Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Storms Knock Out 3 Nuclear Reactors in Alabama ... No Leak, But a Reminder of Nuclear Vulnerability
Reuters reports:
Severe storms and tornadoes moving through the U.S. Southeast dealt a severe blow to the Tennessee Valley Authority on Wednesday, causing three nuclear reactors in Alabama to shut and knocking out 11 high-voltage power lines, the utility and regulators said.
***All three units at TVA's 3,274-megawatt Browns Ferry nuclear plant in Alabama tripped about 5:30 EDT (2230 GMT) after losing outside power to the plant, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said.
A TVA spokeswoman said the station's backup power systems, including diesel generators, started and operated as designed. External power was restored quickly to the plant but diesel generators remained running Wednesday evening, she said.
The Browns Ferry units are among 23 U.S. reactors that are similar in design to the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan where backup generators were swept away in the tsunami that followed the massive earthquake on March 11.
The News-Courrier reported on April 12th that - like the Japanese reactors - the Alabama reactors shut down by tornadoes store a lot of radioactive spent fuel rods in an unprotected fashion:
At Browns Ferry, a plant with the same design as Fukushima-Dai-ichi in Japan, more than 1,415 metric tons of spent fuel and rods lie in three pools on a massive concrete pad above the plant’s three reactors.
All that encloses the pools is a heavy garage like metal roof and walls.
In contrast, reports on the amount of fresh and spent fuel together at all 6 Fukushima reactors is somewhere between 1,760 and 4,277 metric tons. In other words, when the fuel within the reactors is included, Browns Ferry may have almost as much radioactive fuel in its 3 reactors as are contained in all Fukushima's 6 reactors.
Moreover, the Browns Ferry plants are only built to withstand a 6.0 earthquake, even though the nearby New Madrid Fault could potentially cause a bigger earthquake. As the Huntsville Times wrote in a recent editorial:
Browns Ferry is built along the New Madrid fault and thus designed to withstand some degree of an earthquake. A tornado or a ravaging flood could just as easily be like the tsunami that unleashed the final blow.
Energy officials should re-evaluate nuclear plant designs and build in plenty of redundancies for worst-case scenarios.
Moreover, as Reuters noted recently:
Internal Nuclear Regulatory Commission e-mails and memos obtained by the Union of Concerned Scientists questioned the adequacy of the back-up plans to keep reactor cooling systems running if off-site power were lost for an extended period.
***
"While the NRC and the nuclear industry have been reassuring Americans that there is nothing to worry about -- that we can do a better job dealing with a nuclear disaster like the one that just happened in Japan -- it turns out that privately NRC senior analysts are not so sure" ....And Browns Ferry almost melted down in 1975.
Thankfully, there haven't been any reports of radiation leakage, and - since the diesel generators are working - there shouldn't be any problems in the near future.
But this is yet another reminder that many nuclear power plants are built with outdated designs and maintained in an unsafe, penny-pinching manner, and are very vulnerable to natural disasters or mischief.
Will we allow a nuclear black swan to happen in America ... which could be even worse than Japan?
Or will we be smart enough to tackle this problem now, while we still can?
4 comments:
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.
Posts
What if there was a direct hit on a reactor from a bad tornado? What would happen? They must be built with that possibility in mind -- aren't they? But what if incentives like those identified in your earlier posts, drawing comparisons to financial market regulations, are operating?
ReplyDelete23 U.S. reactors that are similar in design to the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan where backup generators were swept away
ReplyDeleteJct: Relax. They were all built by the contractors who were best at cutting corners to be the lowest bidders. Always done on the cheap because the Rothschild needed the interest on their loans paid first.
The French reprocess their spent fuel rods at an additional cost to the consumer of 6%. GE doesn't see this as a small price to pay to ensure public safety as do the French, but rather as a major annual component of return to the nuclear utilities if the spent fuel problem is kicked down the road.
ReplyDeleteJimmy Carter's anti-proliferation based 1979 de-funding of the US reprocessing plan is the cause of the 30 year build up of spent fuel pools in the US and indirectly the cause of GE-designed SFP accumulations in Fukushima and other locations.
It is sad what happened to the state of Alabama. It is a reminder that what happened in Japan is close to home.
ReplyDelete