allows the West – and the public especially – to “take sides” in a conflict before understanding the realities of the conflict itself. That way, intervention can be justified and assured. Strategy, more today than ever before, requires the need of an efficient, organized, and effective propaganda machine. In Israel-Palestine, Israeli citizens and even soldiers (within the Occupied Territories) are deemed as ‘worthy victims’, while Palestinians are deemed ‘unworthy’ victims. When an Israeli dies, whether a civilian or soldier, the media ensures that the ‘consumer’ knows the names, is exposed to the families, learns the ambitions and dreams of the victims. When Palestinians die, however, they become – if at all even reported – mere statistics, and more often than not, they are blamed for their own deaths, vilified and generally dehumanized. The Palestinians are the ‘unworthy’ victims.</p> <p>In Libya, it is apparent that the rebels are ‘worthy victims’, while the majority of civilians, (as roughly 85% support Gaddafi) are deemed ‘unworthy’ victims. The deaths of rebels are often hyped and exaggerated; others are denied, underplayed, justified, or simply not covered at all.</p> <p>The best example of this in the current conflict is the rebels themselves committing atrocities, particularly against black African migrants in Libya. In this scenario, rebels remain the ‘worthy’ victims, and the black Africans ‘unworthy.’ This disparity is increased in that the deaths of black Africans were not only largely ignored, but they were first demonized, and thus their deaths became justified. This was the basis for the propaganda rhetoric regarding Gaddafi’s “African mercenaries.” These stories proliferated through the Western media <em>ad nauseum</em> and largely unquestioned; they were accepted at face value. As an Amnesty International investigation revealed, the stories of African mercenaries massacring rebels for Gaddafi emerged largely from the rebels themselves, and as it turned out, was false.[57]</p> <p>A <em>Google</em> search of “African mercenaries” and “Libya” from February 15 (when the rebellion began) to March 30, less than two weeks following the NATO ‘intervention’, turned up over 86,000 matches. As it turned out, the “mercenaries” were in fact African migrants working in Libya. A <em>Google </em>search over the same period (Feb. 15 – March 30), but with the terms “African migrants” and “Libya” revealed just under 48,000 results. Yet, from as early as February, African migrants reported that, “they’ve become targets for Libyans who are enraged that African mercenaries are fighting on behalf of the regime.” The migrants work in Libya’s oil industry and certain other sectors. It was the reports of African mercenaries – which later turned out to be false – that induced the violence against African migrants, instead of simply justifying them. The Deputy Director of the North Africa Center at Cambridge University stated in late February, in an interview with <em>NPR</em>, “I tell you, these people, because of their skin, they will be slaughtered in Libya. There is so much anger there against those mercenaries, which suddenly sprung up. I think it is urgent to do something about it now, otherwise, a genocide [could occur] against anyone who has black skin and who doesn’t speak perfect Arabic.”[58]</p> <p><em>Al-Jazeera</em> reported in late February that dozens of black Africans were killed, with hundreds more in hiding, as “anti-government protesters” (read: ‘worthy victims’) “hunt down” the “black African mercenaries” (read: ‘unworthy victims’). Migrants fleeing the violence who returned to their home countries were interviewed, and reported that, “We were being attacked by local people who said that we were mercenaries killing people. Let me say that they did not want to see black people.” Further, one witness reported, “Our camp was burnt down, and we were assisted by the Kenyan embassy and our company to get to the airport.” A Senior Fellow with the International Migration Institute posed the question:</p> <blockquote><p>But why is nobody concerned about the plight of sub-Saharan African migrants in Libya? As victims of racism and ruthless exploitation, they are Libya’s most vulnerable immigrant population, and their home country governments do not give them any support.[59]</p></blockquote> <p>These cases were rarely reported in Western media, however, African media sources reported much more diligently on these events, as they were more directly effecting their own citizens; thus, the victims are those who may deemed – in the African media – as ‘worthy victims.’ Thus, the coverage was much more extensive. One African media outlet reported in early March, that “rebel fighters and their supporters in eastern Libya are detaining, beating and intimidating African immigrants and black Libyans, accusing them of being African mercenaries.” In some instances, “rebels have executed suspected mercenaries captured in battle, according to Human Rights Watch and local Libyans.” Even the rebel-led government “concedes it is rounding up suspects and detaining them for questioning.” Not only is it African migrants who were in danger, but regular black Libyans as well, as in some cases rebels had lynched black Africans, claiming they were mercenaries. Human Rights Watch referred to the assault against black Libyans as “widespread and systematic attacks… by rebels and their supporters.” A Human Rights Watch official explained, “thousands of Africans have come under attack and lost their homes and possessions during the recent fighting,” and referred to the rebels (who are, in our media mostly referred to as ‘pro-democracy’ protesters) as “ad hoc military and security forces.”[60]</p> <p>Another report explained that the assaults against blacks have “revived a deep-rooted racism between Arabs and black Africans” in Libya, as “discrimination is common not only against migrant Black Africans, but also against darker-skinned Libyans, especially from the south of the country.” The Executive Director of the Afro-Middle East Centre in South Africa told <em>IPS</em> in late March, “Against this background, one needs to be a little wary of the accusations of ‘African mercenaries’ or even ‘Black African mercenaries’ that have been bandied around.” Further, he reported that, “about one and a half million Sub-Saharan African migrants and refugees, out of a population of nearly two to two and a half million migrants, work as cheap labour in Libya’s oil industry, agriculture, construction and other service sectors.” As it turned out, “this is not the first time Libya’s most vulnerable immigrant population has fallen victim to racist attack,” as in 2000, “dozens of migrant workers from Ghana, Cameroon, Sudan, Niger, Burkina Faso, Chad and Nigeria were targeted during street killings in the wake of government officials blaming them for rising crime, disease and drug trafficking.”[61]</p> <p>One apparent victim of these assaults told media that, “I bet you many Ghanaians and Nigerians and other nationals of south of the Sahara have been killed and murdered,” and further, “they put the dead bodies in mass graves, while they still pursued others. Sometimes we had to dig deep and wide holes to hide ourselves for fear of being identified by the opposition forces.”[62] By early March, there were reports of hundreds of black Africans from over a dozen countries who landed at Nairobi Airport after fleeing Libya by plane, and were arriving “with horrific tales of violence.”[63] Even in early March, Human Rights Watch told the <em>Sydney-Morning Herald</em> that they were “yet to confirm a single case of a mercenary being used in the conflict.” Even as reports spread out regarding Gaddafi’s “African mercenaries,” Human Rights Watch stated that, “of the hundreds of suspected mercenaries detained in the east, all had turned out to be innocent workers or Libyans in the regular army.”[64]</p> <p>The most high-profile coverage in the West perhaps came from the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, in which the reporter had been led by the rebels to view some of their captured “mercenaries,” and the reporter wrote that the so-called mercenaries told the media, “We are construction workers,” as they pleaded their innocence, and then “the interview was abruptly ended and the group of Africans were led away to detention by Muhammed Bala, who described himself as a security officer for the rebel government.” Bala added, “We’re out looking for mercenaries every day.”[65]</p> <p>Some reports in late March suggested that black Africans had been “slaughtered in the thousands in the ongoing civil war in Libya.”[66] As the rebels claimed that Gaddafi’s forces were engaging in mass rape, other reports (otherwise unconfirmed) reported that the rebels were themselves, were starting “to detain, insult, rape and even executing black immigrants, students and refugees,” stating that more than 100 Africans were killed by early March, and “some of them were led into the desert and stabbed to death,” while other “black Libyan men receiving medical care in hospitals in Benghazi were reportedly abducted by armed rebels.” Further, there were “more than 200 African immigrants held in secret locations by the rebels.” As the <em>Somaliland Press</em> reported in early March, the attacks reflect racist and xenophobic attitudes among many Arabs in Libya (specifically the east, where the rebels were largely based), some of which was a result of Gaddafi’s ‘pan-Africanist’ views, which many Arabs felt betrayed by:</p> <blockquote><p>In many situations, Gaddafi and his inner circle preferred black Africans and Libyans from the south over Libyans from the east. Now the angry mobs using the revolutionary movement across Arabia and North Africa are hunting down black people.</p> <p>Mohamed Abdillahi, Somaliland, 25, was sleeping at his home in Zouara, when the mobs arrived. “They knocked on the door around 1 o’clock in the morning. They said get out, we’ll kill you, you are blacks, foreigners, clear.”</p> <p>The testimonials are very similar among the thousands of Africans that saw the ugly side of Libya in the past weeks. “They have attacked us, they took everything from us,” said Ali Farah, Somali labourer 29 years…</p> <p>Many of the fleeing Africans are terrified to tell their stories. At the checkpoint, they do not mingle with others. When asked about their ordeal, they just freeze, “they stopped us many times and said not tell what has happened here, say there are no problems,” Elias Nour from Ethiopia said.[67]</p></blockquote> <p>Of all the publications, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported in late June that within the rebel-held city of Misrata, black Libyans were being targeted by the rebels who were ethnically cleansing Misrata of its black population. Espousing the lies that the black Libyans from Tawergha, a small mostly black town 25 miles south of Misrata, were being used as mercenaries, this galvanized the rebels and their supporters against them, referring to them as “traitors.” Prior to the siege of Misrata, roughly four-fifths of the population in the poor housing project of Misrata’s Ghoushi neighbourhood were black Tawergha natives. Now, reported the <em>WSJ</em>, “they are gone or in hiding, fearing revenge attacks by Misratans, amid reports of bounties for their capture.” The rebel leadership in Benghazi reportedly stated that they were working on a “post-Gadhafi reconciliation plan,” yet claim that, “Libya is one tribe.” Some were calling for the expulsion of the Tawerghans from the area, and one rebel commander said, “They should pack up… Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata.” As further evidence of the increasingly ethnically focused rebel leadership, some “rebel leaders are also calling for drastic measures like banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata.” One rebel slogan that has appeared on the road between Misrata and Tawergha refers to the rebels as “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin.”[68]</p> <p>It is thus a very legitimate concern that if the rebels take power in Libya, they may undertake an “ethnic cleansing” of Libya in order to eliminate threats to their power (as the black Libyans by and large are supportive of Gaddafi), as well as to have a convenient scapegoat target population upon whom they can place blame for all the ills that a post-Gaddafi Libya would surely face. Scapegoats are always necessary for leaders that seek to centralize their power and brutally enforce their rule. Totalitarian leaders throughout history have always employed such a tactic. The possibility of a rebel-led government committing ethnic cleansing in Libya is, I think, an imminent and extremely likely possibility.</p> <p>By mid-March, the United Nations reported that black migrants were fleeing Libya at a rate of about 6,000 a day, while “some 280,000 have already escaped to neighboring states.”[69] As one report in Uganda articulated, a major concern for European nations (who are actively engaged in the NATO assault) was in the possible exodus of black Africans into Europe, as Libya is one of the main routes for African immigrants into Western Europe, a major source of internal social stratification, xenophobia, racism, and political pressure. Thus, if Libya collapsed into a “state of lawlessness,” it could become a major problem for Western Europe. As one <em>BBC</em> reporter stated, “The fear with Libya is that sub-Saharan Africans will try to leave and there are more of them.” The Ugandan <em>Independent</em> reported that following the stories in the Western press about the “African immigrant” came the stories about the “African mercenary.”[70]</p> <p>In fact, the West European media did prominently feature stories about the impending ‘threat’ of a wave of African immigrants into their countries. An article in the major German publication, <em>Der Spiegel</em>, in late February reported that, “Moammar Gadhafi, in recent years, has enjoyed a cynical role as Europe’s border guard against African immigrants. Italian ministers now warn that if his Libyan government collapses, people will flow across the Mediterranean.” Italy’s Interior Minister, ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, warned that, “hundreds of thousands of immigrants could head for Europe” which would create a “catastrophic humanitarian emergency.” While immediately fearing a wave of immigrants due to “violence that Moammar Gadhafi’s regime has reportedly visited on its own people.” But, according to some observers, “if Libya collapses into anarchy… it could become an immigration route for far more people from sub-Saharan Africa.” <em>Der Spiegel </em>reported:</p> <blockquote><p>Gadhafi in recent years has played up his role as a bulwark against African immigrants to Europe. Italy and Libya began joint naval patrols in 2008 to stop boatloads of illegal or trafficked immigrants from crossing the Mediterranean, and last year Libya signed a 50 billion euro deal with the European Union to manage its borders as a “transit country” for sub-Saharan Africans.</p> <p>Italian Foreign Minister Frattini said that some 2.5 million people in Libya — about a third of the population — are non-Libyan immigrants who would flee if the government fell.</p> <p>Gadhafi himself has enjoyed stoking these fears. “Europe will become black,” he said last December, if European leaders failed to cooperate with him on immigration controls.[71]</p></blockquote> <p>The fear of a wave of African immigrants into Europe was a major topic of discussion at the EU summit in Brussels in February, according to the <em>Financial Times</em>.[72] EU ministers heard that, “the collapse of Colonel Gaddafi’s regime could result in a tidal wave of refugees and illegal immigrants pouring into Europe,” as roughly 1-2 million refugees “could attempt to make their way across the Mediterranean into southern Europe if the Gaddafi regime collapses.” The Italian Foreign Minister told the members at the EU summit:</p> <blockquote><p>We are following very closely the situation. Italy as you know is the closest neighbour, both of Tunisia and Libya, so we are extremely concerned about the repercussions on the migratory situation in the southern Mediterranean… We need a European comprehensive action plan. We should support all peaceful transitional processes that are ongoing in the Middle East while avoiding a patronising position.[73]</p></blockquote> <p>The Minister further warned that, the collapse of the regime would lead to the “self proclamation of the so-called Islamic emirate of Benghazi.” He added: “I’m very concerned about the idea of dividing Libya in two, in Cyrenaica and in Tripoli. That would be really dangerous. Can you imagine having an Islamic Arab emirate on the borders of Europe? This would be a really serious threat.” The Czech Foreign Minister echoed this fear, warning that the fall of Gadhaffi could pave the way for “bigger catastrophes.”[74] <strong></strong></p> <p>The rebels are aided in their war – which is largely a “propaganda war”[75] – by an American public relations firm “to help them earn recognition from the U.S. government.” The firm – the Harbour Group – in early April “signed a pro-bono contract with the National Transitional Council.” Pro-bono? Since when do public relations firms do charity work? In an article in the <em>Hill</em>, it was reported that Harbour Group “will be working with the council’s U.S. representative, Ali Aujali, who resigned as Libya’s ambassador to the U.S. in protest in February as the revolution began to hold.” The Harbour Group’s Managing Director Richard Mintz “will help manage the PR effort on behalf of the council.” Mintz told <em>The Hill</em>, “It’s the right thing to do. They need help and we are pleased that we are able to do that. It is in the U.S.’s interest, in the world’s interest.” Part of the firm’s work was to be aimed at gaining U.S. recognition of the TNC as the “legitimate” government in Libya, while “other goals for the Harbour Group are to encourage U.S. humanitarian aid to Libya and to push for the release of Gadhafi’s assets frozen by U.S. financial institutions to help pay for that aid.” The article went on:</p> <blockquote><p>To achieve those goals, the firm will help prepare speeches, press releases and op-eds, contact reporters and think tanks and develop a website and social media for the council.</p> <p>According to the contract, the firm “will provide all of its professional services free of charge to the council,” though the council will be “directly responsible” for “major expenses,” such as Web design and travel.</p> <p>The Harbour Group is plugged in politically — Mintz is a former director of public affairs for the Clinton administration’s Transportation Department — and is already familiar with the Middle East. The firm is helping to implement “a public diplomacy program” on behalf of the Embassy of the United Arab Emirates, according to Justice records.[76]</p></blockquote> <p>In early July, Patton Boggs, the number one lobby firm in the United States, was hired by the rebels to promote their cause in the U.S., to get America to recognize the TNC as the “legitimate government” in Libya, as well as to unfreeze Libya’s assets in order to provide funds for them. One outside counsel at Patton Boggs stated, “We care about the cause… We want the Transitional National Council to succeed on behalf of all the Libyan people… We are proud that they selected us in assisting them and we hope that we can continue being effective for them.” According to an article in <em>The Hill</em>, a Washington-D.C. paper, “Thomas Hale Boggs Jr., a partner at the firm who is one of Washington’s top lobbyists, will be leading the Libya account.” Boggs wrote that, “We understand that at this time the [Transitional National] Council may not have sufficient funds to pay our fees for these important services… We will charge the Council on an hourly basis for our work, according to our customary hourly billable rates… [and] will not seek payment for these funds and costs until the Council obtains sufficient funds to pay for them.” Further:</p> <blockquote><p>Two lobbyists at Patton Boggs, Stephen McHale and Vincent Frillici, have filed so far to lobby on behalf of the council. Frillici previously served as the director of operations at NATO for the 50th Anniversary Host Committee and was deputy director of finance operations for the Democratic National Convention in 1996. McHale served as the first deputy administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and helped merge the administration into the Homeland Security Department.</p> <p>Robert Kapla, who has represented foreign governments in the past, and Matthew Oresman, formerly a law clerk within the State Department and the Senate Judiciary Committee, will also work for the council…</p> <p>Announcing recognition of the Libyan council would cut Gadhafi off from any legal legitimacy, allow the rebels access to funding to help the Libyan people and announce to the international community that only the rebels have the right to “transfer the country’s natural resources,” [Patton Boggs counsel David]Tafuri wrote in a <em>Washington Post</em> editorial.[77]</p></blockquote> <p>The notion that a rag-tag group of rebels fighting a war in a far-off foreign nation know exactly who the best lobbying firm and one of the best PR firms in Washington, D.C. are is hard to believe. The decision to contact these firms, then, was likely suggested by an American voice. As reported, the point man of contact between both firms and the rebels is Ali Aujali, the former Libyan Ambassador to the United States, who clearly still maintains his close ties to Washington.</p> <p>Sure enough, in July the United States recognized the rebels as the “legitimate” government in Libya.[78] And now in August, there are major pushes for Libya’s frozen assets to be unfrozen for the new rebel government.[79]</p> <p><strong>Could Libya Collapse?</strong></p> <p>Naturally, to prevent such a “catastrophe” as a “tidal wave” of African immigrants, the Europeans – who are now fully involved in the Libyan war – will need to push for an occupation of Libya. While most ad-hoc coalitions try to maintain some vestiges of unity until their initial objectives (overthrowing the state) are achieved, the Libyan rebels have already descended into infighting and murder. In late July, members of the rebel armed forces killed the commander of the armed forces, Abdel Fatah Younis, who was a former Libyan government official who defected to the rebels in the early days of protests.[80]</p> <p>This event “triggered fears that opposition fighters battling to oust Col Muammar Gaddafi could instead turn their weapons on each other.” When news spread, many units who were loyal to Younis abandoned their front line posts at the oil town of Brega, and poured into Benghazi “to avenge their commander’s death.” The TNC attempted to blame the murder on pro-Gaddafi loyalists, but his supporters believed he was killed by “his rivals within the rebel leadership.” Some of the supporters even fired on the hotel in Benghazi which the TNC leader and a favourite of the U.S., Abdul-Jalil, earlier gave a press conference. The General, when he was killed, was headed to defend himself in front of four rebel judges who were questioning “illicit contacts he may have had with the Gaddafi regime,” which were instigated when the <em>Daily Telegraph</em> reported that he was “the regime’s main point of contact with the rebels.” As another <em>Telegraph</em> article revealed, “Gen Younes was also engaged in a very public feud with the rebels’ most celebrated battlefield commander, Khalifa Hifter,” which “was seen as an important factor in the pervasive chaos along the front line as the two frequently countermanded one another’s orders.” Thus, the elimination of the General could possibly allow for “greater cohesion” among the rebels on the front lines.[81] Unreported in that article, however, was the previously revealed fact that Khalifa Hifter, the man who profits most from the assassination, also has a long history of working with the CIA.[82]</p> <p>Yet, it would still appear inevitable, with remaining divisions among the rebels and competing and contradictory ideas of what a post-Gaddafi Libya would be like, infighting will continue and likely accelerate. There is the possibility of a scenario in which one faction, and most likely the most militant and well-quipped faction (being the Islamist, al-Qaeda-linked faction run by a CIA-operative), simply purges the rebels entirely of competing visions. This assassination could have been the start of that effort already, and even a warning to potential challengers. Regardless of the specifics, the Libyan war is likely to plunge into a total civil war, so the Western nations would perhaps be most interested in having a united, militant, and ruthless proxy army under one leadership and vision, not many. With such enormous support for Gaddafi remaining in the country, and in fact, accelerating as the NATO bombings and rebel attacks continue, a rapid overthrowing of the Gaddafi government would certainly spark major national unrest far more severe than at present. In such a power vacuum, the Western powers certainly want to ensure the group they backed will be the winning horse on the way to fill the empty seat of power.</p> <p>Western government have recognized the TNC as the “legitimate” government of the Libyan people, while the Libyan people – to the tune of 85% – largely support Gaddafi.[83] So, in the face of such enormous opposition, this ‘horse’ in the race would by necessity have to be brutal, exacting, precise, and ruthless. If they do not seize power instantly, and establish a firm control over the country, it would be likely that the nation would plunge into a vicious civil war. Further, if Gaddafi supporters quickly regain the seat of power, Western powers may seek to stoke and actively create the conditions for civil war. It is arguable that they are attempting to do this already. In such a case, it would – from the imperial perspective – be better to ‘divide’ the people among each other, and ‘rule’ over them as a justification for maintaining ‘order.’ In this instance, using recent precedents of the past decades – two conflicts which Western powers claim they “don’t” want Libya to turn into – Rwanda and Iraq, became likely outcomes. Either a situation in which a Western-supported rebel army rushes to power amid a massive wave of carnage and establishes a strong dictatorship, ultimately resulting in the ‘cleansing’ of opponents to the potential of genocide (such as with U.S. support for the RPF in Rwanda). Or, there could be an attempt to establish a liberal democratic government, with a mix of rebels and former government officials, yet dividing power among ethnic or tribal lines, further inflaming those very divisions, and possibly resulting in a total civil war (such as in Iraq). Further, if pro-Gaddafi supporters re-take power quickly and effectively, the rebels would likely go underground and attempt a more insurgent war, attempting to plunge the country into a civil war. The dismantling of Yugoslavia also presents a telling example. In this case, ethnic or tribal rivalries are inflamed, al-Qaeda-linked radical sects are actively armed and aided; these groups engage in ethnic cleansing and a territorial war, with the country ultimately breaking up into several small and easily manageable parts. In whichever case, the potential for Western troops on the ground in Libya is a stark reality.</p> <p><strong>The Occupation of Libya</strong></p> <p>In late August, Libyan rebels rapidly advanced on Tripoli, preceded by a massive NATO bombardment of the city. The operation – <em>Mermaid Dawn</em> – was planned weeks in advance by the rebels and NATO. As the <em>Guardian</em> reported: “British military and civilian advisers, including special forces troops, along with those from France, Italy and Qatar, have spent months with rebel fighters, giving them key, up-to-date intelligence,” though the article then claimed that they were also “watching out for any al-Qaida elements trying to infiltrate the rebellion,” ignoring, of course, that we have long been supporting the ‘infiltrated’ elements. One of the rebel organizers of the operation said, “Honestly, Nato played a very big role in liberating Tripoli. They bombed all the main locations that we couldn’t handle with our light weapons.” While “sleeper cells rose up and rebel soldiers advanced on the city, Nato launched targeted bombings,” and American hunter-killer drones were also used in the attacks. According to a NATO diplomat, “Covert special forces teams from Qatar, France, Britain and some east European states provided critical assistance, such as logisticians, forward air controllers for the rebel army, as well as damage-assessment analysts and other experts.” Foreign military advisers were on the ground providing “real-time intelligence to the rebels,” or in other words, ‘directing’ the rebels. Apparently, Gaddafi aides attempted to communicate with Obama administration officials, including the Ambassador and Jeffrey Feltman, the Assistant Secretary of State, in order to “broker a truce.” Yet, reported the <em>Guardian</em>, “the calls were not taken seriously.” NATO warplanes bombed convoys of Libyan troops as they sought to re-take rebel advances within Tripoli and elsewhere, and further, NATO undertook “<em>bombing raids on bunkers set up in civilian buildings in Tripoli</em>.” The article continued:</p> <blockquote><p>The western advisers are expected to remain in Libya, advising on how to maintain law and order on the streets, and on civil administration, following Gaddafi’s downfall. They have learned the lessons of Iraq, when the US got rid of all prominent officials who had been members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath party and dissolved the Iraqi army and security forces.[84]</p></blockquote> <p>The rebels who helped in planning the operation had hoped that an invasion of Tripoli would have sparked an uprising among the people, joining with the rebels against Gaddafi, clearly indicating their own ignorance of the support for Gaddafi within Libya and especially Tripoli. The <em>New York Times</em>, explaining why the mass popular uprising never took place, claimed that it was a result of “a bloody crackdown on protesters in February by Colonel Qaddafi’s forces [which] had served as a grim deterrent to those inside Tripoli who might try to challenge the government’s authority.”[85] Naturally, the <em>New York Times</em> failed to report, as Amnesty International confirmed, that those reports were largely exaggerated, and there were deaths on both sides, indicating that the “peaceful protesters” had – at least a few – fighters among them.</p> <p>With British and French Special Forces troops on the ground alongside CIA operatives, NATO was integral in launching this “pincer” campaign in Libya, often bombing government troops in retreat.[86] Britain played a strong role with both military and intelligence officials – Special Forces and MI6 – in planning and coordinating the assault on Tripoli. As the <em>Telegraph</em> reported, “MI6 officers based in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi had honed battle plans drawn up by Libya’s Transitional National Council (TNC) which were agreed 10 weeks ago,” while “the RAF stepped up raids on Tripoli on Saturday morning [August 20] in a pre-arranged plan to pave the way for the rebel advance.” Before the official rebel attack even began, the RAF bombed a key communications facility in Tripoli “as part of the agreed battle plan.”