It is Spring 2009.
Just as many people have warned, a series of attacks using nuclear "dirty bombs" kills thousands of Americans.
Government intelligence agencies point to Iran, China and Russia as the source of the attacks.
The president and Congress set in motion plans for war against the 3 giants. A war which will undoubtedly cost tens of trillions of dollars, kill thousands of Americans, and cause untold misery for years to come.
Of course you would.
Well, then you would also want to know whether Bin Laden was really behind 9/11, whether rogue elements within the U.S. allowed the attacks to succeed, or whether it was actually an "inside job".
Think about it. If, like Howard Zinn, you say "I don't care if 9/11 is an inside job", you are really saying you don't care if future attacks are real attacks or false flag attacks intended to justify war against a concocted enemy.
Is that what you're saying?
In addition, false flag attacks - being aided and abetted by rogue elements within the government - can easily be prevented . . . just don't aid and abet, and the attack won't happen, or at least won't succeed. So thousands of American lives can be spared if the topic of false flag terrorism is investigated and understood.
Fantasy situations like this are a waste of your page yo!
ReplyDeleteAnd besides that, what are the odds of this really?? nil.
The immediate crisis Bidean and others keep saying Obama will face upon taking office is painfully obvious: the economy.
I see this logic as applicable not only to terrorist attacks, but politics in general. If we fail to ask why something bad happened, or who is to blame for it (i.e., the economic collapse, torture, ineffective government) then we are condemned to repeat it.
ReplyDeleteThe economy is a classic example. No one is really dealing with the question of how we got into this mess and who was responsible. Obama is listening to economic advisers who failed to predict the housing bubble, or who supported the derivatives market, or who championed the removal of regulations. If we had investigated and understood this crisis, those individuals would be anathema to a President who advocated change.
You see, all have eyes so wide open on the economy issue that even comments on a false flag question issue are bent straight to an economic resolve question.
ReplyDeleteSo, about the false flag question - even a blatant proof will find its interpretation way to mere corruption.
WTC 1993 bombing: Emad Salem, the Confedential Informant, it says everything but the majority, through the magics of interpretation,
will reason their way out of the "inside job" - even if it's all in their face.
The complete taped conversation between the FBI confidential informant and agent: http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/SalemWBAI.mp3
About Emad Salem - the FBI confidential informant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emad_Salem
About 'interpretation' of the WTC 1993 bombing as whether or not being an "inside job" :
http://freethoughtmanifesto.blogspot.com/2007/03/fbi-behind-wtc-bombing-1993.html
===
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat I'm saying is that people will choose the comfort to interpret the 1993 bombing issue and taped conversation that Emad Salem was handling in his own interest so he could blackmail the government to pay him high money.
ReplyDeleteThat, instead of listening to what the witness is saying that he handled while the New York District Attorney and FBI were uodated about the everyday follow up actions and fabrication of the bomb prior to the 1993 bombing, an inside job face value.
So Yo! diykozmonot :) not really a fantasy when it's already well documented.
ReplyDeleteYeah, and what happened last time there was a worldwide economic downturn...Oh yeah, we had that little conflict WW 2
ReplyDeletei'm not saying anything negative about false flags, i think they're commonplace. and sure it applies to the economic failure.
ReplyDeleteno need to speculate what the nightmare scenario will be....waste of space because it could literally be anything imaginable.