Wednesday, July 8, 2009
No One Could Have Planted Bombs in the World Trade Center Without Being Detected, Could They?
As Raw Story notes:
A Government Accountability Office investigator smuggled live bomb components into a federal building in just 27 seconds, then assembled a bomb in a restroom and ventured throughout the building without being detected, a leaked tape revealed Wednesday.
In addition, congressional investigators were able to penetrate every single federal building they probed without any difficulty — 10 in all.
And see this.
Indeed, as I wrote in 2005, there is substantial additional evidence that bombs could have been planted in the World Trade Center without anyone knowing:
- Bomb-sniffing dogs were inexplicably removed from the Twin Towers five days before 9-11
- The Twin Towers had been evacuated a number of times in the weeks preceding 9/11
- Workers in the Twin Towers observed heavy work taking place on supposedly empty floors in the weeks before 9-11; supposedly, the work took place on floors the elevators would not stop on without a special access key (toward the end of the video).
- Bombs could have been placed during renovation of the elevators in the Twin Towers.
- And -- as an interesting coincidence -- a Bush-linked company ran security at the trade centers, thus giving it free reign to the buildings
These are just a few of the known, public examples of opportunities to plant bombs. There were undoubtedly many additional opportunities available to skilled operatives. (Remember that tightrope walker Philippe Petit snuck into the World Trade Center with a friend in 1974 with massive amounts of equipment, smuggled the equipment to the top floor and rigged up a highwire for his tightrope walking stunt without being detected). See also this video.
As with all of the other arguments trying to debunk those who question the government's version of 9/11, the argument that bombs couldn't have been planted without people observing it is incorrect.
The people still defending the government's version of 9/11 have simply not spent the time to look at the facts.
18 comments:
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.
Posts
many, if not most of the 'true believers' would give up their lives before ever ceding this argument.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post!!!
ReplyDeleteand remember that wacky french acrobats made it into wtc in 1974, brought massive amounts of materials to the top floor & rigged up a highwire for a tightrope walking stunt... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_On_Wire
ReplyDeletethanks for all yr great work, brother!
I think the bigger story here is that our would-be masters are vulnerable. Fear them not...
ReplyDeleteHowabout-The Bush family arranging the Mortgage and Insurance policy for Silverstein? And worse--the Insurance company paid $billions without a wimper :^/
ReplyDeleteTimes are changing. I know a couple of die hard Republicans that are finally begininning to question the official story. Why? Because they see what is going on with the bank bailout and no longer have any faith in the US government or its representatives.
ReplyDeleteWe can't underestimte the importance of this. This weak security was discovered AFTER 9/11 in a hyper security world where everyone and everything is tracked, traced, inspected, and locked down much more tightly. If this breach in security was so easily achieved in this paranoid environment, imagine how easy it would have been to infiltrate the WTC and plant explosives in the weeks and months preceding 9/11 when security was nowhere near as tight as it is now.
ReplyDeleteThe Port Authority closed out the 1990s with a stream of press releases announcing the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade center office space to "cutting edge" firms like sum micro-systems. Yet around the complex a million square feet stood empty, and the buidings originally intended as great catalyzing chambers of world trade were, by degrees, transforming into a kind of disjunctive real estate layer-cake.
ReplyDeleteOne story above the carpeted, wood-paneled offices of a japanese securities firm, a group of "artist" filled bare walls with boldly colored images and hung sculptures from the exposed ceiling girders of a vast echoing cavern.
As part of a Lower Manhattan Cultural Council program that turned some of the vacant space in the towers over to "artist" rent-free, 40,000 square feet of concrete floor lay paint splattered and strewn with the raw materials of a creative urge that has never been easily reconciled with the imperatives of a bottom line.
Page 191
Divided We Stand
Eric Darton (1999)
(Paul Isaac NYsentinel)
Michael Jackson!
ReplyDeleteJesus Christ, the fact that there are people who still believe the official conspiracy theory is reason enough to blow up the entire public school system. Oh, and then there are those "moon landings" . . .
ReplyDeleteGood job! You wrote about this sort of scenario a few years back and I questioned the feasibility of hauling and placing the necessary quantities. I've always had some trouble with that angle, but no longer. You might also examine the illegal art prank described in the book "the b-thing": http://youtube.com/watch?v=IFCABhsWUT4
ReplyDeletehttp://archive.org/web/*/http://wtc.window.to
http://positiontoknow.com/S-11/html/b-thing
Emergency Evacutions Drills were conducted by the Port Authority
ReplyDeleteon 911 The Towers were running under silverstein properties management
(Paul Isaac NYsentinel)
I notice this article was originally posted on WRH then it got removed after I made the initial posting here.
ReplyDeleteThis seems to be a consistant patter with MR-WRH.
This is obvious sign of controlled "truth movement"
marginalization of truth
" I learn then that the chief has been clearing the area in anticipation of the collapse of the fourty-seven stories of #7 WTC."
ReplyDelete"Suddenly, several hundred firefighters are milling about, and when the order is given we all are moved back another few hundred feet from the corner of vessey and west. "
Page 175
Report From Ground Zero (Dennis Smith)
"All of a sudden the fourty-Seven story building before us begins to shake.