[87] It is likely that in a rebel government, two prominent factions, that which is composed of the former Libyan National Army, founded and now currently run by Khalifa Hafter, a CIA asset; and the Islamist al-Qaeda linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), both of which are currently supported through the TNC by the CIA, MI6, and NATO military structures.[88] <strong></strong></p> <p>So while it is clear that not only are NATO forces already in Libya, but they are in fact directing the operations of rebel forces, far beyond the mandate from the United Nations to simply “protect civilians.” But then, that wasn’t the point of the war.</p> <p>Even as the rebels continue to fight in Tripoli, Western media has jubilantly and prematurely declared a victory for the rebels and for NATO. The <em>Washington Post</em> reported that the ‘lesson of Libya’ was that, “limited intervention can work.”[89] But then, this is no surprise from the <em>Post</em>, considering that one of their editors had previously said, “We are inevitably the mouthpiece for whatever administration is in power.”[90] As the rebels were far from victorious – though victory had already been declared – the media engaged in a ‘discussion’ of “post-Gaddafi Libya.” Meanwhile, fighting continued in the streets of Tripoli, as one resident told the <em>Independent</em>, “The rebels are attacking our homes. This should not be happening,” and further:</p> <blockquote><p>The rebels are saying they are fighting government troops here, but all those getting hurt are ordinary people, the only buildings being damaged are those of local people. There has also been looting by the rebels, they have gone into houses to search for people and taken away things. Why are they doing this? They should be looking for Gaddafi, he is not here.[91]</p></blockquote> <p>While British SAS Special Forces were on the ground in Libya helping to hunt down Gaddafi, the British Foreign Secretary declared that, “Gaddafi must accept defeat,” and President Sarkozy of France said, “Gaddafi’s time has run out.”[92] Average Libyans in Tripoli were nervous with the celebratory rebels, claiming, “The situation here reminds me of Iraq in 2003,” and that, “We don’t know who has entered the city. We don’t know anything about the people who will rule this country, about their mentality.” As one resident explained to the <em>Independent</em>:</p> <blockquote><p>The past 42 years we knew everything about the country: our people, our politics, everything. Now we don’t know anything about the future. We are afraid of the end of this, that Gaddafi will use chemical weapons, that there will be a massacre. I am afraid of both sides – of the rebels and of Gaddafi… We have no safety in this city. Now most of the people in this area have left. There are no families in the building now, just the young men.[93]</p></blockquote> <p>Robert Fisk, writing in the <em>Independent</em>, drew several parallels between Libya and Iraq, such as the fact when the Americans took Baghdad, Saddam fled underground promising to fight to the death, as Gaddafi just did. Further, as the U.S. was faced with the birth of the Iraqi insurgency in 2003, officials and media pundits alike claimed that the insurgents were “die-hards” who apparently “didn’t realise that the war was over.” As Fisk observed, already a pundit on <em>SkyNews</em> in Britain had claimed the remaining fighters were “die-hards.” Fisk repudiates the notion, as repeated throughout the media and by Western officials, that it is now “up to the Libyans,” as amidst “the massive presence of Western diplomats, oil-mogul representatives, highly paid Western mercenaries and shady British and French servicemen – all pretending to be ‘advisers’ rather than participants – is the Benghazi Green Zone.” Fisk explained:</p> <blockquote><p>Of course, this war is not the same as our perverted invasion of Iraq. Saddam’s capture only provoked the resistance to infinitely more attacks on Western troops – because those who had declined to take part in the insurgency for fear that the Americans would put Saddam back in charge of Iraq now had no such inhibitions. But Gaddafi’s arrest along with Saif’s would undoubtedly hasten the end of pro-Gaddafi resistance to the rebels. The West’s real fear – right now, and this could change overnight – should be the possibility that the author of the Green Book [Gaddafi] has made it safely through to his old stomping ground in Sirte, where tribal loyalty might prove stronger than fear of a Nato-backed Libyan force.[94]</p></blockquote> <p>Sirte, Fisk elaborated, is an oil rich region with a strongly pro-Gaddafi populace. It was in Sirte where the rebels were defeated by the loyalists in the current war. However, as Fisk opined, “we shall soon, no doubt, have to swap these preposterous labels – when those who support the pro-Western Transitional National Council will have to be called loyalists, and pro-Gaddafi rebels turn into the ‘terrorists’ who may attack our new Western-friendly Libyan administration.”[95]</p> <p>NATO officials stated that the alliance “will not put troops on the ground,” ignoring the fact that already there are special forces and intelligence operatives on the ground who have been there for several months since even before the war broke out. Though, NATO officials claimed that if any organization sends in troops, it would be the UN, with one official commenting, “It is a classic case for blue helmets,” and that, “Nato will help the UN if asked.” The Western “advisers,” according to NATO officials, “are expected to remain in Libya, advising on how to maintain law and order on the streets, and on civil administration, following Gaddafi’s downfall.”[96]</p> <p>The <em>Telegraph</em> reported that, “Britain is preparing to send a team to Tripoli to help with a key plan to stabilise Libya after the fall of the Gaddafi regime and prevent any repeat of the chaos seen in post-war Iraq.” Thus, the Western nations are engaging in double-speak, whereby they claim that no boots will be put on the ground, yet simultaneously send boots onto the ground. The trick, however, is in calling these boots “advisers.” This has been a common tactic for decades, as even before the escalation of the Vietnam War, President Kennedy, and Eisenhower before him, had sent “advisers” to Vietnam, which slowly, and inevitably became a massive occupying force. The British plan, which has already begun in effect, “included contacting officials in ministries in Libya by mobile phone to try to persuade them not to abandon their posts.” The British “stabilisation response team” has been sent to Libya by the Foreign Office, Department for International Development and the Ministry of Defence. The Development Secretary stated, “It has been clear that we needed to learn the lessons of Iraq and plan for stabilisation and that that needed to take place in an organised and timely way.” Yet, in the same breath – and in the usual double-speak – he claimed, “It was equally clear that the process had to be Libyan led and owned.” The EU also offered to send “experts” to Tripoli “at any minute.” Libyan government officials have been and continue to be contacted “to let them let them know that they could stay in place under the new regime,” which Western officials proclaim is a lesson they learned from Iraq, where they had simply purged the former Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein and dismantled the army, adding to the chaos and crisis of post-Saddam Iraq. Commenting on this, the Development Secretary stated, “if you can get hold of the chief of police and tell him, ‘You’ve got a job, don’t take to the hills, and you will get paid,’ we can avoid that.” Another aspect of the plan includes unfreezing Libya’s assets around the world to give them to the new provisional government of the TNC.[97]</p> <p>The plans for the latest assault were organized far in advance. As <em>Debkafile</em>, an Israeli publication, revealed, they were established back in July between the US and France, as they were organizing plans for managing the Israel-Palestine issue:</p> <blockquote><p>According to the US-French plan, [an agreement] will take place shortly after the Libyan war is brought to a close – ideally by a four-way accord between the US, France, Muammar Qaddafi and the Libyan rebels or, failing agreement, <em>by a crushing NATO military blow in which the United States will also take part</em>. The proposed accord would be based on Muammar Qaddafi’s departure and the establishment of a power-sharing transitional administration in Tripoli between the incumbent government and rebel leaders.[98]</p></blockquote> <p>As recently as April, the EU said that they had a ‘ready’ force of 1,000 soldiers poised to be sent in to Libya in case they were needed. The <em>Guardian</em> reported that the EU “has drawn up a ‘concept of operations’ for the deployment of military forces in Libya, but needs UN approval for what would be the riskiest and most controversial mission undertaken by Brussels.” Purportedly, the combat troops would not be engaged in a combat role but would be authorised to fight if they or their humanitarian wards were threatened.” As one EU official stated, “It would be to secure sea and land corridors inside the country.” Another EU official declared, “The operation is agreed. It’s ready to go when we get the nod from the UN.”[99]</p> <p><strong>How to Get NATO Support: Die and Lie</strong></p> <p>However, if the EU, NATO, or the UN were to deploy troops into Libya, it would need to be under the guise of providing “peacekeeping” or other “aid” support. Thus, it would only be possible to do so in the event that Libya collapses into chaos, whether there be mass killings, genocide, or civil war. In such a situation, one is reminded of the events surrounding the ‘Srebrenica massacre’ in Bosnia in 1995.</p> <p>The official account was that roughly 8,000 Bosnian Muslims were killed by Serb aggressors, thus justifying a NATO intervention. The reality, however, was that the Bosnian Muslims had been struggling for years to “persuade the NATO powers to intervene more forcibly on their behalf,” writes Edward Herman. In fact: “Bosnian Muslim officials have claimed that their leader, Alija Izetbegovic, told them that [Bill] Clinton had advised him that U.S. intervention would only occur if the Serbs killed at least 5000 at Srebrenica.”[100] As a result of Clinton’s statement, the town was sacrificed by the Bosnian Muslims, and the propagated claim was that the Serbs had gone in and killed 8,000 Bosnian Muslims, thus justifying the NATO intervention in Bosnia. However, not only did the Bosnians sacrifice the town, but the numbers themselves were subject to much manipulation, and the facts of the circumstances surrounding the event were ignored by the media. The Croatians, along with Madeleine Albright and Bill Clinton, were delighted at the reporting of the ‘massacre,’ as for the Croats, explained Herman:</p> <blockquote><p>this deflected attention from their prior devastating ethnic cleansing of Serbs and Bosnian Muslims in Western Bosnia (almost entirely ignored by the Western media), and it provided a cover for their already planned removal of several hundred thousand Serbs from the Krajina area in Croatia. This massive ethnic cleansing operation was carried out with U.S. approval and logistical support within a month of the Srebrenica events, and it may well have involved the killing of more Serbian civilians than Bosnian Muslim civilians killed in the Srebrenica area in July: most of the Bosnian Muslim victims were fighters, not civilians, as the Bosnian Serbs bused the Srebrenica women and children to safety.[101]</p></blockquote> <p>In short, NATO (and Bill Clinton in particular) told the Bosnian Muslims that at least 5,000 Muslims needed to die at the hands of the Serbs in order to justify an intervention and the continuing war against Serbs all across the former Yugoslavia. The fact that a number of 8,000 Muslims having been killed was (and remains) widely propagated, though widely inflated and unsubstantiated (save for the investigations into the manipulation of those numbers), was a ‘convenient’ event for NATO and the Bosnians. Also significant is the fact that such an event took place in the midst of massive ethnic cleansing of Serbs, largely ignored by the Western media, as it was committed by those who NATO were claiming to “save” from “Serbian aggression”; in particular, the Bosnian Muslims and Croatians. Some years later, Madeleine Albright, upon being told of another massacre which was good for U.S. interests, stated that, “spring has come early this year.”[102] Of course, this is also the same woman who said that 500,000 dead Iraqi children (killed by the UN sanctions Albright helped impose and enforce during the Clinton administration) was “worth it.”[103] So, it is safe to say that we can dispense with any claims of “humanitarian” concerns on the part of NATO leaders. Their interests are imperial. Their propaganda is humanitarian.</p> <p>The same must be kept in mind about Libya, where we were told we went to “intervene” in order to “protect civilians.” Yet, immediately we began supporting what turned out to be a ruthless military outfit, including al-Qaeda-linked Islamists, who have concocted lies to justify their cause and foreign intervention, and who have been committing ethnic cleansing of black migrants and citizens in Libya. We call these people “pro-democracy” and claim that they represent a “popular uprising.”</p> <p>The British government stated on 22 August that, “hundreds of British soldiers could be sent to Libya to serve as peacekeepers if the country descends into chaos,” with two hundred troops on standby since the start of July, as well as 600 Royal Marines who “are also deployed in the Mediterranean and would be available to support humanitarian operations.”[104]</p> <p>The possibility of an invasion seems imminent, as even if the rebels take Tripoli and overthrow Gaddafi, since thereafter the real struggle would begin, and the rebel TNC would likely struggle to maintain unity and possibly engage in attempts to purge various factions from the leadership, as the assassination of the former army commander in late July indicated is already taking place. Uniting these factions remains one of the greatest challenges the rebels will face.[105]</p> <p>Military sources revealed to some alternative media the plans for the U.S. to occupy Libya with upwards of 30,000 soldiers by October.[106] A <em>Debkafile</em> report from July indicates that Western leaders were actively planning for a military invasion and occupation of Libya, starting with the French and British and followed by American troops.[107] In early July, the Russian envoy to NATO stated that, “I think that now we are witnessing the preparation stage of a ground operation which NATO, or at least some of its members… are ready to begin.”[108]</p> <p><strong>The Barons of ‘Humanitarian Imperialism’</strong></p> <p>As the rebels entered the capital, the true nature and purpose of the war and “intervention” in Libya was made known, as Western oil companies made their intentions and interests public, and the rebel TNC established themselves as subservient to those very interests.</p> <p>Gaddafi may have signed his own death warrant back in 2009, when his government gathered 15 executives from global oil and energy corporations and demanded that they foot the bill – to the tune of $1.5 billion – for Libya’s settlement with victims of the downed Pan Am Flight 103 (itself a very mysterious terrorist attack possibly tracing back to the CIA itself[109]). Libya had been subjected to UN sanctions from 1992-2003 as punishment for the terrorist attack, though it has never been conclusively proven that Libya had any involvement. Gaddafi, for his part, was seeking to make those who profited off of his country’s wealth (foreign oil conglomerates) pay for the costs of their punishment, as the sanctions had largely affected the nation’s economy. Libyan officials warned the oil companies that if they did not comply, there would be “serious consequences” for their oil leases. In 2004, when trade restrictions were lifted with Libya, Gaddafi gave in to Western interests in the aftermath of the Iraq war, fearing that Libya would be next. As the trade barriers broke down, the U.S. Department of Commerce “began to serve as self-described matchmakers for American businesses,” as companies like Halliburton, Boeing, Raytheon, ConocoPhillips, Occidental, and Caterpillar tried to “gain footholds” in the country. However, there were several problems and corporate plundering was increasingly stalled. The Gaddafis often demanded the corporations plunder the nation in joint partnerships with state-owned (and Gaddafi family run) companies, which the foreign conglomerates resisted, in which the State Department tried to intervene (according to diplomatic cables), but often failed to come to an agreement. However, some companies such as Occidental Petroleum, Petro-Canada, and Canadian arms manufacturer, SNC-Lavalin made inroads into Libya.[110]</p> <p>In January of 2009, Gaddafi threatened that Libyan oil “maybe should be owned by national companies or the public sector at this point, in order to control the oil prices, the oil production or maybe to stop it.” <em>Forbes</em> magazine asked: “Is Libya about to take the lead of its friends in Venezuela and Russia and launch a new round of energy-sector nationalism?” Postulating on the answer, <em>Forbes</em> wrote: “The thought sends a shiver through the collective spines of ConocoPhillips, Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum, Amerada Hess, and Royal Dutch Shell. All have made massive new investments in Libya.” Libyan papers had all been discussing the possibility of nationalization.[111]</p> <p>Libya, as Africa’s largest oil producer, even far surpassing the proven reserves of Nigeria, would be an enormous loss to Western interests. In March of 2009, Libya was trying to convince three American oil companies operating in the country “to sign revised contracts giving the North African nation a greater share of its oil production.” Libya had already revised its contracts with Petro-Canada, ENI of Italy, and Repsol of Spain, as well as Occidental Petroleum in the U.S. It was seeking to revise its contracts with ConcocoPhillips, Amerada Hess, and Marathon Oil, all U.S. companies.[112]</p> <p>In March of 2010, Middle Eastern press reported that, “Libya is an economic force to be reckoned with,” as it challenged both Europe and America, and gave “a warning to US oil firms that their contracts are in danger.” Oil companies were finding it increasingly difficult to do business in Libya. As one oil industry expert reported, many companies are seeking an exit, “That’s partly because Libyan authorities have, over the past year, taken a very hard line on contract negotiations and renegotiations. A lot of companies developing oilfields are finding it incredibly difficult to make money.” Libya also expelled Swiss companies and even detained two Swiss businessmen after police in Geneva arrested one of Gaddafi’s sons. U.S. State Department spokesman Philip Crowley publicly derided Gaddafi, “which in turn provoked a warning from Libya that failure to apologise could hurt US oil companies.” Crowley, in a not-so-subtle display of who the State Department really works for, apologized. As one commentator from an American think tank explained, Libya’s use of oil as political leverage represents a new turn in the country’s leadership: “After decades in isolation, Libya’s oil reserves and a sovereign wealth fund worth around US$60 billion (Dh220bn) have given it unprecedented leverage with western governments.” Italy received roughly a quarter of its energy supplies from Libya, and many other Europeans hoped that Libya’s natural gas fields would free them from dependence upon Russia. One industry analyst explained, “Libya mostly gets its way because people are prepared to pay the price,” and that, “the future of new discoveries really boils down to a small number of companies – such as BP, Shell, ExxonMobil – which have massive exploration programmes going on for the next few years, and which could open new frontiers.” However, “for time being, oil companies are leaving rather than entering.”[113] There was even a diplomatic row in November of 2010 when Libya expelled an American diplomat from the country “for breaching diplomatic rules.”[114]</p> <p>In October of 2010, U.S. oil companies Chevron and Occidental Petroleum did not extend their 5-year licenses with Libya, and instead left the country. The companies, among the first to rush to Libya following the lifting of international sanctions and formation of bilateral relations with the U.S. in 2004, established 5-year contracts with Libya in 2005. Libya, while home to Africa’s largest proven oil reserves, remained largely ‘under-explored’, and thus, unexploited.[115]</p> <p>Gaddafi’s Libya had many shady dealings with foreign (primarily British, but also French, Italian, and American) companies and individuals. Prime Minister Tony Blair had especially facilitated the emergence of prominent British industrial and financial interests into Libya, setting up meetings with top executives and Libyan officials, both while in office and after leaving. Blair and a former top MI6 official who joined BP, helped the oil conglomerate establish itself in Libya. Business and social relationships were also established between top British elites and Gaddafi’s family. Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Islam, had a cozy relationship with British Business Secretary Lord Mandelson, and in 2009, both men were guests of Lord Jacob Rothschild’s at his villa in Corfu. Until 2009, Lord Rothschild was an adviser to the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA). Tony Blair, who after leaving office, took up a job at JP Morgan, continued to go to Libya as a representative of the bank, and Gaddafi’s son referred to Tony Blair as “a personal family friend.”[116]</p> <p>JP Morgan Chase reportedly, as of late January 2011, “handles much of the Libyan Investment Authority’s [LIA’s] cash, and some of the Libyan central bank’s reserves.” According to one Libyan financier, by the summer of 2008, “a great percentage of the L.I.A.’s funds were in the interbank money markets, channelled through the central bank. They have given mandates to some of the international banks to manage this liquidity,” such as JP Morgan Chase.[117]</p> <p>Within ten days of Britain’s sanctions on Libya having been lifted in 2004, a secret delegation of British officials had rushed to Libya to open the way for British business interests. Among the officials were Lord Foster of Thames Bank; Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank, the former Army Chief of Staff; and the financier Lord Rothschild, who brought his son Nathaniel, “and the party was accompanied by four executives from a public relations firm run by Lord Bell.” As reported by the <em>Times</em>, “At stake was access to oil and gas reserves and the opportunity to profit from the country’s $90 billion sovereign wealth fund, the Libyan Investment Authority.” Lord Rothschild became an adviser to the Libyan Investment Authority, until 2009.[118]</p> <p>As Tony Blair and his secret delegation went to Libya in 2004, their meeting with Gaddafi “led to lucrative Libyan oil contracts for Shell,” and “a month before stepping down as PM, Mr Blair visited-Colonel Gaddafi in Tripoli again at the same time that BP signed a $900million deal with the Libyan National Oil Company.” On behalf of JP Morgan, Blair helped develop banking opportunities in Libya.[119] As the fighting broke out in February of 2011, Gaddafi’s “friends” in the West immediately turned their backs on him. A statement from Tony Blair’s office stated: “Tony Blair does not and has never had any sort of commercial relationship or any sort of advisory role with any member of the Gaddafi family, the government of Libya, the Libyan Investment Authority nor any Libyan companies.”[120]</p> <p>In early March, Britain (and several other nations, including the United States and Canada) froze Libya’s foreign assets in their countries, which had been managed by the Libyan Investment Authority. Over $3.2 billion in assets were frozen in London, and over $32 billion were frozen in the U.S.[121] As the fighting began, the major Western oil conglomerates closed down their operations and fled.[122]</p> <p>Clearly, Gaddafi, after establishing significant ties with foreign elites, from JP Morgan, to Rothschild, to Prince Andrew of the British Royals and Tony Blair, made ‘friends’ of himself and his family to the dominant foreign financial and oil interests. When he began using Libya’s newfound oil wealth as a political tool, his “new friends” quickly became “old enemies.” These Western elites had helped Gaddafi gain access to Western markets and invest in their companies, while those companies tried to plunder the resources of Libya, as soon as Gaddafi felt secure enough, he began to use his new oil and financial leverage as a political tool. As this began, the West – and in particular the banking and oil elites – found Gaddafi to be much more of a liability than an asset. Now that Gaddafi is “gone,” the jubilation of Western conglomerates can barely be contained.</p> <p>This is evident in the fact that as the rebels have gone into Libya, foreign oil conglomerates quickly followed behind. On 24 August 2011, the <em>Independent</em> reported that, “British businesses are scrambling to return to Libya in anticipation of the end to the country’s civil war,” yet, “they are concerned that European and North American rivals are already stealing a march as a new race to turn a profit out of the war-torn nation begins.” Thus, it is a new ‘scramble for Africa’ as the Western nations and corporations rush to plunder the country’s resources and wealth. British business leaders said that, “plans are in hand to send a trade mission to Benghazi to meet leaders of the Transitional National Council (TNC).” Among the stampeding oil conglomerates, there “is also intense lobbying for the multibillion-pound reconstruction contracts that are likely to be offered once fighting ends.”[123]</p> <p>Even as the rebels had not taken Tripoli, reported the <em>Globe and Mail</em>, “already the leaders of France and Italy, and their national oil champions, were openly courting the top men of the rebels’ National Transitional Council (NTC).” As for who will get to reap the rewards of Libya’s newly “liberated” oil, “the NTC has already said it will reward the countries that bombed Col. Gadhafi’s forces.” One rebel official stated, “We don’t have a problem with Western countries like Italians, French and U.K. companies,” however, he added, “we may have some political issues with Russia, China and Brazil.” These were, of course, the countries that did not back the strong sanctions on Gaddafi’s regime.[124]</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p> <p>This is what we call “humanitarian intervention.” A situation in which we go to war against a foreign nation, based upon lies; in which we support – arm, organize, and lead – a militant rebel army; an army which has been committing atrocities, ethnic cleansing, and spreading lies and misinformation; in which we call these rebels ‘pro-democracy’ protesters; in which we call a group with less than 15% of the support of the people a “popular uprising”; in which we bomb innocent civilians to allow these rebels to move forward and occupy new territory; in which our oil companies move in to plunder the wealth of the most oil-rich country in Africa. This – <em>this!</em> – is what we call “humanitarian intervention.”</p> <p>Our leaders do not care for human life. They care about power and profits. They will tell you anything you want to hear in order to justify their imperial conquests around the world. They will send you – most especially the poor ‘you’ – off to foreign countries in order to kill poor, foreign people. They will do this in order to obtain control over resources and strategic routes. One of America’s most pre-eminent imperial strategists, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in his 1997 book, <em>The Grand Chessboard</em>, that America must maintain hegemony over the entire world, but – he wrote – “the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of well-being.”[125] In the same book, Brzezinski, in blunt language explained the purpose and role for America to play in the world:</p> <blockquote><p>To put it in a terminology that hearkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together.[126]</p></blockquote> <p>Brzezinski, incidentally, supported the military intervention in Libya, which he claimed is “something between war and military intervention, to stop something that is going on, but without really trying to conquer the country,” and that, “if we didn’t act it would be worse.”[127]</p> <p>Who are we really helping? Who are we really hurting? And why?</p> <p>We must not support this cynical and disastrous conquest of “humanitarian imperialism,” whether it is in Libya, or perhaps – quite soon – in Syria. Wherever we “intervene,” we make everything much worse for that vast majority of the people involved. Where our nations go, they spread chaos, war, death, destruction and genocide. When our nations speak, they speak of hypocritical morality and paradoxical ethics. They speak with twisted tongues and poison words.</p> <p>We must speak truth back. We must “intervene” in the discourse of the powerful around the world, in order to promote the true interests of humanity: freedom, peace, and solidarity. Only when we seek – and speak – truth, can we ever hope to meet the true ‘humanitarian’ needs of the world’s people.</p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Andrew Gavin Marshall</strong> is an independent researcher and writer based in Montreal, Canada, writing on a number of social, political, economic, and historical issues. He is co-editor of the book, “The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century.” His website is <strong>http://www.andrewgavinmarshall.com</strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Notes</strong></p> <p>[1] Chris McGreal, Gaddafi’s army will kill half a million, warn Libyan rebels, The Guardian, 12 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/12/gaddafi-army-kill-half-million">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/12/gaddafi-army-kill-half-million</a></p> <p>[2] Daily Mail Reporter, Libya declares immediate ceasefire… but Gaddafi forces keep on bombing, The Daily Mail, 18 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367063/Libya-crisis-World-strikes-Gaddafi-UN-votes-protect-Libyan-rebels.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367063/Libya-crisis-World-strikes-Gaddafi-UN-votes-protect-Libyan-rebels.html</a></p> <p>[3] Mark Townsend, Benghazi attack by Gaddafi’s forces was ‘ploy to negate air strikes’, The Guardian, 19 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/19/benghazi-gaddafi-military-air-strikes">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/19/benghazi-gaddafi-military-air-strikes</a></p> <p>[4] Libya jets bomb rebels, Reuters, 14 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/libya-jets-bomb-rebels-2241707.