Sunday, April 5, 2009

Scientists Publish 3 Papers Raising Evidence Contradicting the Official Story of 9/11


You have probably heard that scientists have found "super-thermite" in the debris of the World Trade Centers (original scientific article).

In fact, two previous scientific papers have also found evidence contradicting the official story about 9/11:

Indeed, numerous world-class scientists have found evidence contradicting the official story.

If you don't buy the scientists' arguments, that's fine. You can instead look at what the following highly-credible experts say about 9/11:

at

3 comments:

  1. UnknownApril 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM

    You can't get past the first 30 minutes of the high jacking without knowing something was amiss. Too many procedures were violated that we have seen put into action before. Remember the golfer and the Gulfsteam that 3 minutes after they lost contact interceptors were in the air and armed. Just for drill where is the air traffic control tape that went missing end up. Too many questions unasked and unanswered for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mostly MagicApril 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM

    Cheney succeeded with 9/11, watch for him to strike again, worked so well for his crowd the first time...

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousApril 6, 2009 at 7:22 AM

    The official 9-11 story is full of lies, just like everything else they say. Our government is corrupt from top to bottom, just as our Founders warned it would be. And everyone who played the stupid RedTeam-BlueTeam game -- going against the warnings of George Washington as he left office -- is mostly to blame.

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.