Thursday, July 15, 2010
Initial Results from Well Integrity Test Are Inconclusive
As Coast Guard admiral Thad Allen has explained, sustained pressure readings above 8,000 pounds per square inch (psi) would show that the wellbore is more or less intact, while pressures of 6,000 psi or less would mean there could be major problems:
We are looking for somewhere between 8,000 and 9,000 PSI inside the capping stack, which would indicate to us that the hydrocarbons are being forced up and the wellbores are being able to withstand that pressure. And that is good news.
If we are down around in the 4,000 to 5,000, 6,000 range that could potentially tell us that the hydrocarbons are being diverted someplace else, and we would have to try and assess the implications of that. And as you might imagine, there are gradations as you go up from 4,000 or 5,000 PSI up to 8,000 or 9,000. …
We will at some point try to get to 8,000 or 9,000 and sustain that for some period of time, and these will be done basically, as I said — if we have a very low pressure reading, we will try and need (ph) at least six hours of those readings to try to ensure that that is the reading. If it’s a little higher, we want to go for 24 hours. And if it’s up at 8,000 or 9,000, we would like to go 48 hours just to make sure it can sustain those pressures for that amount of time.
The former director of Sandia National Laboratories says the pressure readings so far have been ambiguous.
As the Washington Post points out:
We will need to wait another 24 hours or so - and engineers will have to continue monitoring sonar and visual images (both help determine if any oil is leaking from the seafloor), and seismic data (to determine if there are any new leaks below the seafloor) - before engineers can determine how stable the well is.The initial pressure readings are in an ambiguous range, and officials will have to make a difficult judgment call on whether to keep the well shut in or reopen it, according to Tom Hunter, retired director of the Sandia National Laboratories and a member of the federal government's scientific team overseeing the test.
"If it were a lot higher, it would be an easier decision to make," Hunter said.
***
Hunter, who witnessed the test from BP's war room in Houston, told The Washington Post that the pressure rose to about 6,700 psi and appeared likely to level out "closer to 7,000." He said one possibility is that the reservoir has lost pressure as it has depleted itself the past three months.
"It's just premature to tell. We just don't know whether something is leaking or not," Hunter said.
Update: This was confirmed by BP's Kent Wells in his July 16th morning press conference.
3 comments:
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.
Thanks for keeping us updated.
ReplyDeleteTest.plz ignore.
ReplyDeleteTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OBSERVATIONS:
ReplyDeleteWhy wasn't a flow rate done before the well was closed off after the cap was installed?
We had too much "guestimates" of the flowrate when the well was "blowing out" over the last 88 days!!
After the current closed-in / build up pressure analysis is completed, the well should be opened up for a pressure drawdown analysis.(rates and reservoir pressure can be determined).
If there is no leak at the last casing shoe,
the well can be opened to flow,until the relief well encounters the casing of the "blowout-well".
PS: I have suggestions for the relief well to enter the casing of the "blowout-well", based on an actual offshore experience during my drilling career in TRINIDAD.
For any one reading this and can facilitate a communication to the BP Technical staff or an official of the Obama Administration,
I hereby offer my services, and I can be contacted at:
FRAMJOHN@GMAIL.COM
1 868 763 1361
1 868 677 7308
---------------------
FAIZUL RAMJOHN
BSPE (1976)
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA
PETROLEUM/DRILLING CONSULTANT
BLOWOUT ANALYST