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/libya-jets-bomb-rebels-2241707.html</a></p> <p>[5] KAREEM FAHIM and DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK, Qaddafi Massing Forces in Tripoli as Rebellion Spreads, The New York Times, 23 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/world/africa/24libya.html?hp">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/world/africa/24libya.html?hp</a></p> <p>[6] Msnbc.com staff and news service reports, Libya protesters to try to capture Gadhafi, MSNBC, 24 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41731365/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/libya-protesters-try-capture-gadhafi/#.TlSc0jtEPpt">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41731365/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/libya-protesters-try-capture-gadhafi/#.TlSc0jtEPpt</a></p> <p>[7] Laura Rozen, Who are the Libyan rebels? U.S. tries to figure out, The Envoy, 22 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/libyan-rebels-u-tries-figure-20110322-150042-513.html">http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/envoy/libyan-rebels-u-tries-figure-20110322-150042-513.html</a></p> <p>[8] Ahmed Jadallah, Gaddafi defiant as protesters killed, The Independent, 25 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gaddafi-defiant-as-protesters-killed-2225667.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gaddafi-defiant-as-protesters-killed-2225667.html</a></p> <p>[9] Daily Mail Reporter, Fuelled ‘by Viagra’, Gaddafi’s troops use rape as a weapon of war with children as young as EIGHT among the victims, The Daily Mail, 25 April 2011: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1380364/Libya-Gaddafis-troops-rape-children-young-eight.html#ixzz1VvWtkIFK">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1380364/Libya-Gaddafis-troops-rape-children-young-eight.html#ixzz1VvWtkIFK</a></p> <p>[10] Flavia Krause-Jackson and Caroline Alexander, Rape as Weapon of War Is UN Focus, Bloomberg, 6 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-06/rape-as-weapon-of-war-is-un-focus-after-libyan-woman-s-plight.html">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-06/rape-as-weapon-of-war-is-un-focus-after-libyan-woman-s-plight.html</a></p> <p>[11] NBC News, US intel: No evidence of Viagra as weapon in Libya, MSNBC, 29 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42824884/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/#.TlSRVztEPps">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42824884/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/#.TlSRVztEPps</a></p> <p>[12] Patrick Cockburn, Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war, The Independent, 24 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html</a></p> <p>[13] Ibid.</p> <p>[14] Richard Pendlebury, Outside the rebels were jubilant. Inside the court I came face to face with Gaddafi’s savage mercenaries, The Daily Mail, 25 February 2011: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1360457/Libya-Inside-Benghazi-court-Gaddafis-mercenaries.html#ixzz1VvdyPumz">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1360457/Libya-Inside-Benghazi-court-Gaddafis-mercenaries.html#ixzz1VvdyPumz</a></p> <p>[15] Patrick Cockburn, Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war, The Independent, 24 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html</a></p> <p>[16] DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and KAREEM FAHIM, Libyan Rebels March Toward Qaddafi Stronghold, The New York Times, 27 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/world/africa/28libya.html?pagewanted=all">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/world/africa/28libya.html?pagewanted=all</a></p> <p>[17] KAREEM FAHIM, With Confidence and Skittishness, Libyan Rebels Renew Charge, The New York Times, 20 march 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/world/africa/21benghazi.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/world/africa/21benghazi.html</a></p> <p>[18] Richard N. Haas, What Next in Libya?, Huffington Post, 6 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.cfr.org/libya/next-libya/p24611">http://www.cfr.org/libya/next-libya/p24611</a></p> <p>[19] RT, “Airstrikes in Libya did not take place” – Russian military, Russia Today, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://rt.com/news/airstrikes-libya-russian-military/">http://rt.com/news/airstrikes-libya-russian-military/</a></p> <p>[20] Patrick Cockburn, Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war, The Independent, 24 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html</a></p> <p>[21] News Transcript, DOD News Briefing with Secretary Gates and Adm. Mullen from the Pentagon, U.S. Department of Defense, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4777">http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4777</a></p> <p>[22] Glenn Greenwald, Bad stenographers, Salon, 28 November 2007:</p> <p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2007/11/28/stenography">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2007/11/28/stenography</a></p> <p>[23] Ibid.</p> <p>[24] From the Editors, The Times and Iraq, The New York Times, 26 May 2004:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/international/middleeast/26FTE_NOTE.html?ex=1400990400&en=94c17fcffad92ca9&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND">http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/international/middleeast/26FTE_NOTE.html?ex=1400990400&en=94c17fcffad92ca9&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND</a></p> <p>[25] Howard Kurtz, The Post on WMDs: An Inside Story, The Washington Post, 12 August 2004:</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer</a></p> <p>[26] Howard Kurtz, The Post on WMDs: An Inside Story, The Washington Post, 12 August 2004:</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer</a></p> <p>[27] Neil MacDonald, Rebels vow to open up Libya to investment, Financial Times, 15 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b97dd138-976d-11e0-af13-00144feab49a,s01=1.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b97dd138-976d-11e0-af13-00144feab49a,s01=1.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3</a></p> <p>[28] Patrick Cockburn, Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war, The Independent, 24 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html</a></p> <p>[29] Mahmood Mamdani, Libya: Politics of humanitarian intervention, Al-Jazeera, 31 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/201133111277476962.html">http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/201133111277476962.html</a></p> <p>[30] Uri Friedman, Meet the Libyan Rebels the West Is Supporting, The Atlantic Wire, 24 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/03/meet-the-libyan-rebels-west-is-supporting/36048/">http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/03/meet-the-libyan-rebels-west-is-supporting/36048/</a></p> <p>[31] CHARLES LEVINSON, Rebel Leadership Casts a Wide Net, The Wall Street Journal, 10 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704629104576190720901643258.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704629104576190720901643258.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</a></p> <p>[32] Daniel Schwartz, Mahmoud Jibril: the international face of Libya’s rebels, CBC News, 29 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/29/f-libya-jibril.html">http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/29/f-libya-jibril.html</a></p> <p>[33] The interim national council, A vision of a democratic Libya, The Guardian, 29 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/29/vision-democratic-libya-interim-national-council">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/29/vision-democratic-libya-interim-national-council</a></p> <p>[34] NBC, CIA feelers in Libya; rebels lose lots of ground, MSNBC, 30 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42334849/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/cia-feelers-libya-rebels-lose-lots-ground/#.TlSQ9TtEPps">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42334849/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/cia-feelers-libya-rebels-lose-lots-ground/#.TlSQ9TtEPps</a></p> <p>[35] MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT, C.I.A. Agents in Libya Aid Airstrikes and Meet Rebels, The New York Times, 30 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html?_r=1&hp">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html?_r=1&hp</a></p> <p>[36] Ken Dilanian, CIA officers working with Libya rebels, The Los Angeles Times, 31 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/31/world/la-fg-cia-libya-20110331">http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/31/world/la-fg-cia-libya-20110331</a></p> <p>[37] Ibid.</p> <p>[38] Robert Fisk, America’s secret plan to arm Libya’s rebels, The Independent, 7 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/americas-secret-plan-to-arm-libyas-rebels-2234227.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/americas-secret-plan-to-arm-libyas-rebels-2234227.html</a></p> <p>[39] CHARLES LEVINSON And MATTHEW ROSENBERG, Egypt Said to Arm Libya Rebels, The Wall Street Journal, 17 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704360404576206992835270906.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704360404576206992835270906.html</a></p> <p>[40] Chris Adams, Libyan rebel leader spent much of past 20 years in suburban Virginia, McClatchy Newspapers, 26 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/03/26/111109/new-rebel-leader-spent-much-of.html">http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/03/26/111109/new-rebel-leader-spent-much-of.html</a></p> <p>[41] Russ Baker, Is General Khalifa Hifter The CIA’s Man In Libya?, Business Insider, 22 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cias-man-in-libya-2011-4">http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cias-man-in-libya-2011-4</a></p> <p>Amy Goodman, A Debate on U.S. Military Intervention in Libya: Juan Cole v. Vijay Prashad, Democracy Now!, 29 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/29/a_debate_on_us_military_intervention">http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/29/a_debate_on_us_military_intervention</a></p> <p>Patrick Martin, American media silent on CIA ties to Libya rebel commander, World Socialist Web Site, 30 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://wsws.org/articles/2011/mar2011/hift-m30.shtml">http://wsws.org/articles/2011/mar2011/hift-m30.shtml</a></p> <p>[42] Chris McGreal, Libyan rebel efforts frustrated by internal disputes over leadership, The Guardian, 3 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/libya-rebel-leadership-split">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/libya-rebel-leadership-split</a></p> <p>[43] Ian Black, Libya rebels rejects Gaddafi’s al-Qaida spin, The Guardian, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/01/gaddafi-libya-al-qaida-lifg-protesters">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/01/gaddafi-libya-al-qaida-lifg-protesters</a></p> <p>[44] Gadhafi blames bin Laden, drugs for Libya unrest, MSNBC, 24 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41753687/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/gadhafi-blames-bin-laden-drugs-libya-unrest/#.TlVymztEPps">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41753687/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/gadhafi-blames-bin-laden-drugs-libya-unrest/#.TlVymztEPps</a></p> <p>[45] Richard Adams, Charlie Sheen v Muammar Gaddafi: whose line is it anyway?, The Guardian, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/quiz/2011/mar/01/muammar-gaddafi-charlie-sheen-quiz">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/quiz/2011/mar/01/muammar-gaddafi-charlie-sheen-quiz</a></p> <p>[46] Michael Solomon, Quiz: Charlie Sheen or Muammar Qaddafi?, Vanity Fair, 25 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/02/quiz-charlie-sheen-or-muammar-qaddafi">http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/02/quiz-charlie-sheen-or-muammar-qaddafi</a></p> <p>[47] Matt Gurney, Matt Gurney: Muammar Gaddafi and Charlie Sheen, spot the difference, The National Post, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/03/01/matt-gurney-muammar-gaddafi-and-charlie-sheen-spot-the-difference/">http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/03/01/matt-gurney-muammar-gaddafi-and-charlie-sheen-spot-the-difference/</a></p> <p>[48] Robin Cook, The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means, The Guardian, 8 July 2005:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/08/july7.development">http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/08/july7.development</a></p> <p>[49] CHARLES LEVINSON, Ex-Mujahedeen Help Lead Libyan Rebels, The Wall Street Journal, 2 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576237042432212406.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576237042432212406.html</a></p> <p>[50] Praveen Swami, Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links, The Telegraph, 25 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html</a></p> <p>[51] Robert Winnett, Libya: al-Qaeda among Libya rebels, Nato chief fears, The Telegraph, 29 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8414583/Libya-al-Qaeda-among-Libya-rebels-Nato-chief-fears.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8414583/Libya-al-Qaeda-among-Libya-rebels-Nato-chief-fears.html</a></p> <p>[52] Terry Glavin, Ottawa’s Gaddafi fans find their world crumbling, The National Post, 23 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/08/23/terry-glavin-ottawas-gaddafi-fans-find-their-world-crumbling/#more-48400">http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/08/23/terry-glavin-ottawas-gaddafi-fans-find-their-world-crumbling/#more-48400</a></p> <p>[53] Scott Taylor, Support for Gaddafi soars amid NATO bombing on civilians, Halifax Chronicle-Herald, 21 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110821/Timestwo/int013.html">http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110821/Timestwo/int013.html</a></p> <p>[54] Up to 15,000 killed in Libya war: U.N. rights expert, Reuters, 9 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/09/us-libya-un-deaths-idUSTRE7584UY20110609">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/09/us-libya-un-deaths-idUSTRE7584UY20110609</a></p> <p>[55] Media Advisory, Libyan Deaths, Media Silence, FAIR, 18 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4379">http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4379</a></p> <p>[56] Libya civilian deaths ‘sap NATO credibility’, Al-Jazeera, 20 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/video/africa/2011/06/2011620144740151623.html">http://english.aljazeera.net/video/africa/2011/06/2011620144740151623.html</a></p> <p>[57] Patrick Cockburn, Amnesty questions claim that Gaddafi ordered rape as weapon of war, The Independent, 24 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html</a></p> <p>[58] MICHELE NORRIS, In Libya, African Migrants Say They Face Hostility, NPR, 25 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/02/25/134065767/-African-Migrants-Say-They-Face-Hostility-From-Libyans">http://www.npr.org/2011/02/25/134065767/-African-Migrants-Say-They-Face-Hostility-From-Libyans</a></p> <p>[59] African migrants targeted in Libya, Al-Jazeera, 28 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/201122865814378541.html">http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/201122865814378541.html</a></p> <p>[60] Peter Mietzner, Rebels target suspected mercenaries in Libya, iNamibia, 5 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.inamibia.co.na/news-and-weather/15-africa/810-rebels-target-suspected-mercenaries-in-libya-.html">http://www.inamibia.co.na/news-and-weather/15-africa/810-rebels-target-suspected-mercenaries-in-libya-.html</a></p> <p>[61] Simba Russeau, Uprising Revives Entrenched Racism Towards Black Africans, IPS, 21 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/201103211518.html">http://allafrica.com/stories/201103211518.html</a></p> <p>[62] News Desk Report, Massacre of Blacks in Libya, The Ghanaian Journal, 9 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.theghanaianjournal.com/2011/03/09/massacre-of-blacks-in-libya/">http://www.theghanaianjournal.com/2011/03/09/massacre-of-blacks-in-libya/</a></p> <p>[63] IBT, Black Africans and other non-Libyans targeted for revenge killings: reports, International Business Times, 1 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/117665/20110301/libya-africans.htm">http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/117665/20110301/libya-africans.htm</a></p> <p>[64] Jason Koutsoukis, Black men mistaken for mercenaries, The Sydney-Morning Herald, 6 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/black-men-mistaken-for-mercenaries-20110305-1biwb.html">http://www.smh.com.au/world/black-men-mistaken-for-mercenaries-20110305-1biwb.html</a></p> <p>[65] David Zucchino, Libyan rebels accused of targeting blacks, The Los Angeles Times, 4 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/04/world/la-fg-libya-mercenaries-20110305">http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/04/world/la-fg-libya-mercenaries-20110305</a></p> <p>[66] Onwuchekwa Jemie, Black Africans slaughtered in Libya, Business Day, 22 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessdayonline.com/NG/index.php/analysis/columnists/19302-black-africans-slaughtered-in-libya-">http://www.businessdayonline.com/NG/index.php/analysis/columnists/19302-black-africans-slaughtered-in-libya-</a></p> <p>[67] LIBYA: Rebels execute black immigrants while forces kidnap others, Somaliland Press, 4 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://somalilandpress.com/libya-rebels-execute-black-immigrants-while-forces-kidnap-others-20586">http://somalilandpress.com/libya-rebels-execute-black-immigrants-while-forces-kidnap-others-20586</a></p> <p>[68] Sam Dagher, Libya City Torn by Tribal Feud, The Wall Street Journal, 21 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304887904576395143328336026.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304887904576395143328336026.html</a></p> <p>[69] Michel Martin, Black Migrants Caught In Libya Unrest, NPR, 16 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/03/16/134596590/Black-Migrants-Caught-In-Libya-Unrest">http://www.npr.org/2011/03/16/134596590/Black-Migrants-Caught-In-Libya-Unrest</a></p> <p>[70] Rosebell Kagumire, Guest article: A mercenary and an immigrant; a story of black Africans and Libya, The Independent, 3 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.ug/component/wordpress/2011/03/guest-articlea-mercenary-and-an-immigrant-a-story-of-black-africans-and-libya/?Itemid=331">http://www.independent.co.ug/component/wordpress/2011/03/guest-articlea-mercenary-and-an-immigrant-a-story-of-black-africans-and-libya/?Itemid=331</a></p> <p>[71] Italy Warns of a New Wave of Immigrants to Europe, Der Spiegel, 24 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,747459,00.html">http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,747459,00.html</a></p> <p>[72] Stanley Pignal and Giulia Segreti, Italians fear African migration surge, The Financial Times, 21 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/46b9e68c-3dea-11e0-99ac-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/46b9e68c-3dea-11e0-99ac-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3</a></p> <p>[73] Libya: up to a million refugees could pour into Europe, The Telegraph, 21 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8339225/Libya-up-to-a-million-refugees-could-pour-into-Europe.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8339225/Libya-up-to-a-million-refugees-could-pour-into-Europe.html</a></p> <p>[74] Ibid.</p> <p>[75] Canada joins propaganda war aimed at Gadhafi forces, CBC News, 26 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/SciTech/20110729/canada-joins-propaganda-war-aimed-at-gadhafi-forces-110729/">http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/SciTech/20110729/canada-joins-propaganda-war-aimed-at-gadhafi-forces-110729/</a></p> <p>William Maclean, Analysis: Seeking leverage, Libya foes in propaganda war, Reuters, 5 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/05/us-libya-propaganda-idUSTRE7744K620110805">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/05/us-libya-propaganda-idUSTRE7744K620110805</a></p> <p>[76] Kevin Bogardus, PR firm helps Libyan rebels to campaign for support from US, The Hill, 12 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/155379-pr-firm-helps-libyan-rebels-to-campaign-for-us-support">http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/155379-pr-firm-helps-libyan-rebels-to-campaign-for-us-support</a></p> <p>[77] Rachel Leven, Libyan rebels hire Washington’s No. 1 lobby firm for ‘advice and assistance’, The Hill, 2 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/169509-libyan-rebels-hire-washingtons-no-1-lobby-firm?page=2#comments">http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/169509-libyan-rebels-hire-washingtons-no-1-lobby-firm?page=2#comments</a></p> <p>[78] CNN wire staff, U.S. recognizes Libyan rebels’ authority, CNN, 15 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2011-07-15/world/libya.us.recognition_1_libyan-rebels-transitional-national-council-misrata?_s=PM:WORLD">http://articles.cnn.com/2011-07-15/world/libya.us.recognition_1_libyan-rebels-transitional-national-council-misrata?_s=PM:WORLD</a></p> <p>[79] Molly Hennessy-Fiske, LIBYA: Push to unfreeze Libyan assets, LA Times Blog, 25 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2011/08/united-nations-security-council-diplomats-said-thursday-that-south-africa-will-likely-drop-its-opposition-to-unfreezing-15.html">http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2011/08/united-nations-security-council-diplomats-said-thursday-that-south-africa-will-likely-drop-its-opposition-to-unfreezing-15.html</a></p> <p>[80] AP, Libyan rebel forces leader shot dead, The Guardian, 28 July 2011:
<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/28/libya-rebel-forces-leader-killed">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/28/libya-rebel-forces-leader-killed</a></p> <p>[81] Adrian Blomfield, Libyan rebels in disarray after mysterious killing of leading military commander, The Telegraph, 29 July 2011:
<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8670137/Libyan-rebels-in-disarray-after-mysterious-killing-of-leading-military-commander.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8670137/Libyan-rebels-in-disarray-after-mysterious-killing-of-leading-military-commander.html</a></p> <p>[82] Russ Baker, Is General Khalifa Hifter The CIA’s Man In Libya?, Business Insider, 22 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cias-man-in-libya-2011-4">http://www.businessinsider.com/the-cias-man-in-libya-2011-4</a></p> <p>Amy Goodman, A Debate on U.S. Military Intervention in Libya: Juan Cole v. Vijay Prashad, Democracy Now!, 29 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/29/a_debate_on_us_military_intervention">http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/29/a_debate_on_us_military_intervention</a></p> <p>Patrick Martin, American media silent on CIA ties to Libya rebel commander, World Socialist Web Site, 30 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://wsws.org/articles/2011/mar2011/hift-m30.shtml">http://wsws.org/articles/2011/mar2011/hift-m30.shtml</a></p> <p>Chris McGreal, Libyan rebel efforts frustrated by internal disputes over leadership, The Guardian, 3 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/libya-rebel-leadership-split">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/libya-rebel-leadership-split</a></p> <p>[83] Scott Taylor, Support for Gaddafi soars amid NATO bombing on civilians, Halifax Chronicle-Herald, 21 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110821/Timestwo/int013.html">http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110821/Timestwo/int013.html</a></p> <p>[84] Richard Norton-Taylor and Dominic Rushe, Assault on Tripoli ‘planned weeks ago’, The Guardian, 25 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/25/libya-rebel-backers-free-funds">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/25/libya-rebel-backers-free-funds</a></p> <p>[85] KAREEM FAHIM and MARK MAZZETTI, Rebels’ Assault on Tripoli Began With Careful Work Inside, The New York Times, 22 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/world/africa/23reconstruct.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/world/africa/23reconstruct.html</a></p> <p>[86] Karen DeYoung and Greg Miller, Allies guided rebel ‘pincer’ assault on Tripoli, The Washington Post, 22 August 2011:
<br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/allies-guided-rebel-pincer-assault-on-tripoli/2011/08/22/gIQAeAMaWJ_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/allies-guided-rebel-pincer-assault-on-tripoli/2011/08/22/gIQAeAMaWJ_story.html</a></p> <p>[87] Gordon Rayner, Libya: secret role played by Britain creating path to the fall of Tripoli, The Telegraph, 22 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8716758/Libya-secret-role-played-by-Britain-creating-path-to-the-fall-of-Tripoli.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8716758/Libya-secret-role-played-by-Britain-creating-path-to-the-fall-of-Tripoli.html</a></p> <p>[88] Daya Gamage, Gaddafi under siege: Two CIA-backed groups, an al-Qaeda-linked LIFG on top of power stakes, The Asia Tribune, 22 August 2011:
<br /><a href="http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/08/22/gaddafi-under-siege-two-cia-backed-groups-al-qaeda-linked-lifg-top-power-stakes">http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/08/22/gaddafi-under-siege-two-cia-backed-groups-al-qaeda-linked-lifg-top-power-stakes</a></p> <p>[89] Jason Ukman, The lesson of Libya: Limited intervention can work, The Washington Post, 22 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/the-lesson-of-libya-limited-engagement-can-work/2011/08/22/gIQAl8WQWJ_blog.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/the-lesson-of-libya-limited-engagement-can-work/2011/08/22/gIQAl8WQWJ_blog.html</a></p> <p>[90] Howard Kurtz, The Post on WMDs: An Inside Story, The Washington Post, 12 August 2004:</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58127-2004Aug11?language=printer</a></p> <p>[91] Kim Sengupta, Terror in Tripoli as loyalists fight to the death, The Independent, 25 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/terror-in-tripoli-as-loyalists-fight-to-the-death-2343458.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/terror-in-tripoli-as-loyalists-fight-to-the-death-2343458.html</a></p> <p>[92] Ibid.</p> <p>[93] Portia Walker, ‘We are afraid of both Gaddafi and the rebels’, The Independent, 25 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/we-are-afraid-of-both-gaddafi-and-the-rebels-2343462.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/we-are-afraid-of-both-gaddafi-and-the-rebels-2343462.html</a></p> <p>[94] Robert Fisk, History repeats itself, with mistakes of Iraq rehearsed afresh, The Independent, 25 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-history-repeats-itself-with-mistakes-of-iraq-rehearsed-afresh-2343459.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-history-repeats-itself-with-mistakes-of-iraq-rehearsed-afresh-2343459.html</a></p> <p>[95] Ibid.</p> <p>[96] Richard Norton-Taylor, Nato will not put troops on ground in Libya, The Guardian, 24 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/24/nato-will-not-put-troops-ground-libya">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/24/nato-will-not-put-troops-ground-libya</a></p> <p>[97] Duncan Gardham, Libya: Britain prepares to send team to help with stability plan, The Telegraph, 23 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8718947/Libya-Britain-prepares-to-send-team-to-help-with-stability-plan.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8718947/Libya-Britain-prepares-to-send-team-to-help-with-stability-plan.html</a></p> <p>[98] DEBKAfile Exclusive Report, Palestinians to apply to Security Council next week for UN membership, DEBKAfile, 7 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/palestinians-to-apply-to-security-council-next-week-for-un-membership/">http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/palestinians-to-apply-to-security-council-next-week-for-un-membership/</a></p> <p>[99] Ian Traynor, Libya conflict: EU awaits UN approval for deployment of ground troops, The Guardian, 18 April 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/libya-conflict-eu-deployment-ground-troops">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/libya-conflict-eu-deployment-ground-troops</a></p> <p>[100] Edward S. Herman, “THE APPROVED NARRATIVE OF THE SREBRENICA</p> <p>MASSACRE,” <em>International Journal for the Semiotics of Law</em> (Vol. 19, No. 4, 2006), pages 411-412.</p> <p>[101] Ibid, page 412.</p> <p>[102] Ibid, page 411.</p> <p>[103] Rahul Mahajan, ‘We Think the Price Is Worth It’, FAIR, November/December 2001:</p> <p><a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1084">http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1084</a></p> <p>[104] Jason Groves, Ian Drury and Nick Fagge, British troops may act as peacekeepers if Libya descends into chaos, The Daily Mail, 23 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029013/Libya-war-British-troops-act-peacekeepers-Gaddafis-downfall.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029013/Libya-war-British-troops-act-peacekeepers-Gaddafis-downfall.html</a></p> <p>[105] Martin Chulov, Libya rebels have won the war but biggest battle will be uniting factions, The Guardian, 22 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/22/libya-rebels-ntc-future">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/22/libya-rebels-ntc-future</a></p> <p>[106] Aaron Dykes, U.S. Invasion of Libya Set for October, Infowars.com, 15 June 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/u-s-invasion-of-libya-set-for-october/">http://www.infowars.com/u-s-invasion-of-libya-set-for-october/</a></p> <p>[107] US and NATO prepare final assault on Qaddafi. He threatens terror, DEBKAfile, 3 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.melchizedekpriest.com/?p=5149">http://www.melchizedekpriest.com/?p=5149</a></p> <p>[108] NATO may be preparing ground operation in Libya – Russian envoy, RIA Novosti, 1 July 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://en.rian.ru/world/20110701/164951748.html">http://en.rian.ru/world/20110701/164951748.html</a></p> <p>[109] Marcello Mega, Police chief: Lockerbie evidence was faked, The Scotsman, 28 August 2006:</p> <p><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14908">http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14908</a></p> <p>Steve James, Lockerbie-Pan Am 103: Prosecution case evaporates, World Socialist Web Site, 17 October 2000:</p> <p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/oct2000/lock-o17.shtml">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/oct2000/lock-o17.shtml</a></p> <p>Susan Lindauer, Libya’s Blood For Oil: The Vampire War, The Intel Hub, 28 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://theintelhub.com/2011/03/28/libyas-blood-for-oil-the-vampire-war/">http://theintelhub.com/2011/03/28/libyas-blood-for-oil-the-vampire-war/</a></p> <p>[110] ERIC LICHTBLAU, DAVID ROHDE and JAMES RISEN, Shady Dealings Helped Qaddafi Build Fortune and Regime, The New York Times, 24 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/world/africa/24qaddafi.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/world/africa/24qaddafi.html?_r=1</a></p> <p>[111] Christopher Helman, Is Libya Going To Boot U.S. Oil Companies?, Forbes, 22 January 2009:</p> <p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/22/libya-gaddafi-oil-biz-energy-cx_ch_0122libya.html">http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/22/libya-gaddafi-oil-biz-energy-cx_ch_0122libya.html</a></p> <p>[112] AP, Libya Wants Greater Share of Its Oil Revenue, CNBC, 3 March 2009:</p> <p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29494495/Libya_Wants_Greater_Share_of_Its_Oil_Revenue">http://www.cnbc.com/id/29494495/Libya_Wants_Greater_Share_of_Its_Oil_Revenue</a></p> <p>[113] John Thorne, Libya flexes its new oil wealth muscles, The National, 14 March 2010:</p> <p><a href="http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwide/africa/libya-flexes-its-new-oil-wealth-muscles">http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwide/africa/libya-flexes-its-new-oil-wealth-muscles</a></p> <p>[114] Libya orders U.S. diplomat to leave: reports, Reuters, 7 November 2010:</p> <p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/07/us-libya-usa-diplomat-idUSTRE6A61T720101107">http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/07/us-libya-usa-diplomat-idUSTRE6A61T720101107</a></p> <p>[115] Ali Shuaib, Libya says Chevron and Oxy exit licenses, Reuters, 2 October 2010:</p> <p><a href="http://af.reuters.com/article/investingNews/idAFJOE69100F20101002">http://af.reuters.com/article/investingNews/idAFJOE69100F20101002</a></p> <p>[116] David Rose, The Lockerbie Deal, Vanity Fair, 26 January 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/01/libya-201101#gotopage1">http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/01/libya-201101#gotopage1</a></p> <p>[117] Ibid.</p> <p>[118] David Robertson, Richard Kerbaj and David Brown, Secret delegation went batting for British interests in Tripoli, The Times, 29 August 2009:</p> <p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6814420.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6814420.ece</a></p> <p>[119] Nabila Ramdani, Tim Shipman and Peter Allen, Tony Blair our very special adviser by dictator Gaddafi’s son, The Daily Mail, 5 June 2010:</p> <p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284132/Tony-Blair-special-adviser-dictator-Gaddafis-son.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284132/Tony-Blair-special-adviser-dictator-Gaddafis-son.html</a></p> <p>[120] Michael Peel, Friends in high places turn their back on Tripoli, The Financial Times, 23 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b0df218a-3f7f-11e0-a1ba-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b0df218a-3f7f-11e0-a1ba-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3</a></p> <p>[121] Roula Khalaf, James Blitz and Lina Saigol, UK freezes Libyan wealth fund assets, The Financial Times, 3 March 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5882452c-45d7-11e0-acd8-00144feab49a.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5882452c-45d7-11e0-acd8-00144feab49a.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3</a></p> <p>[122] Javier Blas, Oil groups prepare to close down in Libya, The Financial Times, 21 February 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/702f5730-3dd7-11e0-ae2a-00144feabdc0,s01=1.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/702f5730-3dd7-11e0-ae2a-00144feabdc0,s01=1.html#axzz1Vyjfx6z3</a></p> <p>[123] Jerome Taylor, Kevin Rawlinson, Laurie Martin and Charlotte Allen, Dash for profit in post-war Libya carve-up, The Independent, 24 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/dash-for-profit-in-postwar-libya-carveup-2342798.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/dash-for-profit-in-postwar-libya-carveup-2342798.html</a></p> <p>[124] Eric Reguly, They bombed and therefore they shall reap, The Globe and Mail, 24 August 2011:</p> <p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/commentary/eric-reguly/they-bombed-and-therefore-they-shall-reap/article2140453/">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/commentary/eric-reguly/they-bombed-and-therefore-they-shall-reap/article2140453/</a></p> <p>[125] Zbigniew Brzezinski, <em>The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives</em> (Basic Books: New York, 1997), page 36.</p> <p>[126] Ibid, page 40.</p> <p>[127] Hiram Reisner, Brzezinski: Libya Action Isn’t War, But Necessary Intervention, NewsMax, 24 March 2011:
