The Fed's "Independence" Argument is False → Washingtons Blog
The Fed's "Independence" Argument is False - Washingtons Blog

Friday, July 10, 2009

The Fed's "Independence" Argument is False

The Fed's main argument against an audit by Congress is that it would interfere with the Fed's "independence".

For example, in his Congressional testimony yesterday - entitled "Federal Reserve independence" - the vice chair of the Fed used the "i" word 30 times.

What Does Fed Independence Mean?

The Fed is pretending that it is merely trying to insulate itself from political pressure, and that politician's re-election concerns should not interfere with sound "monetary policy".

That sounds good, doesn't it?

But it is a red herring.

Congress is elected by the people, and the people can throw the bums out if they don't listen to the people's demands. So even though most congress members are political hacks, they are subject to at least some accountability.

The Fed, on the other hand, is subject to no accountability. The Fed is refusing to provide Congress any information on where the trillions of dollars it has handed out have gone. The Fed is also refusing to disclose what toxic assets it has taken from the banks and put om its own books.

And there are a few congress people who actually have the best people's interests in mind, and want to hold the Fed accountable - on behalf of the people.

What the Fed is really arguing is that it should not have to answer to the American people.

Because if the American people knew what the Fed was really doing, they would demand that it be terminated immediately.

What is the Fed Hiding?

Remember, As the Fed itself admits, the Federal Reserve Banks are private organizations owned and controlled by their private member banks.

According to many PhD economists (such as Marc Faber), the Fed caused this economic crisis, as well as the Great Depression.

The Fed has also replaced assets with some real value with toxic derivatives on its balance sheet, in order to act as a giant garbage disposal for the big-stakes gamblers at the giant banks.

And the Fed makes trillions of dollars in profits for its member banks by creating credit which the U.S. government has every right under the Constitution to create itself. In other words, the Fed's member banks get trillions in interest charges from the U.S. government and the taxpayer which would not be incurred if the government created the credit and money itself.

The Fed has also violated the Federal Reserve Act and other laws. In what ways? Well, I can guess at probably 10 or more categories of unlawful activity off the top of my head.

But we'll have to await a real audit to get the full list.


  1. Outstanding analysis, George! BTW, thank you for the work you've done for the public benefit for years.

    The cost-benefit analysis of replacing the Fed with government-issued money for the direct payment of taxes for public goods and services is about a trillion dollars of public benefit a year. For details, read "The Heart of Economics" at my link. This paper has 13 pages of revealing, and sourced, historic quotes on the long battle in this country over who will control the power to create money. The link includes a one-page summary; any work on that page you are welcome to use.

  2. Even if the independence-argument would be valid, it does not justify the fact that 100% of all federal income tax of all citizens flows to the shareholders of the FED as interest over the national debt. Keep in mind. If you don't pay it, the IRS comes into your house arresting and threatening you with violence if you resist. Once arrested you'll be tried and sent to jail. For example Wesley Snipes is currently doing time for it.

    How else can one define that other than feudal slavery? It's basically involuntary serfdom.


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.