Thursday, November 12, 2009

Barrick Confirms that We Have Peak Gold

As I pointed out in September, there are strong arguments that we have "peak gold" - in other words, that the relatively easy-to-reach gold supplies are gone, and so supplies are getting more and more expensive to locate and extract.

Now, the world's biggest gold producer - Barrick - is saying the same thing:

Aaron Regent, president of the Canadian gold giant [Barrick], said that global output has been falling by roughly 1m ounces a year since the start of the decade. Total mine supply has dropped by 10pc as ore quality erodes, implying that the roaring bull market of the last eight years may have further to run.

"There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold'," he told The Daily Telegraph at the RBC's annual gold conference in London.

"Production peaked around 2000 and it has been in decline ever since, and we forecast that decline to continue. It is increasingly difficult to find ore," he said.

For a thorough big picture analysis on gold, see this.



3 comments:

  1. Can anyone speak to any available evidence that indicates the amount of people leveraged into gold.
    As the popularity of this asset class takes off it would follow that sections of the investment community would purchase gold on credit. They've done it with every other asset class so why would gold be different?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unlike oil, there are no alternatives for gold.

    I will research this, but if credible, then it indicates a very sharp spike for gold.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If true then they can easily manipulate the market by claiming peak gold then reducing output. brilliant.

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.