<br /><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Brzezinski-Libya-intervention-MorningJoe/2011/03/24/id/390587">http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Brzezinski-Libya-intervention-MorningJoe/2011/03/24/id/390587</a></p><p>
<br /><em><strong></strong></em></p>AndrewGavinMarshallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03656202835584050881noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-62311883041054748062011-08-29T09:05:00.001-07:002011-08-29T09:05:59.627-07:00Why My 9-Year-Old Neice Is Smarter Than Our Genius President<p>While the evidence <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904140604576495932704234052.html">suggests</a> that President Obama is not terribly bright and has just benefited from succeeding a <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/H._L._Mencken">downright moron</a>, and while voluminous evidence to which I am privileged suggests that my 9-year-old neice Hallie is extremely intelligent, consider just this one way in which Hallie would make a wiser president than Barack.</p> <p>Infants live in the moment, and toddlers can't plan much beyond the next day or so, but as we grow we become able to consider longer periods of time. Obama seems able to manage consideration of the next funding cycle, for example. Hallie seems to do considerably better than that:</p> <blockquote><p>"August 28, 2011</p> <p>"President Barack Obama
<br />The White House
<br />1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
<br />Washington, DC 20500</p> <p>"Dear President Obama,</p> <p>"I am writing about the Keystone XL pipeline. You shouldn’t approve this. It will be a disaster for our environment. We have caused enough damage as it is.</p> <p>"Instead of using fossil fuels, which cause global warming, we can use solar power and geothermal energy. It won’t all be easy. A lot of it will be very expensive. But it’s our choice, your choice even. It’s our only world, our only home, and we have to take care of it. There would be major changes in the environment if the pipeline is put in, and the earth as we know it might never be the same again. The USA already produces 30.3% of greenhouse gases. No one can do everything, but everyone can do something, and that’s why I’m writing this letter.</p> <p>"Think about it. If you say yes, that this pipeline can be put into place, will it affect the people on earth seven generations from now? The chances are, yes. If you say yes, it will affect the whole planet and you will be remembered forever because of that. But if you say no, millions of people will benefit because of that, and everyone will be thankful.</p> <p>"My grandparents cared enough to get arrested for standing on the sidewalk outside the White House, peacefully objecting to the Keystone XL project, and frankly, I’m quite glad they did.</p> <p>"Martin Luther King used words. Mahatma Gandhi used words. And I am using words right now. Please think long and hard about this. I know your job must be really stressful, but this is important! I’m not the only one who cares. Please write back!</p> <p>"Sincerely,
<br />Hallie, age 9"</p> </blockquote> <p>The evidence suggests that President Obama does not care in the least about people living several generations from now. Look at his work in Copenhagen to keep global warming going. Look at his military and energy policies, his education policies, his economic policies. There is nothing to suggest he cares.</p> <p>Can he be brought to?</p> <p>Can a combination of nonviolent resistance and verbal persuasion shake a President out of a mindset that blocks out the deepest wisdom of our culture articulated above by a nine-year-old? Can the same perhaps bring a majority of Congress Members to overrule the catastrophic course their executive is navigating?</p> <p>Can a letter from a girl squeeze through a crack and find a human heart shriveled but beating inside the war machine? Can people who deeply believe they are right to serve an oligarchy, slaughter foreigners, imprison whistleblowers, and destroy the environment for the sake of very short-term interests, be brought to share in a longer-term vision?</p> <p>Will a president ever use the ever-bullier pulpit he is given to challenge the campaign funders and the corporate media on behalf of the very viability of life on earth? Or do our elections now produce such servile "leaders" that persuading a president of anything requires persuading Wall Street and the Pentagon first?</p> <p>Will Obama even read Hallie's letter?</p> <p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact">Ask him</a>.</p>davidswansonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10504910392531997676noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-72744711977728036972011-08-29T08:05:00.000-07:002011-09-03T22:43:43.762-07:00Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics. 3 of 4<p></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em><strong>By Carl Herman, </strong></em><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history, who blogs as the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/carl-herman">Nonpartisan Examiner</a> at Examiner.com</span><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>. Carl was one of the leaders who launched the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcredit">microcredit movement</a>, and is a tireless activist for peace and justice.
<br /> </strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;">
<br /> <em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong></strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>Don't be confused by the title. Carl - like all of us at Washington's Blog - is against violent revolution, following instead the non-violent paths of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. As we have previously written:</strong></em></p><blockquote style="font-weight: bold;"><i>I am NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, I am calling for the reinstatement of our government. I am calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, I am calling for its enforcement.</i></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"><i>
<br /></i></span></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>My friend and colleague for justice, Washington’s Blog’s author, invited me to “guest blog.” I’ll provide two. First: </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/gandhi-s-on-ending-injustice-speak-the-truth-because-truth-is-god"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Gandhi’s conclusion of the essential importance of speaking Truth</i></span></a><i>. Second: a </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>4-part series</i></span></a><i> to document that current US wars are unlawful, US economic policy is massive criminal fraud, and that these “emperor has no clothes” facts are lied about by US corporate media in constant deception.</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>I appreciate Washington’s Blog’s author for the intellectual integrity and moral courage to document powerful facts; as I appreciate readers’ thoughts, words, and acts of virtue - </i><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Carl Herman</i></span></a><i> </i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;"></span></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:100%;">“Every day, I saw more evidence about the evils humankind will inflict on their fellow humans to gain or maintain power… What is more, those who choose not to empathize may enable real monsters. For without ever committing an act of outright evil ourselves, we collude with it through our own apathy… If you choose to use your status and influence to raise your voice on behalf of those who have no voice; if you choose to identify not only with the powerful, but with the powerless; if you retain the ability to imagine yourself into the lives of those who do not have your advantages, then it will not only be your proud families who celebrate your existence, but thousands and millions of people whose reality you have helped transform for the better. We do not need magic to change the world, we carry all the power we need inside ourselves already: we have the power to imagine better.” </span></blockquote><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:100%;">– J. K. Rowling, <a href="https://feed.examiner.com/fckeditor2_6_3/editor/dialog/.%20http:/harvardmagazine.com/commencement/the-fringe-benefits-failure-the-importance-imagination"><span style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; text-decoration: underline; letter-spacing: 0px; ">Harvard Commencement, June 5, 2008</span></a></span></blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;"><a href="https://feed.examiner.com/fckeditor2_6_3/editor/dialog/.%20http:/harvardmagazine.com/commencement/the-fringe-benefits-failure-the-importance-imagination"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ></span></a></span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>Revolution </i></b>is from the Latin, <i>revolutio</i>, a “turn around” of political power.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The US public would revolt and end unlawful US wars and banksters’ rigged-casino fraud if they understood and embraced the central facts of these issues. This four-part series of articles provides the central facts, invites passionate public response, and proposes specific revolutionary public action.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Please share the Revolution to end unlawful US wars and return trillions of our dollars to constructive work. With millions of lives at stake (perhaps billions), there is nothing more important for public participation.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 1: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-criminal-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic/criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 2: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-all-begun-with-lies-2-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all begun with lies</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Part 3: <b>Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 4: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose-corporate-media-as-propaganda-4-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">These four articles are academic in language and documentation. My citizen advocacy paper, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/government-by-dicts-my-comprehensive-resources-to-prove-us-fascism-and-rigged-casino-economics-1"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Government by dicts</i></span></a>, has additional resources.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">_____________________________________________________________________________________________</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Economics: </b>I’m going to discuss trillions of dollars in a moment. As an economics teacher, I understand numbers this large are extremely difficult to imagine. If you are among the majority with this difficulty, I recommend that you follow the expert testimony that paints the picture, and know that success in this area of public education transformation that unleashes trillions of our dollars for human creative capacity in unimaginable power is sufficient to end the current economic crisis. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This is the longest section of my call for Revolution. If you tire in reading, please consider that at trillions of dollars of annual public benefits, you literally have nothing more valuable to do than understand the following facts that document the theft of our money. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Harvard’s Linda Bilmes <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article3419840.ece"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >co-authored a paper</span></a> with Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz estimating the long-term costs of current US wars at now $3 to $5 trillion ($30-$50,000 per US household of $50,000/year income), with <a href="http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=1320"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >total debt increase</span></a> since 2001 of over $10 trillion. Remember, as demonstrated by the evidence disclosed by our own government, all the reasons Americans were told to go to war were <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m9d9-Are-US-wars-in-Iraq-and-Afghanistan-mistakes-of-good-intentions-What-we-now-know-from-the-evidence"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >known to be lies as they were told</span></a> and applicable law proves these wars <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m12d7-US-war-laws-explained-why-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-wars-are-unlawful-how-to-end-them"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Orwellian unlawful</span></a>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Just down the Charles River from Harvard, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/05/the-quiet-coup/7364/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >MIT’s Simon Johnson (and former Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund) describes</span></a> our economy being lead by gambling oligarchs who have captured government as in banana republics (his words), and might plunge the US into an economy worse than the Great Depression. From his article under the telling title, <b><i>The Quiet Coup</i></b><i>:</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“Elite business interests—financiers, in the case of the U.S.—played a central role in creating the crisis, making ever-larger gambles, with the implicit backing of the government, until the inevitable collapse. More alarming, they are now using their influence to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed, and fast, to pull the economy out of its nosedive. The government seems helpless, or unwilling, to act against them.”</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">He concludes <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simon-johnson/goldman-sachs-too-big-to_b_542460.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >fraud is the heart of Wall Street.</span></a> Under the poignant title, <b><i>Goldman Sachs: Too Big to Obey the Law</i></b>: “The behavior and de facto immunity of the biggest banks is out of control.” He cites <a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/shooting-banks"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >the financial crisis was engineered by the largest banks to consolidate power:</span></a> in 1995 the leading six banks had assets of 17% of US GDP; <b>today they have 63%</b>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">His immediate best-selling book, <b><i>13 Bankers: The Wall Street takeover and the next financial meltdown</i></b>, was discussed with President Johnson’s Press Secretary and journalist with over 30 Emmy Awards, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04162010/watch.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Bill Moyers</span></a>, to explain the oligarchy, the loss of trillions of American taxpayer dollars to oligarchs’ manipulation as a matter of definitive fact, the oligarch’s looting of America is protected by their purchased political muscle, and without transformation “the next financial meltdown” is certain: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>BILL MOYERS: </b>Let me get to the blunt conclusion you reach in your book. You say that two years after the devastating financial crisis of '08 our country is still at the mercy of an oligarchy that is bigger, more profitable, and more resistant to regulation than ever. Correct?</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>SIMON JOHNSON: </b>Absolutely correct, Bill. The big banks became stronger as a result of the bailout. That may seem extraordinary, but it's really true. They're turning that increased economic clout into more political power. And they're using that political power to go out and take the same sort of risks that got us into disaster in September 2008.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>BILL MOYERS: </b>And your definition of oligarchy is?</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>SIMON JOHNSON: </b>Oligarchy is just- it's a very simple, straightforward idea from Aristotle. It's political power based on economic power. And it's the rise of the banks in economic terms, which we document at length, that it'd turn into political power. And they then feed that back into more deregulation, more opportunities to go out and take reckless risks and-- and capture huge amounts of money….The American democracy was not given to us on a platter. It is not ours for all time, irrespective of our efforts. Either people organize and they find political leadership to take this on, or we are going to be in big trouble, okay?... That's absolutely the heart of the problem. I would also say and tell you, and emphasize, these people will not come out and debate with us. The heads of these companies or their representatives, they will not come out. They're afraid. They don't have the substance. They don't have the arguments. We have the evidence. They have the lobbyists. And that's all they have.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>BILL MOYERS: </b>They've got the power, the muscle, the money.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>SIMON JOHNSON: </b>They have money.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>BILL MOYERS: </b>You just have the arguments. You just have the facts. On your side.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" ><b>SIMON JOHNSON: </b>Absolutely. That's exactly what it comes down to. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Most people don’t read professional economists’ writing. I do, and can tell you that leaders such as Simon Johnson are using unprecedented strong language to provide the facts. Again, in his choice of words: <i>the US economy is under attack by a colluding and unlawful oligarchy</i>. Without Revolution that forces political leadership to transform the US economy to serve the public rather than the oligarchy, as Johnson says above: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“The American democracy was not given to us on a platter. It is not ours for all time, irrespective of our efforts. Either people organize and they find political leadership to take this on, or we are going to be in big trouble, okay?”</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d9-Bailout-overseer-Elizabeth-Warren-banks-recklessly-gamble-knowing-US-taxpayers-will-pay-losses">Harvard’s Elizabeth Warren explains</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> the economy in language just as fierce. She professionally observes that the US economy is run by “reckless gamblers” who exploit a system they know in advance will “privatizes gains and socializes losses.” She documents the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/27/elizabeth-warren-the-chip_n_438379.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >increasing destruction of the US middle class</span></a> as US financial “leaders” write their own laws “behind closed doors,” and choose regulators who will protect them and not the public in order to <a href="http://www.truthout.org/elizabeth-warren-protecting-middle-class-from-financial-predators56477"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >“fleece consumers.”</span></a> As you may know, Ms. Warren is the Leo Gottlieb Professor at Harvard Law School and Chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the so-called “bailout” program. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Ms. Warren admonishes: the US economy is in the “last chapter” with “all the chips on the table.” She says either the US public will demand their political and economic leaders end the fleecing because they “took the cops off the beat,” or the US middle class will devolve to live from paycheck to paycheck as Wall Street’s debt peons, “and <b>the game really will be over</b>.” </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The good news is that solutions to the crisis are simple. But let’s first continue with crucial facts and testimony. Take a deep breath. This is the civic economics education leaders like you must be responsible for or else you’re damned for condoning US War Criminals and ongoing plunder of trillions of our families’ and children’s money. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Chris Hedges, Middle East Bureau Chief for the New York Times, best-selling author, and Pulitzer Prize recipient in 2002, writes that American taxpayers are on the road to permanent serfdom under a police state from oligarchs’ “rapacious looting” and their purchase of a politically-protected luxurious lifestyle. He calls our economic system “criminal” and “totalitarian capitalism” lording over the exploited slave-labor class the American public has become (<a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090406_resist_or_become_serfs/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Resist or Become Serfs</i></span></a> and video, “<a href="http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/chris_hedges_on_poverty_and_the_permanent_lower_class_20100421/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Chris Hedges on poverty and the permanent lower class</span></a>”). Mr. Hedges also writes and lectures that current US wars are criminal Wars of Aggression (<a href="http://www.alternet.org/news/145871/should_progressives_give_up_on_obama_chris_hedges_vs._rabbi_lerner/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >here</span></a>, among dozens of his works). From <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24369.htm"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Wall Street will be back for more</i></span></a>: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“These corporations don't make anything. They don't produce anything. They gamble and bet and speculate. And when they lose vast sums they raid the U.S. Treasury so they can go back and do it again. Never mind that $50 trillion in global wealth was erased between September 2007 and March 2009, including $7 trillion in the U.S. stock market and $6 trillion in the housing market. Never mind that the total amount of retirement and household wealth trashed was $7.5 trillion or that we saw $2 trillion in 401(k)s and individual retirement accounts evaporate. Never mind the $1.9 trillion in traditional defined-benefit plans and the $2.6 trillion in nonpension assets that went up in smoke. Never mind the job losses, the foreclosures and the 35 percent jump in personal and small-business bankruptcies. There are bundles of new money, taken again from us, to make deals and hand out outrageous bonuses. And when these trillions run out they will come back for more until our currency becomes junk.”</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Mr. Hedges poignant assessment matches the acknowledged government data. According to the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d18-US-Senate-Banksters-the-new-Enron-manipulating-markets-to-add-trillions-to-consumer-prices"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report</span></a>, these financial oligarchs’ “trading” in non-wealth producing market derivatives increases the price of gasoline for all Americans somewhere from 33 to 60%. Market analysis in other commodities’ “trading” brings the total cost to American consumers of padded prices over $1 trillion every year. <b>This is an incredible increase of prices to US households of ~$10,000 for every $50,000 of annual income!</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >“It's one of the most frustrating things. We essentially have had modern-day bank robbers -- except that they wore gray suits and not masks -- and there's been no accountability for it ... </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >Every day we see energy speculators, war profiteers, managed health-care providers, media propagandists, and/or financiers given some unfair advantage over the average consumers and taxpayers, and the cumulative effect of the American people watching selfishness prevail over the public interest has been an undermining of the public's trust in government. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >There's no question the system is rigged against the little guy. The bigger interests have a lot more information. They jerry-rig the system so that they always win.” </span></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;color:#666666;" >– <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/11/senator-dorgan-we-essentially-have-had.html%20"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">Senator Byron Dorgan</span></a></span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/11/senator-dorgan-we-essentially-have-had.html%20"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px font-size:130%;color:#0928a7;" ></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This admission is crucial data. However, considering Elizabeth Warren and Simon Johnson’s expert testimony of a captured government who collude rather than end this parasitic cost to Americans, the Senate report should force government compliance under existing law to stop cartels, not merely report on how many trillions they’re costing the American public under the Senate’s “oversight.”</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Nobel Prize-winning economist, former Chief Economist at the World Bank, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, and Columbia economics professor, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/opinion/01stiglitz.html?pagewanted=2"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Joseph Stiglitz</span></a>, agrees the US economy continues under oligarchic domination: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“What the Obama administration is doing is…ersatz capitalism, the privatizing of gains and the socializing of losses. It is a “partnership” in which one partner robs the other. And such partnerships — with the private sector in control — have perverse incentives, worse even than the ones that got us into the mess.”</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The economic fraud isn’t just protected by government non-regulation; the government is one of the principle embezzlers. The <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d23-US-war-embezzlement-visualized-4minute-video-banned-from-Congress-testimony-Iraq-for-Sale"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Pentagon admitted they “lost” $2.3 trillion dollars</span></a> (over $20,000 per US household) and then didn’t follow-up with investigation. The American public heard about this news only once that anyone has been able to document from corporate media. