I'm passing on verbatim another excellent roundup on the foreclosure issue emailed to me by a friend on the Hill. He's much better informed on the issue than I am.
Rep. Alan Grayson is sending the following letter to Secretary Geithner and the other members of the new Financial Stability Oversight Council (FDIC, OCC, NCUA, SEC, CFTC, and the Federal Reserve). He is calling for a foreclosure freeze pending an investigation into the systemic implications of foreclosure fraud. There are trillions of dollars of mortgage backed securities out there in legal limbo; this is more than just a few technical problems with affidavits.
Naked Capitalism analyzes the letter and the implications: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/10/dc-waking-up-to-escalating-foreclosure-train-wreck-grayson-calls-for-fsoc-to-examine-foreclosure-fraud-as-systemic-risk.html
Mortgage Investors Call for Trustees to Probe Foreclosure Items:
Dylan Ratigan Did a Segment on Foreclosure Fraud Yesterday:
October 7, 2010
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner The Honorable Sheila Bair
Department of the Treasury Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20220 Washington, DC 20429
The Honorable Ben S. Bernanke The Honorable Mary Schapiro
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Securities and Exchange Commission
20th Street and Constitution Ave, NW 100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20551 Washington, DC 20549
The Honorable John G. Walsh The Honorable Gary Gensler
Acting Comptroller of the Currency Chairman
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Commodity Futures Trading Commission
250 E St. SW 1155 21st St. NW
Washington, DC 20219 Washington, DC 20581
The Honorable Ed DeMarco The Honorable Debbie Matz
Acting Director Chairman
Federal Housing Finance Agency National Credit Union Administration
1700 G Street, NW 1775 Duke Street,
Washington, DC 20552 Alexandria, VA 22314-3428
Dear Secretary Geithner and members of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC),
The FSOC is tasked with ensuring the financial stability of the United States, which includes identifying and addressing possible systemic risks. There is a well-documented wave of foreclosure fraud sweeping the country that presents such a risk. Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase have both suspended foreclosures in 23 states where that fraud could be uncovered and stopped by the courts. Connecticut has suspended foreclosures.
I write to encourage the FSOC to appoint an emergency task force on foreclosure fraud as a potential systemic risk. I am also writing to ask the members of the FSOC to use their regulatory authority to impose a foreclosure moratorium on all mortgages originated and securitized between 2005-2008, until this task force is able to understand and mitigate the systemic risk posed by the foreclosure fraud crisis.
So far, banks are claiming that the many forged documents uncovered by courts and attorneys represent a simple 'technical problem' with foreclosure processes. This is not true. What is happening is fraud to cover up fraud.
The mortgage lending boom saw the proliferation of predatory lending and mortgage fraud, what the FBI called at the time 'an epidemic of mortgage fraud.' Much of this was lender-induced.
When lenders - many of whom are now out of business - originally lent money to borrowers, they often did so knowing that the terms of the loans could not possibly be honored. They sought fees, not repayment. These lenders put people in predatory loans, they induced massive amounts of fraud, and Wall Street banks misrepresented these loans to investors when they moved through the securitization chain. They were stealing money from investors, and from homeowners.
Obviously these originators and servicers didn't keep good records of who owed what to whom because the point was never about getting paid back, it was about moving as much loan volume as possible as quickly and as cheaply as possible. The banks didn't keep good records, and there is good reason to believe in many if not virtually all cases during this period, failed to transfer the notes, which is the borrower IOUs in accordance with the requirements of their own pooling and servicing agreements. As a result, the notes may be put out of eligibility for the trust under New York law, which governs these securitizations. Potential cures for the note may, according to certain legal experts, be contrary to IRS rules governing REMICs. As a result, loan servicers and trusts simply lack standing to foreclose. The remedy has been foreclosure fraud, including the widespread fabrication of documents.
There are now trillions of dollars of securitizations of these loans in the hands of investors. The trusts holding these loans are in a legal gray area, as the mortgage titles were never officially transferred to the trusts. The result of this is foreclosure fraud on a massive scale, including foreclosures on people without mortgages or who are on time with their payments.
The liability here for the major banks is potentially enormous, and can lead to a systemic risk. Fortunately, the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation includes a resolution process for these banks. More importantly, these foreclosures are devastating neighborhoods, families, and cities all over the country. Each foreclosure costs tens of thousands of dollars to a municipality, lowers property values, and makes bank failures more likely.
I appreciate your willingness to assess possible systemic risks to the country, and would again encourage you to suspend foreclosures until this problem is understood and its ramifications dealt with.
Member of Congress
Post a Comment
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.