The allegations about the anthrax suspect and his interaction with mental health professionals raise several questions:
- Why would a top bioterror expert go to a fresh-out-of-school sociologist, a group addiction counselor, as opposed to an experience psychiatrist or psychologist? Why would he talk about homicidal tendencies in a group counseling session, as opposed to a private session?
- How could someone committed to a mental institution on the basis that he was a likely mass murderer and a danger to himself and others simply "sign himself out" of the mental institution?
- Why was a newly certified group addiction counselor who herself has a history of battery, drugs, DUIs and bankruptcies fully briefed on one of the most sensitive criminal investigations in history?
- If he really did confess to homicidal tendencies, why would mental health professionals wait 8 days after he signed himself out of the psych ward before obtaining a restraining order against him or re-committing him to the psych hospital (this guy was a top a bioweapons expert and supposedly a homicidal maniac, so he could easily murder the group counselor and others)?
It is possible that Ivins is, in fact, the anthrax killer. The FBI needs to present its full case to the public before that can be determined once and for all. But the evidence presented so far by the FBI is not very impressive.
Update: FBI agents strongly suggested to the social worker that she file court papers to obtain a restraining order against the anthrax suspect (it wasn't even her own idea).
No comments:
Post a Comment
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.