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The solvable problems center around economic policy that creates protected parasites that collect unregulated and illegal gambling profits on the way up (the <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/publications/financial/fcs_report052005/fcs_report052005.htm"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >FBI reported</span></a> 80% of the subprime mortgage fraud came from lenders), subsidized losses through “bailouts” on the way down, and then celebrate with <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m1d1-Goldman-Sachs-Record-of-23-billion-in-bonuses-for-2009-explaining-their-economic-parasitism"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >unprecedented bonuses</span></a> to themselves while publicly <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d10-Goldman-Sachs-CEO-doing-Gods-work-Enron-CEO-We-are-on-the-side-of-angels"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >claiming to be doing “God’s work.”</span></a> Future bailouts get <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m1d1-HR-4173-Congress-promises-banksters-4-trillion-without-hearings-next-time-they-cry-Bailout"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >guaranteed in advance without questions</span></a> by government, while the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/nearly-one-year-later-oba_n_416884.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >symbolic program</span></a> to help struggling homeowners is hyped in corporate media but not implemented. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The most egregious documentation of government fraud is in the data of collective government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) that reveal trillions of our dollars invested while lying in omission that they have no money for budgets. This takes some time to understand; the data is <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d22-CAFR-US-agencies-have-billions-trillions-in-investments-while-crying-budget-deficits"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >explained and documented here</span></a>. For an example to understand what this means, the University of California system (UC) had a budget deficit that resulted in thousands of students denied enrollment, thousands of staff laid-off, a 32% tuition raise, and a 10% employee pay-cut with furloughs to reduce education days. The deficit could have been fully-funded with <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d24-CAFR-UC-budget-fully-funded-with-onefifth-of-one-percent-of-state-of-CA-investments"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >less than one-fifth of one percent</span></a> of California's documented investments. And no, the amount required for retiree benefits is only one-half of one percent of the total; that's the specious and usual "official" lie. The above link will walk you through those trillions, if this is of interest. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The cartels taking billions of our dollars are in many industries. Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief of the <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i> and currently a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Medical School <a href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/050602pharmaceuticalindustrycoverup"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >documents</span></a>: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion).”</span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Importantly, “profit” is distinct from “research” in understanding these figures. This is <i>prima facie </i>evidence of unlawful collusion among a cartel, yet government doesn’t investigate. <a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/questions-for-dr-marcia-angell/%20"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Dr. Angell concludes</span></a> that US government will never provide universal health care because both political parties’ “leadership” obeys health insurance companies’ lobbyists rather than legislate for the public good. The lack of health care kills about 45,000 Americans every year according to the <a href="http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/medicine-health/articles/new-study-finds-45000-deaths-annually-linked-lack-health-coverage"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >recent study championed by Harvard’s Medical School</span></a>. Cost-benefit analyses range between <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d13-Economic-fascism-corporatedirected-health-care-instead-of-physiciandirected-public-option-at-cost"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >$100 to $300 billion annual cost increase</span></a> to the US by keeping health care companies between doctors and patients. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Is academic economics the proper place to work for solutions rather than a Revolution? Let’s look. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In light of the evidence so far of oligarchic control in the US economy, it’s troubling that <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d30-Mainstream-media-censors-economic-solutions-Federal-Reserve-controls-economic-journals"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >professional economics journals’editorial boards have half the members receiving money from the Federal Reserve</span></a>. The Federal Reserve is the pinnacle bank of the current banking system; with a <a href="http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty5.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >majority of shares owned</span></a> by the same banks that Simon Johnson reports have consolidated their assets to 63% of US GDP. This circumstantial evidence suggests that professional consideration of ideas contrary to existing monetary policy may be censored. We’ll examine omission of competing ideas you’ll conclude should be under political and public consideration shortly. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/the-geithner-summers-plan_b_183499.html">Jeffrey Sachs</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">, best-selling author and one of the world’s best-known economists, agrees that competing ideas are missing in government and corporate media of our most important economic areas. He sharply writes: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >“Cynics believe that the Geithner-Summers Plan is exactly what it seems: a naked grab of taxpayer money for Wall Street interests. Geithner and Summers argue that it's the least bad approach to a messy situation, in which we need to restore banking functions but don't have any perfect ways to do that. If they are serious about their justification, let them come forward to confront their critics and to explain to the American people why the other proposals are not being pursued. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >Let them explain the hidden and not-so-hidden risks to the American taxpayer of the plan that they have put forward. Let them explain why they are so intent on saving the banks' bondholders, even the long-term unsecured creditors who clearly knew they were taking market risks in buying Citibank bonds. Let them work with their critics to fashion a less risky and less costly plan. So far Geithner and Summers tell us that their plan is the only option, but without a word of further explanation as to why.”</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" > </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Leading academic economists testify that something is indeed missing from their understanding of crucial national economic understanding. Several professors from <a href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/12/economics-has-grown-too-specialized-too.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Harvard’s Economics Department admitted</span></a> to the Boston Globe that they both didn’t see the economic collapse coming and don’t have solutions. They acknowledged limitations in their current theories and thinking: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >"Everyone that I know in economics, and particularly in the worlds of academic finance and academic macroeconomics, is going back to the drawing board," said David Laibson, a Harvard economist. "There are very, very, very few economists who can be proud." </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >"You can't just say, 'I have a model for tremors that works great - I just can't explain earthquakes,"' said Kenneth Rogoff, an economist at Harvard who has studied financial crises. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >"We have a very restrictive set of language and tools, and we tend to work on the problems that are easily addressed with those tools," said Jeremy Stein, a financial economist at Harvard. "Sometimes that means we focus on silly questions and ignore greater ones."</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" > </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Let’s examine some evidence of how Revolution for these trillion dollar issues can breakthrough what Harvard’s Professor Stein calls “silly questions” to demand professional cost-benefit analyses of alternative models of economic management clearly discussed by <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/top-ten-list-of-americans-for-monetary-reform-the-most-important-economic-policy-us-history"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >many of America’s brightest historical minds</span></a>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The Great Depression in the US (1929-1941) motivated professional economists to comprehensively and creatively address its causes. Upon consideration of previous US economic depressions in 1837, 1873, and 1893, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/top-10-americans-for-monetary-reform-10-86-of-economics-professors-during-great-depression"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >prominent economists led by Henry Simons at the University of Chicago proposed monetary reform </span></a>as the nation’s most effective and practical policy response, known as the <a href="http://www.monetary.org/chicagoplan.html%20"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Chicago Plan </span></a>(and <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JI17Dj03.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >here</span></a>). This proposal was endorsed by Simons’ colleague, Paul Douglas, Frank Graham and Charles Whittlesley of Princeton, Irving Fisher of Yale, Earl Hamilton of Duke, Willford King of NYU, and sent to a thousand academic economists for their input. Three hundred twenty responded to the mailed proposal and survey (an impressively high number for a cold-call proposal and survey) from 157 universities, with 73% in full agreement with the proposal, 12.5% in approval with various considerations in its implementation, and only 14% in disagreement. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Nobel laureate <a href="http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/milton-friedman-end-the-fed/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Milton Friedman</span></a> would become the proposal’s best-known champion. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This proposal was the shift from banking industry creation of “money as debt” through loans (technically “credit” and not money because it exists only and always as increasing and unpayable debt in the macro economy), to the government creating debt-free money for the direct payment of public goods and services. This policy has several extraordinary benefits (details in the links): </span></p> <ol style="list-style-type: decimal"> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m9d12-Paying-the-national-debt-with-monetary-reform"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">national debt is paid</span></a> rather than always increased.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">It’s the only policy that <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d28-Ellen-Brown-US-economic-reform-creates-fullemployment-renewed-infrastructure-zero-national-debt"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">accomplishes the goal of full employment</span></a> as the government becomes the employer of last resort.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This policy ends the economic crisis almost instantly; and once the program is established will guarantee no further unemployment crises.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">If the GDP value of government employment exceeds its costs (consider infrastructure that returns far more than costs), the US would have the double benefit of decreasing prices as well as full employment.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">For an example of interest, considering the <a href="http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18848"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">US Department of Education reports</span></a> that between 100,000 to 300,000 US public education positions are in danger of termination for the 2010-2011 school year, this policy creates money directly to rehire unemployed teachers and fill all school needs. Our current economic model will suffer the layoffs and decrease in education quality.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">State-of-the-art infrastructure.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Elimination of almost all social costs of poverty.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">If banking were nationalized rather than being “bailed out” in the present, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m10d29-Florida-political-leaders-consider-stateowned-bank-2-mortgages-6-credit-cards-no-state-debt-co"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">interest rates could be non-profit</span></a> (think 1 or 2% mortgages that would reduce the cost of homeownership by 50%).</span></li> </ol> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Despite 86% of academic economists in favor of this proposal, its 1934 policy proposal in Congress was defeated. Paul Douglas, leading economist and Senator from Illinois from 1949 to 1967 wrote: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" >“This proposal will of course be opposed by the bankers from whom it takes the lucrative privilege of creating purchasing power. It would however insure the safety of deposits, give large revenues to the government, provide complete social control over monetary matters and prevent abnormal fluctuations in the capital market. At the same time it would permit the allocation of productive resources…to remain primarily in private hands. All in all it seems the most promising program for the reform of our monetary and credit system…”</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">So: why isn’t this proposal considered by Harvard’s economists, Congress, and known to you today? </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Consider the possible answer of oligarchic control of American “leadership” for generations as we consider the next piece of revealing evidence: Thomas Edison and Henry Ford understood the mechanics of money, and went on a media tour together to explain this transformative education. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m9d19-Top-10-Americans-for-monetary-reform-Thomas-Edison-1">Thomas Edison’s 1921 media tour</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> with Henry Ford included traveling to the site of a hydroelectric dam to explain to the public through the media the economic breakthrough to build the dam apart from the parasitic and captured finance we still have today that Simon Johnson and Elizabeth Warren so strongly describe. Edison explained fully to the New York Times reporter how public works can and should be funded by government directly creating and paying for the project. This is less than half the cost of the continuing method of government borrowing money. Edison concluded the interview by explaining that ideas for the public good that challenged corporate oligarchs have always been defeated by the oligarch’s purchased propaganda campaigns: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >“Certainly there is a complete set of misleading slogans kept on hand for just such outbreaks of common sense among the people. The people are so ignorant of what they think are the intricacies of the money system that they are easily impressed by big words. There would be new shrieks of ‘fiat money,’ and ‘paper money’ and ‘green-backism,’ and all the rest of it – the same old cries with which the people have been shouted down from the beginning. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >But maybe we have passed beyond the time when the thoughtful 2 per cent – you know, I gather from my questionnaire that only 2 per cent of the people think,” and Mr. Edison smiled broadly. “Maybe they can’t shout down American thinkers any longer. The only dynamite that works in this country is the dynamite of a sound idea. I think we are getting a sound idea on the money question. The people have an instinct which tells them that something is wrong, and that the wrong somehow centers in money. They have an instinct, also, which tells them when a proposal is made in their interests or against them.”</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;color:#666666;" ></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In conclusion of this section of literal trillion dollar importance, there is a human face to our current economic condition calling for Revolution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">We live in a present political/economic “leadership” environment that allows a million children to die from preventable poverty every month. These million human beings die every month, year after year, despite the investment to save their lives is <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/economics-of-ending-poverty-0-7-of-gni-is-all-it-takes"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >less than 1% of our income</span></a> (the annual investment is ~$100 billion a year for about a ten-year project to end poverty forever). In addition, every nation that has ended poverty has also reduced their population growth rates to sustainable levels. This human cost is remarkably under-reported compared with the death toll of 3,000 innocent lives on the one day of 9/11 (allegedly the reason for US wars – to stop such innocent loss of future lives). </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Preventable poverty kills 30,000 every day, ten times the deaths on 9/11, for a total of over 100 million innocent human beings killed since 9/11. And please remember the 45,000 dead Americans every year and our combined annual loss of $100 billion to $300 billion because US political “leadership” chooses cartel profits over physician-managed health care. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.earth.columbia.edu/pages/endofpoverty/oda">According to Jeffrey Sachs</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">, when polled, the American public think we give 25% of our government budget to help the poorest of the poor, are willing to give 10%, and would be outraged to understand the actual figure we give is less than one-sixth of one percent of our income. American media and political leadership allow this disinformation to continue at the cost of 30,000 lives every day while <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m1d1-HR-4173-Congress-promises-banksters-4-trillion-without-hearings-next-time-they-cry-Bailout"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Congress passed HR 4173 to guarantee future so-called bailouts for banks at $4 trillion dollars</span></a> without hearings. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In review, this section has presented data and expert testimony that the US “modern” economy is still a Robber Baron-era oligarchy. Logically, only one of the following two conclusions seems to be possible: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">1. Either people like Jeffrey Sachs, Thomas Edison, 86% of academic economists in the 1930s, and others of our <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m10d6-Top-10-Americans-for-monetary-reform-history-and-insight-for-the-present"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >brightest historical American minds</span></a> beginning with Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson were too stupid to understand that corporate bankers creating a national debt supply rather than a money supply is best for Americans, and best without consideration or ethical refutation of their competing and wrong ideas. Things like the banking bailout should be done without Congressional hearings and passed immediately when banking insiders say so because they’re experts. And just because what you’re reading proved government and corporate media Orwellian war lies, those two groups wouldn’t collude with corporate bank and finance cartels to parasitize millions, billions and trillions of dollars because they respect law and honesty with money. Oh, and Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Paul Grayson and all the third parties are extremists with impractical ideas of monetary reform that don’t deserve explanation. Even though Pew Research reports <a href="http://www.alternet.org/economy/146630/the_staggering_collapse_of_living_standards_in_the_us_--_92%25_of_americans_unhappy_with_the_economy"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >92% of Americans oppose our current economic management</span></a>, we don’t need civic education on alternative models. Or…</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">2. The US “modern” economy really is an oligarchy that suppresses competing ideas and parasitically costs Americans trillions of dollars every year. Without Revolution, this parasitic cost will continue with current trends indicating the costs will increase. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" >“When our Federal Government, that has the exclusive power to create money, creates that money and then goes into the open market and borrows it and pays interest for the use of its own money, it occurs to me that that is going too far. I have never yet had anyone who could, through the use of logic and reason, justify the Federal Government borrowing the use of its own money... The Constitution of the United States does not give the banks the power to create money. The Constitution says that Congress shall have the power to create money, but now, under our system, we will sell bonds to commercial banks and obtain credit from those banks. I believe the time will come when people will demand that this be changed. I believe the time will come in this country when they will actually blame you and me and everyone else connected with this Congress for sitting idly by and permitting such an idiotic system to continue. I make that statement after years of study.” </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;color:#666666;" > - <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/top-10-americans-for-monetary-reform-6-chairs-of-the-house-banking-committee"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px ">Wright Patman</span></a>, Representative in the U.S. Congress from 1929 to his death on March 7, 1976, and Chair of the House Committee on Banking and Currency for 40 years. For 20 of those years, he introduced legislation to repeal the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913. This quote is from excerpts of September 29, 1941, as reported in the Congressional Record of the House of Representatives (pages 7582-7583).</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" > </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Revolution unleashes trillions of our dollars. Revolution exposes and ends what history will frame as the end of “Robber Baron” corporate/political cartels. Revolution enters America into a golden age unimaginable in the present. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">And fortunately, the structural solutions are obvious, simple, and have been understood and advocated by <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/top-ten-list-of-americans-for-monetary-reform-the-most-important-economic-policy-us-history"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >leading American minds</span></a> for literally centuries. Even if the economic solutions proposed beginning with Benjamin Franklin are too complex for you to invest your time to understand, the case for Revolution should be obvious by the suppression of these competing ideas that either are worthy of consideration or should have been professionally refuted (“refutation” is distinct from denial or propaganda as Thomas Edison explained). </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">If you want more economic data that piles-on additional proof of an oligarchy collusion between corporate cartels and owned regulators looting our economy, I recommend the brilliant comprehensive explanation and documentation of David DeGraw in his no-holds-barred paper, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m5d27-Time-for-law-abiding-American-citizens-to-stop-paying-taxes-start-a-new-government-1-of-13"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >"Time for law-abiding American citizens to stop paying taxes, start a new government?"</span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">And if you're ready to take the rational next step to embrace the possibility of economics that fully utilizes technology, watch <a href="http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Zeitgeist Addendum</i></span></a> and/or <a href="http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Zeitgeist: Moving Forward</i></span></a><i>. </i>This planetary breakthrough potential is explained at <a href="http://www.thevenusproject.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >The Venus Project</span></a>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 4: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose-corporate-media-as-propaganda-4-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p><p></p>Carl Hermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06658884974184959361noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-79108757701066628232011-08-28T12:43:00.000-07:002011-08-28T16:21:34.889-07:00Playing the “Get into Saudi Arabia free card”<span style="font-family:arial;">This guest blog is from Kevin Ryan, co-editor of the <em>Journal of 9/11 Studies</em>. Kevin's personal blog can be found at </span><a href="http://digwithin.net/"><span style="font-family:arial;">Dig Within</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;">.
<br />
<br />Recent developments among supporters of the US government’s version of events indicate that they plan to begin blaming Saudi Arabia for the attacks of September 11, 2001. There is, in fact, much evidence suggesting complicity by some elements within the Saudi government. But that fact only further implicates western powers due to the close relationship between the Saudi royal family, which runs the Saudi government, and deep state controlling interests that have partnered with and manipulated the Saudi royal family for many decades. Blaming Saudi Arabia would, however, make a lot of sense if seizing resources, including the world’s greatest oil reserves, was what the war on terror has always been about.
<br />
<br />Two weeks ago I spoke to NPR producer, Alex Kingsbury, who asked if I felt the release of the 28-pages of redacted material from the Joint Congressional Inquiry might help to solve the mysteries still surrounding 9/11. Those redacted pages, and much of the 9/11 Commission report that followed, have always seemed to be a kind of "Get into Saudi Arabia free" card for the powers that be. Kingsbury was interested in knowing whether the redacted pages, which are thought to contain significant references to Saudi Arabia, were of interest to me personally. Of course they would be, I said, but we should remember that the government of Saudi Arabia is far from representative of its people.
<br />
<br />Similarly, a recent interview with “Counterterrorism Czar,” Richard Clarke, has been the subject of considerable discussion. Ostensibly, Clark’e objective with this interview was to make the controversial suggestion that two of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were targets for recruitment by the CIA. What many have failed to emphasize, however, is that Clarke was simultaneously suggesting that the two alleged hijackers were actually working for the government of Saudi Arabia at the time of the attacks.
<br />
<br />About a month ago, military intelligence officer and 9/11 staffer, Miles Kara, wrote to me asking if I was aware of the publication of a book called <em>The Eleventh Day</em> by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan. Kara declared that this new book was – “<em>the definitive work, to date, on 9/11</em>.” Having since had a chance to borrow a copy of this book from the library, I can say that it is a malevolent piece of propaganda that attempts to persuade the ill-informed of three things.
<br />
<br />The first thing that the Summers and Swann book attempts to do is malign the 9/11 truth movement. For example, the authors suggest that the movement is well represented by people like video-fakery and Star Wars beam advocate, James Fetzer, and it has been well answered by government employees and simple-minded contrarians like Ryan Mackey. Summers and Swann also state that well-sourced samples of World Trade Center dust, collected using completely appropriate chain of custody forms, are not good sources of information yet long-time propagandist, Gerald Posner, and Weekly Standard contributor, Thomas Joscelyn (who recently tried to link Iran to 9/11), are excellent sources.
<br />
<br />The second goal of the book is to propose that the partial release of documents by the 9/11 Commission in the last few years has answered all the unanswered questions about the attacks. It’s not clear if the authors had a chance to look at many of those documents though. For example, one of them says that the training school for Hani Hanjour, whom the 9/11 Commission called “<em>the operations most experienced pilot</em>,” questioned Hanjour’s pilot certificate because he had “<em>no fundamental skills / poor English</em>” and they “<em>wondered if the cert was false</em>.”</span><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=53246864840716464#_edn1" name="_ednref1"><span style="font-family:arial;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"> This is but one of many examples in which these newly released documents directly contradict the 9/11 Commission report, instead of supporting it as Summers and Swann claim.
<br />
<br />Most importantly, this new book attempts to blaze a new trail for Saudi complicity in the attacks of 9/11. Unfortunately, although the book details a number of reasons why the Saudi government should be investigated for supporting the alleged perpetrators of 9/11, it paradoxically avoids many of the important Saudi links to 9/11. The authors appear to do this in an effort to accuse the Saudis while simultaneously covering-up evidence that western corporations and western government leaders were really behind many of the Saudi links.
<br />
<br />Here are a few of the surprising connections between Saudi Arabia and westerners who were in one way or another related to the 9/11 attacks.
