Economist: Health Care Bill "Is Just Another Bailout Of The Financial System" → Washingtons Blog
Economist: Health Care Bill "Is Just Another Bailout Of The Financial System" - Washingtons Blog

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Economist: Health Care Bill "Is Just Another Bailout Of The Financial System"


It is obvious that many republicans oppose the proposed health care bill. But many liberals and progressives oppose it as well.

For example, economist L. Randall Wray writes:

Here’s the opportunity, Wall Street’s newest and bestest gamble: there is a huge untapped market of some 50 million people who are not paying insurance premiums—and the number grows every year because employers drop coverage and people can’t afford premiums. Solution? Health insurance “reform” that requires everyone to turn over their pay to Wall Street. Can’t afford the premiums? That is OK—Uncle Sam will kick in a few hundred billion to help out the insurers. Of course, do not expect more health care or better health outcomes because that has nothing to do with “reform” ... Wall Street’s insurers... see a missed opportunity. They’ll collect the extra premiums and deny the claims. This is just another bailout of the financial system, because the tens of trillions of dollars already committed are not nearly enough.

Wray points out that - with the repeal of Glass Steagall - the financial sector and the insurance businesses (the "f" and "i" in the "fire" sector) are somewhat merged.

Wray is no conservative. He is Ph.D. is Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Research Director with the Center for Full Employment and Price Stability and Senior Research Scholar at The Levy Economics Institute - which focuses on inequality in the distribution of earnings, income, and wealth.

Dr. Andrew Coates describes the bill as "a guarantee of insurance industry dominance and the continued privatization of health care in every arena.”

Dr. Coates is no conservative. He is a medical doctor, a member of the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO, secretary of the Capital District chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program, and teaches at Albany Medical College.

And - as I have previously pointed out - progressives such as law school professor Sheldon Laskin, anti-war activist David Swanson, and Miles Mogulescu are calling the bill authoritarian and unconstitutional because the government cannot legally force people to buy private health insurance.

Indeed, given Wray's point that this is just another bailout in disguise, the bill should more properly be called a "wealth reform" bill than health reform legislation.

3 comments:

  1. Washington's Blog--My Safari homepage. Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write in my site something like that. Can I take part of your post to my blog? Please come visit my site Jacksonville Business Services And Classifieds when you got time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Once the government forces Americans to buy healthcare at about $3,000 per year/person...assuming the average adult American lives at least 50 years, that's...$150,000 times 50 million (people) in legally guaranteed taxable revenues that our government can use as collateral to get into even greater debt...or if we're "lucky" get out of debt?

    Combine this with the 25% increase in stock market (taxable) capital gains that will come with the influx of QE2 (new) monies, and Obama looks like a super hero to all those people who profit. But alas, short term gains when Americans realize everything costs more (perhaps they'll add a VAT?) and the Chinese are buying up our natural resources like...food.

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.