<br />
<br />· Bernard Kerik, the New York City police commissioner and “9/11 hero,” spent three years working in Saudi Arabia in the 1970s for a company that occupied one of the WTC towers at the time of the attacks. He then spent another three years in Saudi Arabia in the 1980s as “<em>the chief investigator for the royal family</em>.” It was Kerik who first told the public that explosives were not used at the WTC, and it was his police department that was said to have discovered the magic passport which fell from one of the towers to conveniently provide evidence identifying one of the alleged hijackers.
<br />
<br />· One of two primary companies to manage the clean-up of Ground Zero, Bovis Lend Lease, had previously built the Riyadh Olympic stadium in Saudi Arabia.
<br />
<br />· The other primary clean-up company at Ground Zero, AMEC, had just completed a $258 million refurbishment of Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, which is exactly where Flight 77 impacted that building. AMEC is a major international player in the oil and gas industry, as well as in other natural resource industries. AMEC had a significant presence in Saudi Arabia dating back to the late 1970s, providing support to the national oil company Saudi Aramco.
<br />
<br />· The company that designed the security systems for the WTC complex, Kroll Associates, had strong connections to Saudi Arabia. For example, Kroll board member Raymond Mabus was the US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia in the mid 1990s.
<br />
<br />· All four of the primary contractors that were involved in rebuilding the security systems for the WTC had done significant business with the Saudis. Electronic Systems Associates' parent, S&H, designed King Saud University, and E.J. Electric worked for Saudi Arabian Airlines. Ensec was owned by a former arms dealer to the Saudis. Stratesec, which had contracts not only for the WTC but also for Dulles airport, where Flight 77 took off, and United Airlines which owned two of the three other planes, worked under "<em>a joint venture agreement with Ahmad N. AlBinali & Sons Co., a large Saudi Arabian engineering and construction company, to develop and conduct business in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.</em>"
<br />
<br />· The Bush and Bin Laden-financed Carlyle Group owned, through BDM International, the Vinnell Corporation, a mercenary operation that had extensive contracts in the Middle East since 1975 and trained the Saudi Arabian National Guard. Several of Stratesec’s key employees, including COO Barry McDaniel, came from BDM. In 1995, BDM’s Vinnell was one of the first targets of al Qaeda, in Saudi Arabia.
<br />
<br />· In the 1990s, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), run by Dick Cheney protégé, Duane Andrews, trained the Saudi Navy and brought Saudi military personnel to company headquarters in San Diego for further study. SAIC played a large part in the NIST WTC investigation after 9/11, but was also involved in the investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing, boasting that -- "<em>After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, our blast analyses produced tangible results that helped identify those responsible</em>." SAIC was paid huge sums to rebuild the NSA and FBI systems that supposedly failed before 9/11.
<br />
<br />· While SAIC was training the Saudi Navy, the Carlyle/BDM subsidiary Vinnell Corp was training the Saudi Arabian National Guard. Simultaneously, Booz Allen Hamilton was managing the Saudi Marine Corps and running the Saudi Armed Forces Staff College.
<br />
<br />· Former FBI director Louis Freeh, whose agency investigated al Qaeda-attributed terrorism from 1993 to 2001, is now the personal attorney for Saudi ambassador "Bandar Bush."
<br />
<br />· Salomon Smith Barney, the company that occupied all but 10 floors of WTC building 7, was taken over by Citigroup in 1998. Citigroup had recently been saved from bankruptcy by Prince Alwaleed of Saudi Arabia, in a deal brokered by The Carlyle Group. It is believed that the money, and more, came from the terrorist financing network, BCCI, as it was dissolving. Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney joined the advisory board at Solomon Smith Barney at that time and were on the board until they resigned to join the Bush Administration in January, 2001.
<br />
<br />· The Saudi government was sued by thousands of 9/11 victim's family members due to the suspicion that Saudi Arabia helped to finance al Qaeda. The Saudis hired the law firm of Bush Administration insider, James Baker, to defend them in that lawsuit.
<br />
<br />Summers and Swann seem to have missed these interesting connections between US government officials and corporations, and Saudi Arabia. That seems odd for a book that pretends to be the definitive work to date. Despite this inconsistency, it is doubtful that Richard Clarke, 9/11 Commission staffer Miles Kara, NPR’s Alex Kingsbury, or any other supporter of the government’s reports, will say anything about it.
<br />
<br /></span><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=53246864840716464#_ednref1" name="_edn1"><span style="font-family:arial;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"> See FOIA response “5 AWA 356” received by the 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington </span><a href="http://www.911workinggroup.org/p/foia-research.html"><span style="font-family:arial;">http://www.911workinggroup.org/p/foia-research.html</span></a><span style="font-family:arial;"> page 71 of 447 </span>
<br />Daininhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17484834217852772816noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-42957691131842743772011-08-28T11:10:00.000-07:002011-09-03T22:44:53.474-07:00Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all from known lies. 2 of 4<p></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px">
<br /><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em><strong>By Carl Herman, </strong></em><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history, who blogs as the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/carl-herman">Nonpartisan Examiner</a> at Examiner.com</span><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>. Carl was one of the leaders who launched the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcredit">microcredit movement</a>, and is a tireless activist for peace and justice.
<br /> </strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;">
<br /> <em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong></strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>Don't be confused by the title. Carl - like all of us at Washington's Blog - is against violent revolution, following instead the non-violent paths of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. As we have previously written:</strong></em></p><blockquote style="font-weight: bold;"><i>I am NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, I am calling for the reinstatement of our government. I am calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, I am calling for its enforcement.</i></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>My friend and colleague for justice, Washington’s Blog’s author, invited me to “guest blog.” I’ll provide two. First: </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/gandhi-s-on-ending-injustice-speak-the-truth-because-truth-is-god"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Gandhi’s conclusion of the essential importance of speaking Truth</i></span></a><i>. Second: a </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>4-part series</i></span></a><i> to document that current US wars are unlawful, US economic policy is massive criminal fraud, and that these “emperor has no clothes” facts are lied about by US corporate media in constant deception.</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>I appreciate Washington’s Blog’s author for the intellectual integrity and moral courage to document powerful facts; as I appreciate readers’ thoughts, words, and acts of virtue - </i><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Carl Herman</i></span></a><i> </i></span></p><div><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>
<br /></i></span></div><p></p><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; ">“Passion has helped us; but can do so no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defence.--Let those materials be moulded into general intelligence, sound morality, and in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws.” </span>- Abraham Lincoln, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/void%280%29/*252*/"><span style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Lyceum Address, 1838</span></a>.</span></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" ><i></i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>Revolution </i></b>is from the Latin, <i>revolutio</i>, a “turn around” of political power.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The US public would revolt and end unlawful US wars and banksters’ rigged-casino fraud if they understood and embraced the central facts of these issues. This four-part series of articles provides the central facts, invites passionate public response, and proposes specific revolutionary public action.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Please share the Revolution to end unlawful US wars and return trillions of our dollars to constructive work. With millions of lives at stake (perhaps billions), there is nothing more important for public participation.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 1: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-criminal-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic/criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Part 2: <b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all begun with lies</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 3: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-parasitic-and-criminal-economics-3-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 4: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose-corporate-media-as-propaganda-4-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">These four articles are academic in language and documentation. My citizen advocacy paper, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/common-sense-for-new-american-revolution-revolt-from-us-government-by-dicts"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Government by dicts</i></span></a>, has additional resources.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">_____________________________________________________________________________________________</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>US War Crimes: </b>US political leadership is engaged in “emperor has no clothes” unlawful wars that have escalated into Pakistan, Yemen, and with rhetoric to attack Iran that darkly includes <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m4d15-US-threatens-to-Nuke-Iran-blames-victims-intentions-Beware-false-flag-attack-for-US-to-pull-tri"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >use of nuclear weapons in official first-strike policy</span></a>. The US has abandoned its exercise of power under the US Constitution. Millions of Americans recognize this condition, but as yet a critical mass of Americans either do not recognize the facts or cannot articulate what they perceive into effective civic action. The educational stakes are whether the US will exist as a Constitutional Republic under the law, or as an unlawful empire. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The wars are not close to lawful, and political rhetoric is often in Orwellian opposition to the facts. One of the first academic leaders to explain the obvious is <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/boyle0917.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Francis Boyle</span></a>, Harvard-educated (Ph.D in political science and J.D.) international law professor. His outrage is expressed in the title of his article, <b><i>Is Bush’s War Illegal? Let us Count the Ways</i></b><i>:</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“The precedent again goes back to the Nuremberg Judgment of 1946 when the lawyers for the Nazi defendants argued that we, the Nazi government had a right to go to war in self-defense as we saw it, and no one could tell us any differently. Of course that preposterous argument was rejected by Nuremberg. It is very distressing to see some of the highest level of officials of our country making legal arguments that were rejected by the Nuremberg Tribunal.” </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2008/stories/20030425004002300.htm">Richard Falk</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“An objective observer would reach the conclusion that this Iraq war is a War of Aggression, and as such, that it amounts to a Crime against Peace of the sort for which surviving German leaders were indicted, prosecuted and punished at the Nuremberg trials conducted shortly after the Second World War.” </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Secretary General of the United Nations, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3661134.stm"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Kofi Annan</span></a> responding to the direct question whether the Iraq War is illegal: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter… from the charter point of view, it was illegal." </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In the January 2010 UK Chilcot Inquiry, testimony revealed that all <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m1d28-All-27-UK-Foreign-Affairs-lawyers-Iraq-war-unlawful-Obama-politicians-US-media-no-response"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >27 UK Foreign Affairs lawyers were in agreement</span></a> that the US/UK war was an unlawful War of Aggression. Their unanimous professional legal assessment before the war began was rejected without public disclosure of their work and public debate. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This expert testimony that’s taken a few minutes to read has opened a door for you. The next step is to allow me to walk you through the laws that are being violated: the crystal-clear letter and spirit of the US-created UN Charter is taught and understood in high school history and government classes, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m12d7-US-war-laws-explained-why-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-wars-are-unlawful-how-to-end-them"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >linked here</span></a> in my article, <i>US war laws explained</i><b><i>.</i></b> Reading that article results in you having the objective facts that these wars aren’t close to legal, and only continue from public ignorance and belief in government/media propaganda. By analogy, anyone observing a baseball game, even if it was their first, when briefed on the strike zone could confidently assert that a pitch thrown ten feet over the batter’s head is definitively a ball. Importantly, this person could also confidently conclude that anyone in an official capacity who called such a pitch a strike would be intentionally lying. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Just as in baseball, the laws of war are meant to be understood clearly by all who care to be educated. The irony of the title in this academic area, political “science,” that has so little regard to the objective facts, calls for a breakthrough in American civic education to force political accountability for the life-and-death facts of war and trillions of dollars of cost. I’m going to introduce more testimony to paint the picture of our US civic education condition, but before I do I must again ask you to <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m12d7-US-war-laws-explained-why-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-wars-are-unlawful-how-to-end-them"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >follow this link</span></a> so the laws of war are clear to you. <i>Only by understanding the law can you definitively see the Orwellian condition of unlawful US wars that these experts claim.</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/092607a.html">Daniel Ellsberg</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> was the top whistle-blower of unlawful US acts in the Vietnam War, including the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/obama-lies-america-has-never-fought-a-war-against-a-democracy-iran-1953-guatemala-1954-vietnam"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >government-created lies</span></a> to initiate, continue, and expand the war into neighboring countries. He writes and lectures that current US wars are also all founded upon obvious lies, unlawful, and in direct violation of the US Constitution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In addition to the illegality of US wars that the evidence so far definitively proves upon examination, we know from the disclosed evidence of our own government that all claims for current US wars were known to be lies <b><i>as they were told</i></b> to the American public and not "mistaken intelligence." <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m9d9-Are-US-wars-in-Iraq-and-Afghanistan-mistakes-of-good-intentions-What-we-now-know-from-the-evidence"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Read this</span></a> to verify. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Let’s support this perspective with history: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1963kennedy-peacestrat.html">President Kennedy</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> warned of the need of public awareness that political leaders will lie on the world stage: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“No treaty, however much it may be to the advantage of all, however tightly it may be worded, can provide absolute security against the risks of deception and evasion.” </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">President George Washington’s Farewell Address, the culmination of his 45 years of political experience, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d14-George-Washington-on-defending-the-US-Constitution-guard-against-impostures-of-pretended-patriotism"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >warned of the primary threat to America</span></a> as “the impostures of pretended patriotism” from people within our own government who would destroy Constitutional limits in order to obtain tyrannical power: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency.” </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Young Abraham Lincoln wrote eloquently to <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d12-Abraham-Lincoln-Defend-the-US-Constitution-from-unlawful-tyrants-within-our-government"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >defend the US Constitution from unlawful tyrants within our own government</span></a>. In Congress, he spoke powerfully and truthfully that the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d12-Abraham-Lincoln-stated-obvious-war-lies-to-Congress-wheres-todays-leadership"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >President’s claims for armed attack and invasion of a foreign country were lies</span></a>. Although war-mongers slurred Lincoln’s name at the time and he lost re-election, history proved his powerful and unpopular words correct in asserting the President of the US was a war-mongering liar: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:130%;">“I carefully examined the President’s messages, to ascertain what he himself had said and proved upon the point. The result of this examination was to make the impression, that taking for true, all the President states as facts, he falls far short of proving his justification; and that the President would have gone farther with his proof, if it had not been for the small matter, that the truth would not permit him… Now I propose to try to show, that the whole of this, — issue and evidence — is, from beginning to end, the sheerest deception.” </span></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Lincoln also wrote that “pre-emptive” wars, such as the US engages in now in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and threatens for Iran, were lies and “<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d12-Abraham-Lincoln-preemptive-wars-Iraq-Iran-are-lies-war-at-pleasure-impoverish-the-US"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >war at pleasure</span></a>.” Indeed, many of the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m8d17-ENDING-US-Wars-of-Aggression-advice-from-our-forefathers"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Founding Fathers’ strongest admonitions</span></a> were to guard against usurpation of power from within our own government. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">General <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d6-Most-decorated-US-Marine-General-Purpose-of-all-US-wars-is-billions-for-insiders-profits"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Smedley Butler</span></a> (and <a href="http://www.warisaracket.org/index.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >here</span></a>) was the most honored man in Marine Corps history upon his retirement after 34 years of service around the world, and privy to top secret war planning conversations. He wrote and publicly spoke that the purpose of US wars is never for democracy or national defense, but for political and economic control for millions and billions in profits for America’s leading “bankers, industrialists, and speculators.” General Butler asserted that all US wars is a “racket:” a deception whereby blood money from American taxpayers to “insiders” is always disguised as noble and necessary ventures. Americans are propagandized into paying again and again, and succeeding generations of loyal and gullible men unwittingly serve as the muscle for oligarchic profits. His recommendation to end war was to end its profit motive: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" >“Let the officers and the directors and the high-powered executives of our armament factories and our munitions makers and our shipbuilders and our airplane builders and the manufacturers of all the other things that provide profit in war time as well as the bankers and the speculators, be conscripted – to get $30 a month, the same wage as the lads in the trenches get. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" >Let the workers in these plants get the same wages – all the workers, all presidents, all executives, all directors, all managers, all bankers – yes, and all generals and all admirals and all officers and all politicians and all government office holders – everyone in the nation be restricted to a total monthly income not to exceed that paid to the soldier in the trenches!</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:130%;" > …Give capital and industry and labor thirty days to think it over and you will find, by that time, there will be no war. That will smash the war racket – that and nothing else.” </span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;font-size:100%;" ></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">It’s important to distinguish General Butler’s expert testimony concerning a subjective analysis of motive from the objective fact of current unlawful US wars proved by the crystal-clear letter of the laws. The strength of my proposal for Revolution to end unlawful wars is based upon the independently verifiable evidence that is as “emperor has no clothes” obvious as a pitch ten feet over the batter’s head is nowhere close to a strike, and as obvious as Jim Crow laws being in violation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You’ve read the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m12d7-US-war-laws-explained-why-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-wars-are-unlawful-how-to-end-them"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >laws of war</span></a> to verify this by now, yes? </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">My point in briefly reviewing testimony of Presidents Kennedy, Washington, Lincoln and General Butler is to communicate that the Revolution to end unlawful wars is not only founded in current law, but among the most important concerns throughout US history to safeguard the nation from propaganda-facilitated unconstitutional acts for oligarchic power and profit. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In irony of our history and law, there is no end in sight to current US propagandized unlawful wars. Fear-mongers’ use of “national security” rhetoric to attack and invade resource-rich and weaker nations continues. For example, in April 2010, Pentagon spokesperson <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/04/21/pentagon-repudiates-undersecretary-attack-on-iran-always-an-option/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Geoff Morrell officially stated</span></a> attacking Iran is “always an option,” in Orwellian repudiation to the UN Charter and his Oath of Office to defend the US Constitution that recognizes the UN Charter as having equal force as Constitutional law. As Professor Frankfurt properly assesses: this is bullshi*. We cannot be proud of American government without revolutionizing this condition of official lies that the US can attack, destroy, and kill with our dollars under our American flag upon the dictate (dictatorship) of the leader rather than under the rule of law. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Upon examination, the war-mongering to attack Iran is composed of Orwellian and “emperor has no clothes” obvious lies. Let’s quickly prove one of many: Presidents Bush and Obama, many US Senators and members of Congress, and corporate media say that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad threatens to destroy Israel, to “wipe them off the map.” This is repeated endlessly as a lie of commission believed by most Americans. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">However, it is an <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d20-Obama-aggress-for-war-Media-echoes-lie-Iran-threatens-to-wipe-Israel-off-the-map-Citizen-action"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Orwellian lie verifiable with 5-minutes of reading the October 2005 speech</span></a> that originated the claim. The clear content and context of the speech is the support of Palestinian resistance against the Israeli government’s violations of their civil and political rights, and the rule of law. Mr. Ahmadinejad uses an historical phrase from an Iranian exiled by Shah Pahlavi to encourage Iranians to persevere against the US-imposed Shah. The one paragraph in question in the speech continues to say that people thought the Shah’s government would never fall, but it did. People thought the USSR’s government would never fall, but it did, as did people think about Saddam’s government. The government of Israel will also fall if they continue their unjust policies toward Palestine. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>There is no physical threat to Israel in any rational reading. </i>Zip. Zero. Again, take the five minutes to confirm the American public is under attack from “official” propaganda for their civic education on a life-and-death issue that includes official policy to use nuclear weapons. The NY Times provides the translation, despite their lie of omission of definitive refutation of war rhetoric and call for impeachment of the political War Criminals. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070927213903/http:/www.iribnews.ir/Full_en.asp?news_id=200247"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >origin of the “reporting”</span></a> was propaganda from an apparent faction vying for power within Iran and similar to what preceded the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d21-US-overthrew-Irans-democracy-19531979-helped-Iraq-invade-19801988-now-US-lies-for-more-war"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >CIA-orchestrated overthrow of Iran’s democracy</span></a> from 1953 to 1979 in the now disclosed CIA Operation Ajax. If you have Persian friends, talk with them. I have a Persian friend who is a manager at NASA; incredulous and outraged the US government can tell such an enormous and obvious lie to threaten the results of Iraq on friends and family in Iran, especially with the known history of the US previous overthrow of Iran’s government under government and corporate media propaganda. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Once you confirm this specific example of an official civic lie for war, it also becomes clear that such a transparent lie is being protected by corporate media propaganda. I will address further evidence of corporate media collusion after the economics section. If you would like to understand how US “official” claims of Iran’s “nuclear program” are similar lies of commission and omission with zero evidence of any unlawful act by Iran or any evidence for nuclear material used for any purpose other than lawful energy and medical use, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d20-IAEA-report-zero-evidence-of-Iran-nukes-US-Orwellian-corporate-war-media-Iran-building-nukes"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >read this</span></a>. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You can help catalyze this transformation; just as the Civil Rights Movement and Gandhi’s work for independence for India were functions of broad-scale public education. Civil Rights, freedom, and peace all require civic revolutions to accomplish, and are our most-treasured human accomplishments. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The “emperor has no clothes” American Revolution I’m proposing is for what is already legislated with war laws; a victory of WW 2. Indeed, all members of the military and government employees have already taken an Oath to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign <b><i>and domestic</i></b>. Revolution is the obvious and responsible American civic response to unlawful US wars from Republican and Democratic “deception and evasion,” with “the impostures of pretended patriotism,” and from “beginning to end, the sheerest deception.” </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">We the People can only declare ourselves “lawful” if we honor the war laws our own nation initiated. We the People promised a world that secures future generations from the scourge of war, and have the lawful basis under treaty status of the UN Charter for Revolution from the criminal cabal within political “leadership” and corporate media. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">American adults sense many of these facts even if many of us cannot accurately articulate them; <a href="http://people-press.org/report/606/trust-in-government"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >only one in five Americans report trust and satisfaction with their government</span></a>. Americans are ready to act. This lawful call for Revolution can harness America’s passion for justice under the law, and constructively build a brighter future. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">A dangerous possible consequence of refusing lawful Revolution is destructive public anger and civic violence. And given the state of the US economy, that we will discuss next, public anger could explode if not channeled into constructive Revolution.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 3: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-parasitic-and-criminal-economics-3-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p><p></p>Carl Hermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06658884974184959361noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-74763604455091623992011-08-27T15:57:00.001-07:002011-09-03T22:45:26.355-07:00Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic economics. 1 of 4<p></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em><strong>By Carl Herman, </strong></em><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history, who blogs as the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/carl-herman">Nonpartisan Examiner</a> at Examiner.com</span><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>. Carl was one of the leaders who launched the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcredit">microcredit movement</a>, and is a tireless activist for peace and justice.
<br /> </strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;">
<br /> <em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong></strong></em></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica; min-height: 17px;"><em style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><strong>Don't be confused by the title. Carl - like all of us at Washington's Blog - is against violent revolution, following instead the non-violent paths of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. As we have previously written:</strong></em></p><blockquote style="font-weight: bold;"><i>I am NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, I am calling for the reinstatement of our government. I am calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, I am calling for its enforcement.</i></blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0px; font: 14px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0px;"><i>
<br /></i></span></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>My friend and colleague for justice, Washington’s Blog’s author, invited me to “guest blog.” I’ll provide two. First: </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/gandhi-s-on-ending-injustice-speak-the-truth-because-truth-is-god"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Gandhi’s conclusion of the essential importance of speaking Truth</i></span></a><i>. Second: a </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>4-part series</i></span></a><i> to document that current US wars are unlawful, US economic policy is massive criminal fraud, and that these “emperor has no clothes” facts are lied about by US corporate media in constant deception.</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>I appreciate Washington’s Blog’s author for the intellectual integrity and moral courage to document powerful facts; as I appreciate readers’ thoughts, words, and acts of virtue - </i><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Carl Herman</i></span></a><i> </i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">“Constitutional governments and aristocracies are commonly overthrown owing to some deviation from justice…the rich, if the constitution gives them power, are apt to be insolent and avaricious… In all well-attempered governments there is nothing which should be more jealously maintained than the spirit of obedience to law, more especially in small matters; for transgression creeps in unperceived and at last ruins the state, just as the constant recurrence of small expenses in time eats up a fortune.” – Aristotle, <a href="http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.5.five.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Politics, Book V</i></span></a>. 350 B.C.E.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> “The people — <i>the people</i> — are the rightful masters of both Congresses, and courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it.” - "<a href="http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mal&fileName=mal1/018/0189300/malpage.db&recNum=0"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Abraham Lincoln, [September 16-17, 1859] (Notes for Speech in Kansas and Ohio)</span></a>," <a href="http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mal&fileName=mal1/018/0189300/malpage.db&recNum=1"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Page 2</span></a>.</span></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>Revolution </i></b>is from the Latin, <i>revolutio</i>, a “turn around” of political power.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The US public would revolt and end unlawful US wars and banksters’ rigged-casino fraud if they understood and embraced the central facts of these issues. This four-part series of articles provides the central facts, invites passionate public response, and proposes specific revolutionary public action.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Please share the Revolution to end unlawful US wars and return trillions of our dollars to constructive work. With millions of lives at stake (perhaps billions), there is nothing more important for public participation.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Part 1: <b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic/criminal economics</b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 2: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-all-from-known-lies-2-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all begun with lies</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 3: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-parasitic-and-criminal-economics-3-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 4: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose-corporate-media-as-propaganda-4-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">These four articles are academic in language and documentation. My citizen advocacy paper, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/common-sense-for-new-american-revolution-revolt-from-us-government-by-dicts"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>Government by dicts</i></span></a>, has additional resources. _______________________________________________________________________________________________</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>We the People</i></b>: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Current US wars are unlawful. The US economy is transferring unprecedented wealth of trillions of dollars every year to financial elite within corporate cartels that have captured their government regulators. American public recognition of the facts is crippled by corporate media propaganda. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The factual claims of unlawful wars and transferred trillions from taxpayers to cartels are easily verified as objective data, and substantiated by recognized experts cited in this paper. Indeed, you’ll discover that once obfuscating spin is removed, the facts are not contested and therefore uncontroversial. The breakthrough for US Revolution is causing critical mass of public recognition of the “emperor has no clothes” obvious regarding war and money. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">One obstacle is public belief in “American exceptionalism”: “it can’t happen here” or we’re “too modern” for such criminality to exist. This belief exists despite the acknowledged history of every other developed country in the 20th Century engaging in wars of aggressive invasion disguised by government propaganda as “defensive,” and/or wars for empire. Abraham Lincoln empathized with this feeling: </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote>“I know the American People are <i>much</i> attached to their Government;--I know they would suffer <i>much</i> for its sake;--I know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they would ever think of exchanging it for another. Yet, notwithstanding all this, if the laws be continually despised and disregarded, if their rights to be secure in their persons and property, are held by no better tenure than the caprice of a mob, the alienation of their affections from the Government is the natural consequence; and to that, sooner or later, it must come.” – <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/abraham-lincoln-defend-the-us-constitution-from-unlawful-tyrants-within-our-government"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >Abraham Lincoln, Lyceum Address, 1838</span></a>.</blockquote><p></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">This revolution is similar to the Civil Rights Movement if Dr. King had asked <b>you</b> directly for your help, or ending parasitic imperialism if Mohandas Gandhi had asked <b>you</b> personally for your help. How you help is up to you. Look to your heart and mind’s best inspirations. My specific proposals for your consideration are in the last section. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The Civil Rights Movement was a function of transformative civic education with a critical mass of Americans standing for justice under the law. Its foundation was recognition and enforcement of the 1868 legislative victory of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution that promised equal protection under the law. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Ending wars of choice speciously masked as “defensive” is founded upon the US-initiated 1945 legislative victory of the United Nations Charter (UN). Protection of public money is in multiple statutes with its spirit in the Preamble of the US Constitution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The benefits of US Revolution against just these two areas of US political, economic, and media “leadership” crimes are literally peace, trillions of dollars annually freed for constructive investment (yes, trillions every year as I’ll explain, document, corroborate from experts known to you, and prove), transformation of how Americans see themselves in the global community, and perhaps the final breakthrough for humanity to close its entire recorded history of political/economic relationships of vicious antagonism with the transformation of realized cooperation, justice, universal dignity, and unprecedented freedom. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The following proposal for Revolution will take about an hour of your time to read and further time to verify factual accuracy of the claims. However, if you’ve spent more than an hour thinking about the broad national civic education breakthrough to end a vicious history of wars and predatory capitalism, this investment of reading is worthwhile. You’re receiving the comprehensive facts and context of 30 years of my academic and professional work. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Revolution requires intellectual integrity and moral courage, citizen. Although I will present factual claims that are objective data anyone can verify, you already know that some people, even with title and positions in leadership, will viciously spin to avoid public scrutiny to the data. High school education provides everyone with the academic training to identify and crush unprofessional attacks that distract attention away from the facts. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b><i>Stick to the facts. You can do it.</i></b></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You’ve heard of Princeton’s Professor Frankfurt’s 2005 bestselling book that describes how Americans are attacked by political and media “leaders” accurately described in the title: <a href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7929.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>On Bullshi*</i></span></a><i>. </i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">“Bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant… bullshi* is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.”</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">The alternative, of course, is your declining to participate in this Revolution, and not intervene in the murder of millions of human beings in unlawful war, impoverishment of billions of human beings, theft of trillions of our dollars, and corporate media propaganda to hide these Crimes Against Humanity. “Propaganda” is accurate; their lies of commission and omission are obvious when pointed out, as you shall see in this proposal for Revolution. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You will either rightfully receive appreciation for your role in this Revolution or disappointment for rejecting the opportunity. This will come from your <b>family, friends, and the public</b>. Your acts will also reflect for all time in whatever spiritual spheres of influence exist to benefit us.</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">I respectfully remind you of the ancient Greek insult for those who chose non-participation in the most important policy areas; so powerful it has remained un-translated in our language today: <b><i>idiot</i></b><i>.</i></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Other transformative leaders have eloquently written of your position of choice. I’ll allow Rene Descartes to speak of the human condition that <i>we must earn breakthroughs into new light</i>, then present the facts of unlawful US wars and parasitic/criminal US economics. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">"But now, after having once and for all put to the test the judgments of men, I here again approach these same questions regarding God and the human mind, and at the same time treat the beginnings of the whole of first philosophy, but in such a way that I have no expectation of approval from the vulgar and no wide audience of readers. Rather, I am an author to none who read these things but those who seriously meditate with me, who have the ability and the desire to withdraw their mind from the senses and at the same time from all prejudices. Such people I know all too well to be few and far between. As to those who do not take care to comprehend the order and series of my reasons but eagerly dispute over single conclusions by themselves, as is the custom for many-those, I say, will derive little benefit from a reading of this treatise; and although perhaps they might find an occasion for quibbling in many spots, still it is not an easy matter for them to raise an objection that is either compelling or worthy of response." </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">- Rene Descartes, </span><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">Meditations on First Philosophy</span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">, 1641, "Preface to the Reader." Descartes is considered the founder of modern philosophy, the founder of analytical geometry (which led to calculus), and a founder of the Scientific Revolution. Descartes was well-known in his age, but highly controversial. His work was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633, and his books put on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1663. The University of Utrecht condemned his work in 1643, where he had previously taught. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">In respectful appreciation of the hour or so we’ll spend together, please understand the art of my communication to you must balance respect for your time with the requirement for sufficient documentation to prove these disturbing claims beyond any reasonable doubt. </span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">"At first blush, a man is not capable of reporting truth; he must be drenched and saturated with it first."</span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">- Henry David Thoreau, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3FEJA_dAewgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=henry+david+thoreau+i+to+myself&source=bl&ots=gIK0MAnvwZ&sig=yhFToDnWwWK7WXHd5ETXitfPit8&hl=en&ei=uMvQS_vIM4LStgOPh9GMCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" ><i>I to myself: an annotated selection from the journal of Henry D. Thoreau</i></span></a><i>, 1837. </i>Thoreau, like Abraham Lincoln <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/abraham-lincoln-on-unconstitutional-us-wars-of-invasion-courageously-standing-against-obvious-lies"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;" >in a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives</span></a>, recognized the claimed “reasons” for a “defensive war” against Mexico were obvious lies when inspected. </span></p> <p color="#0928a7" style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; "></p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;" >Part 2: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-all-from-known-lies-2-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all begun with lies</b></span></a></span></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p><p></p>Carl Hermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06658884974184959361noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-60358696746628931142011-08-27T07:08:00.000-07:002011-08-27T09:38:34.236-07:00Drowning Government in a Hurricane (Why Wait for a Bathtub?)<p><em><strong>By leading anti-war activist David Swanson, author of <a href="http://davidswanson.org/book">Day Break</a> and <a href="http://davidswanson.org/warisalie">War Is A Lie</a>, who runs the websites <a href="http://davidswanson.org/">DavidSwanson.org</a> and <a href="http://warisacrime.org/">WarIsACrime.org</a> (formerly AfterDowningStreet.org)<a href="http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/"></a>.
<br /></strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em>"Shrinking government" in American political discourse has, for decades now, meant the following. We enlarge the government's budget through taxation and penalties on working people and through borrowing and printing money. We not only tax the wealthy and corporations less, but we massively subsidize them with public funds. We move away from taxes and fees meant to limit the damage greed can do to the world, and we defund regulation of and law enforcement against the oligarchy. We transfer an ever greater share of the budget to the military. We expand the domestic and international surveillance-police states while merging the two. This, again, we call "shrinking government."</p><p>"Shrinking government" means a larger and more oppressive but less representative and less useful government. The military gets the money and gets privatized (employs non-competitive corporations working exclusively for the government). Education and public services get slashed and get privatized. Vote counting gets privatized. The privatized money gets to flow into election campaigns. The districts are re-gerrymandered with the latest modern technology. The media conglomerates get a monopoly and the monopoly limits electoral possibilities. "Shrinking government" means shrinking popular influence on government while government grows. But it grows in its ability to wage wars, occupy territories, and subsidize coal, oil, nuclear, and gas. It shrinks in its ability to give people anything in return for their taxes and fees. If this process continues it must result in ever greater repression or in revolt.</p><p>But why is THAT called "shrinking government"? It doesn't look like shrinking government.</p><p>It's called that in part because there is a movement from the right that talks about shrinking the government to a size that will permit drowning it in a bathtub. But a good portion of this movement wants to shrink everything except the military-police state, which is the most difficult thing to shrink. And the Republican politicians who co-opt this movement want to enlarge the military and police.</p><p>Perhaps more importantly, the Democrats and their loyal pseudo-activist groups want to protect or enlarge education and public services, but when it comes to the military they either want to enlarge it or are content to step aside and watch it grow. Advocates of tearing down everything useful in the government are winning, while advocates of making greater public use of government are losing, and so we talk about the "shrinking government" while the "security" budget balloons to $1.2 trillion per year.</p><p>I recently complained to the staffers of a large activist organization (which I'll be badgered for not naming, but which I am not naming because this exchange was on a confidential listserve) that they were producing television ads blaming "the Republicans" for everything. They replied that this was in fact a good way to alert the Democrats that if they became as bad as the Republicans they'd be criticized too.</p><p>How so, I asked. The Democrats split right down the middle on their votes for the Satan's Sandwich Super-Congress Budget-Destruction Deal. Half of them voted yes and half no. Didn't an ad blaming the Republicans signal to those Democrats who had voted Yes that they would have a free pass up until the moment they called themselves Republicans? Wouldn't it be better to address the government as the people, leave the parties out of it, praise those who did right, and pressure those who did wrong?</p><p>Oh no, I was told, nothing critical must be said of the government, because the right-wing position is that government is bad and must be "shrunk"; the good liberal position is that government is good.</p><p>But hold on a second, I replied, are you actually suggesting that the government isn't broken? We've got 85% of the country believing correctly that our government is broken, and you want to pretend it's working in order to avoid "shrinking" it?</p><p>The reply I received was that I was adopting a right-wing discourse by speaking of "government" in a manner that did not include firefighters and sanitation workers.</p><p>Huh?</p><p>We can't notice that our government is destroying the planet as a habitable space, slaughtering people, and impoverishing us because there are still fire fighters who put out fires and sanitation workers who clean streets (even though they sometimes now stand and watch houses burn, and even though they are being defunded by the part of the government that funds and defunds things)? The fact is that the government is broken. Any reality-based politics has to start there. The majority of Americans understand the solution to that problem as creating better government. It's only an obnoxious and intimidating fringe group that believes "government is broken" leads inevitably to "shrink government."</p><p>And so, we talk about the "shrinking government" because nobody will talk about the breaking government from the left. Not just groups, but individuals as well, have embedded their souls in the Democratic Party. They can only bring themselves to criticize the Republican Party while maintaining that, after all, the government is doing a pretty good job, even when the government is dominated by Republicans and right-wing Democrats who are at least as far to the right as the Republicans. This incoherence is created by liberal civilians, not presidential broken promises or pre-compromises or lack of resolve.</p><p>This is where hurricanes and earthquakes come in. "Shrinking government" is never going to get the thing down to the size that can be drowned in a bathtub, because it keeps growing as it "shrinks." But oil wars, fracking, clean coal, safe nukes, global warming, and the weirding of the weather are going to reach our government where its most sensitive nerves are situated: in its ass. The Pentagon sits along the Potomac River, and that river can do more damage than an airplane. The slaves who built the U.S. Capitol and White House did not employ the latest earthquake-resistant technology. No array of metal-detectors, cancer-radiators, groping guards, or concrete barriers can withstand the quaking of the earth.</p><p>When the plagues of locusts reach Washington, no transformation to democracy will immediately result. The billions of dollars lost won't be credited to the renewable-energy side of the public ledger. The coastal homes of the gazillionaires will be rebuilt at public expense. Eric Cantor's district will suck down plenty of socialistic disaster relief. The Pentagon will be protected in ways that New Orleans just doesn't deserve. The machine will be oiled and tuned up and keep on rolling along.</p><p>But the chance of the public actively and effectively resisting ( <a href="http://october2011.org/" _cke_saved_href="http://october2011.org">http://october2011.org</a> ) will increase, and the chance of certain Congress Members finding their consciences unprompted will increase as well.</p><p>I'm not hoping for natural disasters; and hoping for natural disasters doesn't actually cause them. I'm suggesting that as they come in greater strength and frequency, we be prepared to speak honestly about what is needed. It's not shrinking or growing the government. It's not rebuilding dreams or retaking parties or winning the future.</p><p>What's needed is independent resolve that government of, by, and for the people shall not perish from this earth.</p>davidswansonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10504910392531997676noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-64293757658973694282011-08-26T20:22:00.000-07:002011-08-26T21:36:07.976-07:00The Chopping Block?<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.centerforeconomicstability.com.au/?s2member_file_download=TheChoppingBlock.pdf" target="_blank">Click here for this post in PDF</a></p><em><strong>By Steve Keen, Associate Professor of Economics & Finance at the University of Western Sydney, author of <a href="http://www.debunkingeconomics.com/">Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor of the Social Sciences</a> and writer at his own blog, <a href="http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/">DebtDeflation.com</a>.
<br />
<br />
<br /></strong></em>Reality came to Reality TV in Australia last week, when 3 of the 4 properties in the much-hyped "Flip that House" program <a href="http://homes.ninemsn.com.au/theblock/" target="_blank">The Block</a> failed to sell at their nationally televised auction. A 400 person live audience, watched by over 3 million TV viewers, couldn't entice more than one person to part with money rather than eyeballs. As the SMH observed:
<br /><blockquote>
<br /><p style="text-align: justify;">Whatever the lure of a celebrity house, the would-be buyers in Fitzroy Town Hall were just as jittery as the would-be buyers at any other auction in recent weeks. ("<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/auction-failure-shocks-the-block-20110821-1j4tb.html" target="_blank">Auction failure shocks The Block</a>", SMH August 22)</p>
<br /></blockquote>
<br />The remaining three properties sold in the week after the sale, but at a substantial loss compared to the initial purchase prices plus the sums expended on them by the 4 couples in their 2 months of televised renovations (and let's not mention the advertising budget).
<br />
<br />So is the chopping of The Block a sign that the days of ever-rising house prices are over? Not if you listen to Chris Joye ("<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Australian-house-prices-forecast-property-interest-pd20110825-L33CW?OpenDocument&src=kgb" target="_blank">Property's fine forecast</a>", Business Spectator 25th August 2011). The median forecast of the "21 leading market economists" he polled was for 5% growth in nominal house prices per annum for the next ten years, which Chris notes would suggest "that they will likely be 55 per cent higher in 10 years' time".
<br />
<br />Good luck with that. As Chris notes, my forecast wasn't included, but it should be no surprise that I expect a fall in house prices of about 40% over the same time period.
<br />
<br />I differ with the 20 who predicted positive price growth for one simple reason: I focus on the role of debt in driving house prices. Having argued that debt drove prices up over the last 15 years, I now expect debt to drive them down again.
<br />
<br />The mechanism is simple—but it's not part of conventional "Neoclassical" economics, which is why Chris and his surveyed market economists don't consider it. Aggregate demand is the sum of income <em>plus the change in debt</em>, and this is spent on both goods and services and assets. There is thus a link between the <em>change in debt</em> and the <em>level</em> of asset prices (and the fraction sold, and the quantity produced, but I'll focus just on just house prices for now).
<br />
<br />Going one step further, the change in aggregate demand is the change in income <em>plus the acceleration of debt</em>. There is thus a link between the <em>acceleration of debt</em> and the <em>rate of change of house prices</em>. If this relationship is strong, then rising house prices require that the rate of growth of debt rises over time.
<br />
<br />So just how strong is the relationship? Using the RBA's data on mortgage debt from 1992 till now (there was a break in the series in 1991) and the ABS House Price Index, the correlation between accelerating mortgage debt and the change in real house prices is 0.42 and highly significant—see Figure 1.<sup>
<br /></sup>
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 1: The Mortgage Debt Accelerator and change in real house prices
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping1.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />The acceleration in mortgage debt has been volatile, but on average positive. For two decades, mortgage debt has accelerated at 0.5% of GDP per annum. Can that continue for the next ten years?
<br />
<br />No way. That sustained acceleration of debt has caused mortgage debt to rising dramatically, from less than 30% of household disposable income in 1991, to a peak of 135% of disposable income early in 2011 (see Figure 2).
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 2: A 4.5 times increase in mortgage debt compared to disposable income over 2 decades
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping2.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />That's a 4.5-fold increase over 20 years, compared to the 50% fall in mortgage rates across the same period.<sup>
<br /></sup> Simply paying the interest on outstanding mortgage debt now consumes over 8% of household disposable income, versus 4% back in 1991—and less than 2% in the 1970s.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 3: A fourfold increase in mortgage servicing vosts since 1980
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping3.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />The situation is worse when debt repayment is taken into account. The cost of paying a 25 year variable rate mortgage on the average First Home Loan has risen from 45% of Average Weekly Earnings (AWE) in 1991 to 63% now—and it peaked at 74% of AWE before the "unexpected" Global Financial Crisis forced the RBA to drastically cut rates in 2008.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 4: It now takes 2/3rds of the average wage to become a First Home Buyer
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping4.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />Chris realistically observes that household leverage can't rise any further, but implies that this is neutral for house prices. But stabilising debt is <em>not</em> neutral for house prices: since debt levels have risen till now, a stable debt level in the future means decelerating debt and falling house prices. Figure 5 shows that the deceleration (on an annual basis) began in October 2010, and it has gathered pace since.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 5: Mortgage debt decelerating
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping5.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />If rather than stabilising debt, Australian households start to reduce their debt as US households have done (see Figure 6), then house prices would need to defy the gravity of decelerating debt to keep rising at the 5% nominal rate (roughly a 2% real rate) that Chris Joye predicts for the next decade.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 6: Mortgage debt in the USA is now falling
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping6.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />Of course, this is Australia, where the world is upside down: maybe "this place is different"?
<br />
<br />It will need to be, if the US post-Bubble experience is anything to go by. The relationship between mortgage debt acceleration and change in house prices has held up through the ups and the downs of the US market since 1986 (with a correlation of 0.78)—see Figure 7. The US experience since 2006 shows what is likely to happen here as the debt bubble that fed the housing bubble finally comes to an end.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 7: Debt acceleration determines change in US house prices
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping7.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />The final retort to the argument that house prices will crash here as they have elsewhere is that there hasn't been a bubble here, so a crash can't happen. Chris acknowledges that house prices have risen faster than disposable income per household in Australia, but attributes that to rational rather than bubble factors:
<br /><blockquote>
<br /><p style="text-align: justify;">By way of historical context, disposable income on a per household basis has averaged a healthy 5.8 per cent per annum over the last 10 years, and 4.9 per cent per annum over the past 18 years.</p>
<br /></blockquote>
<br /><blockquote>
<br /><p style="text-align: justify;">Yet for a range of reasons that I have explained many times before – including the once-off, 40 per cent plus reduction in nominal interest rates over the 1980 to 2011 period – historical house price appreciation has consistently outperformed disposable income growth.</p>
<br /></blockquote>
<br /><blockquote>
<br /><p style="text-align: justify;">For example, we estimate that between 1982 and 2011 median Australian house prices rose at a 7.7 per cent compound annual growth rate. ("<a href="http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Australian-house-prices-forecast-property-interest-pd20110825-L33CW?OpenDocument&src=kgb" target="_blank">Property's fine forecast</a>", Business Spectator 25th August 2011)</p>
<br /></blockquote>
<br />Firstly, as noted earlier, a 40% fall in interest rates can't explain the 4.5-fold increase in the household debt to income ratio. Secondly, the argument that debt levels have risen because interest rates have fallen can't explain why debt levels were much lower in the 1960s when interest rates were also lower than today. If households responded rationally to the fall in rates by increasing debt levels in the 1990s, why didn't they respond rationally to the increase in rates during the 70s by reducing debt levels?
<br />
<br />Mortgage debt almost doubled as a percentage of household disposable income from the mid-1970s till the early 1990s, even though interest rates (adjusted for inflation) increased from minus 4% to over 10% across that period. The debt ratio also increased from 75% to over 120% between 2001 and 2008, when real mortgage rates rose from 0.5% to 6.4% (see Figure 8).
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 8: Mortgage debt rose before real interest rates fell
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping8.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />Rather than changes in debt levels reflecting rational, equilibrium responses to changes in interest rates, the growth in mortgage debt was the fuel for a Ponzi Scheme that has propelled house prices far faster than incomes have risen.
<br /><h2>Bubbles upon Bubbles</h2>
<br />There have been 3 big bubbles in Australian housing in the last 50 years, all driven by accelerating levels of private debt: the late-60s to early 70s bubble focused on Sydney; the 1988 bubble when the 2<sup>nd</sup> incarnation of the First Home Vendors Scheme transferred speculation from the busted stock market into housing; and our current one since 1997, which has been driven by accelerating mortgage debt and government policy—by both Liberal and Labor—with the First Home Vendors Scheme being used to give the economy a sharp stimulus to avoid recession.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 9: Bubbles upon bubbles in Australian housing
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping9.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />These bubbles have been built on each other only because the debt has continued to accelerate. But now that Australia has reached a mortgage debt to GDP ratio that exceeds the worst ever experienced in the USA (see Figure 10), the days of accelerating mortgage debt are over—and so are the days of prices rising faster than incomes.
<br />
<br /><span style="color: rgb(79, 129, 189);font-size:9pt;" ><strong>Figure 10: Mortgage debt grew faster in Australia than in the USA
<br /></strong></span>
<br />
<br /><img src="http://cdn.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/082711_0254_TheChopping10.png" alt="" />
<br />
<br />Even to simply eliminate the impact of the last bubble that began in 1997, prices would need to fall 40 percent (compared to incomes) from their current levels. Australia is now starting to experience the same process of debt deleveraging and falling house prices that America has been mired in for the last five years. The one saving grace we have is China—so long as China continues to grow and drive demand and prices for our raw materials. But as recent economic data has indicated, even China may not be enough to stop unemployment rising in Australia, now that Australia's debt driven love affair with house prices is on The Chopping Block.Steve Keenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01676922652945636020noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-59465307177855204012011-08-26T17:40:00.000-07:002011-08-27T00:32:36.995-07:00The Same Type of Corruption and Collusion Between Big Companies and Their Government Regulators That Exists In Finance And Energy May Also Infect The Anti-Cancer Industry<p>
<br /></p><p>According to the documentary movie <span style="font-style: italic;">Burzynski</span>:
<br /></p><ul><li>A 1992 law - the Prescription Drug User Fee Act - puts the FDA on the payroll of the pharmaceutical industry. The FDA gets more than half of its money from the pharmaceutical industry
<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Many FDA advisors are also consultants to big drug companies</li></ul><ul><li>The FDA has said that only giant pharmaceutical companies with very deep pockets - not individuals - should be granted the right to create anti-cancer treatments</li></ul><ul><li>The FDA deems it irrelevant whether or not anti-cancer treatments work</li></ul><ul><li>The same corruption and collusion between big companies and their governmental regulators that exists in finance, politics and energy also infects the anti-cancer industry
<br /></li></ul><span style="font-size:180%;"><a href="http://documentarychannel.com/movie.php?currID=9686&t=Burzynski:%20Cancer%20is%20Serious%20Business">Click here to watch.</a></span> (I'm having trouble embedding the video).
<br />
<br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The movie is an hour and forty-eight minutes long, but very well made, and definitely worth the time. </span><span style="font-style: italic;">For more information, </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.burzynskimovie.com/">see this</a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span>
<br /><p></p><p><span style="font-style: italic;">Note: I am not a health care professional, and have no expertise </span><span style="font-style: italic;">of any nature whatsoever </span><span style="font-style: italic;">in the fields of medicine or cancer. This does not constitute medical or healthcare advice.
<br /></span></p><p>
<br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-28734572747368942482011-08-26T17:28:00.000-07:002011-08-28T08:13:11.857-07:00Gandhi on ending injustice: Speak the truth because Truth is God<p></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><i></i></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><i></i></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><i></i></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>
<br /></i></span></i></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><i><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>My friend and colleague for justice, Washington’s Blog’s author, invited me to “guest blog.” I’ll provide two. First: </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/gandhi-s-on-ending-injustice-speak-the-truth-because-truth-is-god"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;"><i>Gandhi’s conclusion of the essential importance of speaking Truth</i></span></a><i>. Second: a </i><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;"><i>4-part series</i></span></a><i> to document that current US wars are unlawful, US economic policy is massive criminal fraud, and that these “emperor has no clothes” facts are lied about by US corporate media in constant deception.</i></span></i></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 17px; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i></i></span>
<br /></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><i>I appreciate Washington’s Blog’s author for the intellectual integrity and moral courage to document powerful facts; as I also appreciate all thoughts, words, and acts of virtue of the readers. - </i><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;"><i>Carl Herman</i></span></a><i> </i></span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 17px; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"></span>
<br /></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b></b></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; "><b>“It is more correct to say that Truth is God than to say God is truth. ...we must speak the Truth.”</b> - <a href="http://www.gandhi-manibhavan.org/gandhiphilosophy/philosophy_truth_meaning.htm"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">Gandhi on Truth</span></a> (and <a href="http://www.gandhistudycentre.org/pdf/truth.pdf"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">here</span></a>, pg. 20)</span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic; letter-spacing: 0px; "><b></b></span><p style="font-style: italic; "></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">US injustice in major policies will end when enough Americans speak the truth. The injustice is literal: US government policies with war and economics are in Orwellian violation of basic laws. The annual costs are millions of human lives, billions damned to suffer, and trillions of dollars looted. </span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Anyone with intellectual integrity and moral courage can see and say these <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">“emperor has no clothes” facts</span></a>.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Assessing US “leadership” as <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/psychopaths-the-perfect-academic-word-for-us-political-economic-leadership"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">psychopathic</span></a> is the perfect academic and professional word because it neither understates nor overstates the facts. I also suggest Princeton professor Frankfurt’s academic term for the type of lies that “leadership” uses: <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/bullshit-the-perfect-academic-word-for-us-debt-economic-war-policies"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;"><i>bullshit</i></span></a>. </span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b></b></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; ">“As I grow older, I pay less attention to what men say. I just watch what they do.” - unsourced and attributed to Andrew Carnegie</span></blockquote><p style="font-style: italic; "></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Gandhi was clear to state and repeat the facts until critical mass of public understanding and action ended the injustice:</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b></b></span></p><blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; ">"One thing we have endeavoured to observe most scrupulously, namely, never to depart from the strictest facts and, in dealing with the difficult questions that have arisen during the year, we hope that we have used the utmost moderation possible under the circumstances. Our duty is very simple and plain. We want to serve the community, and in our own humble way to serve the Empire. We believe in the righteousness of the cause, which it is our privilege to espouse. We have an abiding faith in the mercy of the Almighty God, and we have firm faith in the British Constitution. That being so, we should fail in our duty if we wrote anything with a view to hurt. Facts we would always place before our readers, whether they are palatable or not, and it is by placing them constantly before the public in their nakedness that the misunderstanding… can be removed." - Mohandas K. Gandhi, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Opinion"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">Indian Opinion</span></a> (1 October 1903)</span></blockquote><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; "> </span><p></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Dr. Martin Luther King learned from Gandhi:</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b></b></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; ">“‘A time comes when silence is betrayal.’ That time has come for us... The truth of these words is beyond doubt but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government's policy, especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one's own bosom and in the surrounding world.</span></p> <p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">... A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. ... A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. ... A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. ...We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate. And history is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate.</span></p> <p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0px; ">... These are revolutionary times.” - Dr. Martin Luther King, “<a href="http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html%20"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence</span></a>” </span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "></p></blockquote><p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Again, the basic explanation, documentation, and proof of US “leadership” crimes <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-parasitic-economics-1-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">is here</span></a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">. </span></p><p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; ">I do not place myself in Gandhi and Dr. King’s company, and I assume that neither do you. But I do suggest that We the People are like in spirit and will stand for Truth in the face of War Criminals and destruction of trillions of families’ and children’s dollars. </p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 14.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You should also know that the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/mlk-assassinated-by-us-government-martin-luther-king-civil-1999-decision"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color: #0928a7">King family's civil trial found the US government guilty of Dr. King's assassination</span></a>. <b>US Corporate media refused to cover the trial or interview Dr. King's wife</b>. His family's opinion is that the US government murdered Dr. King to end his protests against unlawful US wars and his call to end poverty.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Following are further resources to explain and document US "emperor has no clothes" obvious injustice:</span></p> <ol style="font-style: italic; list-style-type: decimal; "> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Congressional reports disclose that all “reasons” for war with Afghanistan and Iraq <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/are-us-wars-iraq-and-afghanistan-well-intended-mistakes-what-we-now-know-from-the-evidence"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">were known to be lies as they were told</span></a>.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Orwellian <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-all-from-known-lies-2-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">unlawful wars</span></a>, including using <a href="http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/04/depleted-uranium-is-destroying-life-by.html"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">depleted uranium weapons</span></a> to damn victims with continuous misery and death.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">obfuscating from the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/trillion-dollars-debt-ceiling-lies-americans-will-prevail-with-3-simple-facts"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">obvious answer</span></a> of ending an Orwellian "debt supply" and replacing it with money.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">allowing a million children a month to die of preventable poverty, even though historically <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/economics-of-ending-poverty-0-7-of-gni-is-all-it-takes"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">ending poverty</span></a> reduces population growth rate and the investment is less than 1% of the developed nations' gross national incomes (GNI).</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica; color:#0928a7;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px ;color:#000000;"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/obama-joins-bush-congress-as-war-criminals-for-false-imprisonment-torture-at-bagram-prison"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">torture</span></a>, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/official-us-policy-kill-american-citizens-when-president-fuhrer-declares-them-terrorists"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">extrajudicial assassinations</span></a> (<a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/if-us-government-calls-you-an-american-citizen-terrorist-the-constitution-is-gone-torture-s-on"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">including against American citizens</span></a>) and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/senators-mccain-and-liebermann-indefinitely-detain-americans-if-they-say-so"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px">indefinite detentions</span></a>. </span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">destruction of the US Constitution into a form of government <a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/american-fascism-by-political-definition-the-us-is-now-fascist-not-a-constitutional-republic"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">closest to fascism</span></a> and nowhere near a constitutional republic.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">literally throwing Americans onto the streets rather than take <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/us-revolution-unleashes-trillions-of-dollars-obvious-economic-solutions"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">any of a dozen acts</span></a> to allow them to stay in their homes.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">intentional unemployment, crime, infrastructure decay, fear, anger, depression (both economic and psychological) <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/revolt-us-could-have-full-employment-but-chooses-our-misery-decay-death"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">rather than create money for full employment</span></a>.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">allowing <a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-parasitic-criminal-economics-3-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">45,000 Americans to die every year from lack of health care</span></a>, even though universal single-payer saves the nation $100-$300 billion every year.</span></li> <li style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Helvetica"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose-corporate-media-as-propaganda-4-of-4"><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;">US corporate media complicity</span></a> to lie by omission and commission to keep the above facts unrecognized by the American public.</span></li> </ol> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"><b>The good news</b> is that every step "leadership" takes down their path of deceit and destruction, they become easier to recognize for what they are.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="text-decoration: underline ; letter-spacing: 0.0px color:#0928a7;"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/why-we-the-people-will-win-the-new-american-revolution-against-us-fascism">We will win with critical mass</a></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px"> of public recognition of what’s right in front of everyone to objectively verify.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">You, citizen, have unique opportunity to contribute your unique, beautiful, and powerful self-expression to building a brighter future if you choose the intellectual integrity and moral courage to do so.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Please do.</span></p> <p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">Millions will live or die, billions will have a life worth living or misery, and trillions of dollars of power are directed at our collective choice.</span></p><p style="font-style: italic; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 14px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Helvetica; "><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px">An artistic expression of Gandhi is the 4-minute video by <span style="text-decoration: underline; letter-spacing: 0px; color:#0928a7;"><a href="http://mcyogi.com/">MC Yogi</a></span>.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>Carl Hermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06658884974184959361noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-579162019917112602011-08-26T15:33:00.000-07:002011-08-26T16:20:51.836-07:00"The First Recorded Word For ‘Freedom’ In Any Human Language Is The Sumerian Amargi, A Word For Debt-Freedom ... If Aristotle Were Around Today, He’d Probably Conclude That Most Americans Were, For All Intents And Purposes, Slaves"<p>
<br /></p><p>I've previously <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/economics-professor-well-have-never.html">noted</a> that top economists say will have a never-ending depression unless we repudiate the mountains of bad debt choking the world, that repudiating bad debt is moral, legal, empowering and popular.
<br /></p><p>I've <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/10/michael-hudson-debt-grows-exponentially.html">pointed out</a> that debt always grows exponentially, while the real economy can only grow in an "s-curve", and so periodic debt jubilees are needed. And that we have <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/we-have-forgotten-what-ancient.html">forgotten what the ancient Sumerians and Babylonians, the early Jews and Christians, the Founding Fathers and even Napoleon Bonaparte knew about money and debt</a>.
<br /></p><p>And I've reported that the money of individuals, businesses, cities, states and entire nations is <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/worlds-money-is-draining-away-wheres-it.html">disappearing into the abyss</a> of debt, and that - <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/government-didnt-temporarily-help-banks.html">by choosing the pretend creditors over the little guy - the government is dooming both to failure</a>.</p><p>Today, NakedCapitalism has a great <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/what-is-debt-%E2%80%93-an-interview-with-economic-anthropologist-david-graeber.html">interview</a> with professor of social anthropology - and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Debt-First-5-000-Years/dp/1933633867">debt expert</a> - David Graeber, touching on many of these themes.
<br /></p><p>Here are must-read excerpts from the interview:
<br /></p><p><em></em></p><blockquote><strong>Interviewer (Journalist Philip Pilkington)</strong>: Most economists claim that money was invented to replace the barter system. But you’ve found something quite different, am I correct? <p><strong>David Graeber</strong>: Yes there’s a standard story we’re all taught, a ‘once upon a time’ — it’s a fairy tale. </p> <p>***
<br /></p><p>Rather than the standard story – first there’s barter, then money, then finally credit comes out of that – if anything its precisely the other way around. Credit and debt comes first, then coinage emerges thousands of years later and then, when you do find “I’ll give you twenty chickens for that cow” type of barter systems, it’s usually when there used to be cash markets, but for some reason – as in Russia, for example, in 1998 – the currency collapses or disappears.
<br /></p>***<p>This was the great social evil of antiquity – families would have to start pawning off their flocks, fields and before long, their wives and children would be taken off into debt peonage. Often people would start abandoning the cities entirely, joining semi-nomadic bands, threatening to come back in force and overturn the existing order entirely. Rulers would regularly conclude the only way to prevent complete social breakdown was to declare a clean slate or ‘washing of the tablets,’ they’d cancel all consumer debt and just start over. <span style="font-weight: bold;">In fact, the first recorded word for ‘freedom’ in any human language is the Sumerian amargi, a word for debt-freedom</span>, and by extension freedom more generally, which literally means ‘return to mother,’ since when they declared a clean slate, all the debt peons would get to go home.</p>***<p>Taxes are also key to creating the first markets that operate on cash, since <span style="font-weight: bold;">coinage seems to be invented or at least widely popularized to pay soldiers – more or less simultaneously in China, India, and the Mediterranean, where governments find the easiest way to provision the troops is to issue them standard-issue bits of gold or silver and then demand everyone else in the kingdom give them one of those coins back again.</span> Thus we find that the language of debt and the language of morality start to merge. </p> <p>In Sanskrit, Hebrew, Aramaic, ‘debt,’ ‘guilt,’ and ‘sin’ are actually the same word. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Much of the language of the great religious movements – reckoning, redemption, karmic accounting and the like – are drawn from the language of ancient finance. </span>But that language is always found wanting and inadequate and twisted around into something completely different. It’s as if the great prophets and religious teachers had no choice but to start with that kind of language because it’s the language that existed at the time, but they only adopted it so as to turn it into its opposite: as a way of saying <span style="font-weight: bold;">debts are not sacred, but forgiveness of debt, or the ability to wipe out debt, or to realize that debts aren’t real – these are the acts that are truly sacred.</span></p> <p>How did this happen? Well, remember I said that <span style="font-weight: bold;">the big question in the origins of money is how a sense of obligation – an ‘I owe you one’ – turns into something that can be precisely quantified? Well, the answer seems to be: when there is a potential for violence. If you give someone a pig and they give you a few chickens back you might think they’re a cheapskate, and mock them, but you’re unlikely to come up with a mathematical formula for exactly how cheap you think they are. If someone pokes out your eye in a fight, or kills your brother, that’s when you start saying, “traditional compensation is exactly twenty-seven heifers of the finest quality and if they’re not of the finest quality, this means war!</span>” </p> <p>Money, in the sense of exact equivalents, seems to emerge from situations like that, but also, war and plunder, the disposal of loot, slavery. In early Medieval Ireland, for example, slave-girls were the highest denomination of currency. And you could specify the exact value of everything in a typical house even though very few of those items were available for sale anywhere because they were used to pay fines or damages if someone broke them. </p> <p>But once you understand that <span style="font-weight: bold;">taxes and money largely begin with war it becomes easier to see what really happened. After all, every Mafiosi understands this. If you want to take a relation of violent extortion, sheer power, and turn it into something moral, and most of all, make it seem like the victims are to blame, you turn it into a relation of debt. “You owe me, but I’ll cut you a break for now…” Most human beings in history have probably been told this by their debtors. And the crucial thing is: what possible reply can you make but, “wait a minute, who owes what to who here?” And of course for thousands of years, that’s what the victims have said, but the moment you do, you are using the rulers’ language, you’re admitting that debt and morality really are the same thing. That’s the situation the religious thinkers were stuck with, so they started with the language of debt, and then they tried to turn it around and make it into something else.</span></p> <p><strong>PP</strong>: You’d be forgiven for thinking this was all very Nietzschean. In his ‘On the Genealogy of Morals’ the German philosopher Friedrich <span style="font-weight: bold;">Nietzsche famously argued that all morality was founded upon the extraction of debt under the threat of violence. </span>The sense of obligation instilled in the debtor was, for Nietzsche, the origin of civilisation itself.
<br /></p><p>***
<br /></p><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">DG</span>: If however you ditch the whole myth of barter, and start with a community where people do have prior moral relations, and then ask, how do those moral relations come to be framed as ‘debts’ – that is, as something precisely quantified, impersonal, and therefore, transferrable – well, that’s an entirely different question. In that case, yes, you do have to start with the role of violence.</p>
<br />***
<br />
<br />What do people who don’t use money actually do when things change hands? Anthropologists had documented an endless variety of such economic systems, but hadn’t really worked out common principles. What Mauss noticed was that in almost all of them, everyone pretended as if they were just giving one another gifts and then they fervently denied they expected anything back. But in actual fact everyone understood there were implicit rules and recipients would feel compelled to make some sort of return. <p>What fascinated Mauss was that this seemed to be universally true, even today. If I take a free-market economist out to dinner he’ll feel like he should return the favor and take me out to dinner later. He might even think that he is something of chump if he doesn’t and this even if his theory tells him he just got something for nothing and should be happy about it. Why is that? What is this force that compels me to want to return a gift? </p> <p>This is an important argument, and it shows there is always a certain morality underlying what we call economic life.
<br /></p><p>***
<br /></p> <p><strong></strong> Money has, for most of its history, been a strange hybrid entity that takes on aspects of both commodity (object) and credit (social relation.) What I think I’ve managed to add to that is the historical realization that while money has always been both, it swings back and forth – there are periods where credit is primary, and everyone adopts more or less Chartalist theories of money and others where cash tends to predominate and commodity theories of money instead come to the fore. <span style="font-weight: bold;">We tend to forget that in, say, the Middle Ages, from France to China, </span>Chartalism was just common sense: <span style="font-weight: bold;"> money was just a social convention; in practice, it was whatever the king was willing to accept in taxes. </span></p>***<p>The last time we saw a broad shift from commodity money to credit money it wasn’t a very pretty sight. To name a few we had the fall of the Roman Empire, the Kali Age in India and the breakdown of the Han dynasty… There was a lot of death, catastrophe and mayhem. The final outcome was in many ways profoundly libratory for the bulk of those who lived through it – chattel slavery, for example, was largely eliminated from the great civilizations. This was a remarkable historical achievement. The decline of cities actually meant most people worked far less. But still, one does rather hope the dislocation won’t be quite so epic in its scale this time around. Especially since the actual means of destruction are so much greater this time around.</p>***
<br />
<br />In the past, periods dominated by virtual credit money have also been periods where there have been social protections for debtors. Once you recognize that money is just a social construct, a credit, an IOU, then first of all what is to stop people from generating it endlessly? And how do you prevent the poor from falling into debt traps and becoming effectively enslaved to the rich? That’s why you had Mesopotamian clean slates, Biblical Jubilees, Medieval laws against usury in both Christianity and Islam and so on and so forth. <p>Since antiquity the worst-case scenario that everyone felt would lead to total social breakdown was a major debt crisis; ordinary people would become so indebted to the top one or two percent of the population that they would start selling family members into slavery, or eventually, even themselves. </p> <p>Well, what happened this time around? <span style="font-weight: bold;">Instead of creating some sort of overarching institution to protect debtors, they create these grandiose, world-scale institutions like the IMF or S&P to protect creditors. They essentially declare (in defiance of all traditional economic logic) that no debtor should ever be allowed to default. Needless to say the result is catastrophic. We are experiencing something that to me, at least, looks exactly like what the ancients were most afraid of: a population of debtors skating at the edge of disaster. </span></p> <p>And, I might add, <span style="font-weight: bold;">if Aristotle were around today</span>, I very much doubt he would think that the distinction between renting yourself or members of your family out to work and selling yourself or members of your family to work was more than a legal nicety. <span style="font-weight: bold;">He’d probably conclude that most Americans were, for all intents and purposes, slaves</span>. </p> <p><strong>PP</strong>: You mention that the IMF and S&P are institutions that are mainly geared toward extracting debts for creditors. This seems to have become the case in the European monetary union too. What do you make of the situation in Europe at the moment?</p> <p><strong>DG</strong>: Well, I think this is a prime example of why existing arrangements are clearly untenable. Obviously the ‘whole debt’ cannot be paid. But even when some French banks offered voluntary write-downs for Greece, the others insisted they would treat it as if it were a default anyway. The UK takes the even weirder position that this is true even of debts the government owes to banks that have been nationalized – that is, technically, that they owe to themselves! If that means that disabled pensioners are no longer able to use public transit or youth centers have to be closed down, well that’s simply the ‘reality of the situation,’ as they put it. </p> <p><span style="font-weight: bold;">These ‘realities’ are being increasingly revealed to simply be ones of power. Clearly any pretence that markets maintain themselves, that debts always have to be honored, went by the boards in 2008.</span> That’s one of the reasons I think you see the beginnings of a reaction in a remarkably similar form to what we saw during the heyday of the ‘Third World debt crisis’ – what got called, rather weirdly, the ‘anti-globalization movement’. This movement called for genuine democracy and actually tried to practice forms of direct, horizontal democracy. In the face of this there was the insidious alliance between financial elites and global bureaucrats (whether the IMF, World Bank, WTO, now EU, or what-have-you). </p> <p>When thousands of people begin assembling in squares in Greece and Spain calling for real democracy what they are effectively saying is: “Look, in 2008 you let the cat out of the bag. If money really is just a social construct now, a promise, a set of IOUs and even trillions of debts can be made to vanish if sufficiently powerful players demand it then,<span style="font-weight: bold;"> if democracy is to mean anything, it means that everyone gets to weigh in on the process of how th</span>ese promises are made and renegotiated.” I find this extraordinarily hopeful.</p>***
<br />
<br />Eventually, there will have to be recognition that in a phase of virtual money, safeguards have to be put in place – and not just ones to protect creditors. How many disasters it will take to get there? I can’t say. <p>
<br /></p></blockquote><p></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-55500172181506556832011-08-26T13:43:00.000-07:002011-08-26T11:31:23.517-07:00"Cyclical Climatic Changes DOUBLE The Risk Of Civil Wars, With Analysis Showing That 50 Of 250 Conflicts Between 1950 And 2004 Were Triggered By The El Niño Cycle"<p>
<br /></p><p>The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/aug/24/el-nino-cycle-deadly-conflict">notes</a>:</p><p></p><blockquote><p>Cyclical climatic changes double the risk of civil wars, with analysis showing that 50 of 250 conflicts between 1950 and 2004 were triggered by the El Niño cycle, according to scientists.</p><p>Researchers connected the climate phenomenon known as El Niño, which brings hot and dry conditions to tropical nations and cuts food production, to outbreaks of violence in countries from southern Sudan to Indonesia and Peru.</p><p>Solomon Hsiang, who led the research at Columbia University, New York, said: "We can speculate that a long-ago Egyptian dynasty was overthrown during a drought. This study shows a systematic pattern of global climate affecting conflict right now. We are still dependent on climate to a very large extent."</p><p>Hsiang said that pre-emptive action could prevent bloodshed because El Niño events could be predicted up to two years ahead. "We hope our study may help reduce humanitarian suffering."</p><p>***</p><p>The scientists are beginning work to discover the factors involved in the climate-conflict link. Food is likely to be key as crop yields and incomes from agriculture are known to fall heavily in El Niño years. "When crops fail, people may take up a gun to make a living," said Hsiang.</p><p>Other factors could include rises in unemployment and natural disasters, such as hurricanes. "Also, previous work has shown that when people get warm and uncomfortable, they are more prone to fight," said Cane.</p><p>***</p><p>Marshall Burke, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, said the research gave very convincing evidence of a connection.Andrew Solow, an environmental statistician, at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, said: "Careful statistical analyses such as this one, which relate complex human behaviour to environmental factors, can be invaluable."</p></blockquote><p></p><p>And - in keeping with my recent slew of reports on the sun's effect on the Earth - <a href="http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011GL047964.shtml">solar activity may play a substantial role in El Nino conditions</a>.</p><p><span style="font-style: italic;">On a related note, central bank policies have </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/01/quantitative-easing-is-causing-food.html">caused food prices to rise</a><span style="font-style: italic;">, leading to </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/maps-du-jour-food-inflation-riots-and-the-libyan-politics-2011-8">riots around the world</a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span>
<br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53246864840716464.post-18574502390870987072011-08-26T10:15:00.001-07:002011-08-26T11:16:49.915-07:00Today's Weather Report ... For The Sun<p>
<br /></p><p>The activity of the sun affects <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/scientific-experiment-shows-that-cosmic.html">weather and climate</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/next-scientific-frontier-sun-earth.html">many other conditions</a> on Earth ... including, perhaps, <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/does-solar-activity-influence.html">earthquakes and volcanic activity</a>, and <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/08/cyclical-climatic-changes-double-risk.html">maybe even civil wars</a>. (And yes, a big solar storm can <a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/when-this-happens-every-nuclear-power.html">take down electric grids and electronic equipment for many months</a>).</p><p>So the following solar weather widget from the National Weather Service's <a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/">Space Weather Prediction Center</a> is interesting:
<br /></p><p></p><h2 class="widgettitle">Solar Wind Activity Status:</h2><div style="text-align: center;"><img alt="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/sw_dials.gif" src="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/sw_dials.gif" />
<br />
<br /><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Further details </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/">here</a> <span style="font-style: italic;">and </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.spaceweather.com/">here</a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span>
<br />
<br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Note: You can simply copy and paste the widget. It is a .gif image which is updated daily without your having to do anything.</span>
<br /></div></div><p>
<br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0