"Its coming down" someone yells, and everyone gets poised to run in the opposite direction. I head with a small group into the bagel shop at the uptown side of the street, but I am watching the building as it begins to crumble. It falls almost as if in slow motion, sinking strait down, and then leans to thesouth,
living most of its rubble against the north wall of building 6...
...The regality of this high building is transformed in a few seconds to mere rubble. And I now fear that has fallen on those we seek. I waite for the dark cloud of concrete dust to hurtling toward us, but it rolls in the other direction,
toward the north east. "
page 176
Report From Group Zero (Dennis Smith)
"With 7 WTC down, the army of construction workers, police officers, emts, and firefighters begins to work. People who have never met begin working side by side as if they have practiced for months."
page 177
Report From Ground Zero ( Dennis Smith)
"My biggest concern at that time was #7. It was burning, and I felt that was a danger to the rescuers and to any trapped survivors there might be. We decided to keep the command post back on Chambers and to keeps all but our necessary people out....
ReplyDeleteWe were all pretty much on board that tower 7 was going to fall. We just didnt know when and which direction. Everybody forgets about 7, but that building was
fourty-seven stories, and that in itself would have been a ver major event. We couldnt fight the fire in tower 7 because we didnt have enough water. All the water mains were down. What water we had was being supplied by the boats, through large- diameter hose. It would have been a chaotic situation, in any event, trying to get in there under those circumstances and fight that fire. The building did go down eventually, all fourty-seven floors, about 5 o'clock....
When the building came down it was completly involved in fire, all fourty-seven stories. The rush of heat and burning papers landed under the cars and [set thirty or fourty of them on fire]."
Assistant Chief of Department Harry Meyers
Page 161 Report From Ground Zero (Dennis Smith)
"On Grenwich I saw, a few Battalion Chiefs coming up on the side streets. I told them to get some lines stretched in and to start to put out some of the car fires before the tanks started going. I told them to keep the guys back and not to treat. Them like car fires [but] like BOMBS."
page 161 Assistant Chief of Department Harry Meyers
Report From Ground Zero
(Paul Isaac NYsentinel)
What idiot ever said you couldn't get explosives into an office building? Just put them into copier paper boxes and there you go.
ReplyDeleteThe WTC elevators probably lifted several tons of copier paper daily. Who was going to check all that? Every day for how many years since the first bombing?
People who lack imagination should NOT go into security. Or government.
Fishing around for my own evidence --- as in, something others haven’t mentioned which clinches the question, “What happened on 911?” --- I found, in July 2003, an article in the mainstream Spanish press which did it for me.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn’t published because the journalists had been doing some research, it was published because a reader of the newspaper had been looking carefully at some videos and, in particular, an award-winning photo by a wandering photographer called Carmen Taylor. This reader noticed something anomalous, blew up the pictures and had them professionally examined, on the newspaper’s insistence on having air-tight, uncontrovertible evidence. I might add that it was only due to an outraged rebellion on the newsroom floor that permission for publication was granted.
The digital analysis, by a huge computer program designed to “see” and compute 3D objects, conclusively (100%) shows that a 3D object was attached to the underbelly of one of the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers.
When Boeing was contacted for comment, after several days to examine the research, they would only say they couldn’t comment “for reasons of national security”. Where have we heard that before?
Much fluff and shilling has led to this bit of research being rejected as a “no planes theory” or the result of “pod people”, but only a truly dangerous tidbit of information would receive this amount of attention from professional “rubbishers”. It only goes to prove how scared they are that this evidence might get a broader audience.
Does anyone remember the famous sixties film “Blowup” by director Michelangelo Antonioni? It was a casual photograph of a crime scene unwittingly taken by a professional photographer, played by David Bailey. By blowing up the photos the crime was discovered and the perpetrator caught.
This story of a Boeing 767, whose physical characteristics, in addition do not correspond with the B-767-222, registration N612UA, aircraft that allegedly crashed into the south tower, but an aircraft whose proportions do not tally, is similar to this film. Unwittingly, a photo (and supporting evidence from videos taken from different angles by different sources) has escaped into the mainstream, to the chagrin of the propagandists. It shows, undeniably, a large object attached to the fuselage. What it is I cannot say, I can only guess. What I do know is that passenger planes do not fly around the planet with large objects pinned to the bottom without pilots, groundstaff and passengers being aware of their presence.
Look into it. Read the story. Come to your own conclusions.
http://www.amics21.com/911/mysterious.html
http://www.amics21.com/911
Fishing around for my own evidence --- as in, something others haven’t mentioned which clinches the question, “What happened on 911?” --- I found, in July 2003, an article in the mainstream Spanish press which did it for me.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn’t published because the journalists had been doing some research, it was published because a reader of the newspaper had been looking carefully at some videos and, in particular, an award-winning photo by a wandering photographer called Carmen Taylor. This reader noticed something anomalous, blew up the pictures and had them professionally examined, on the newspaper’s insistence on having air-tight, uncontrovertible evidence. I might add that it was only due to an outraged rebellion on the newsroom floor that permission for publication was granted.
The digital analysis, by a huge computer program designed to “see” and compute 3D objects, conclusively (100%) shows that a 3D object was attached to the underbelly of one of the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers.
When Boeing was contacted for comment, after several days to examine the research, they would only say they couldn’t comment “for reasons of national security”. Where have we heard that before?
Much fluff and shilling has led to this bit of research being rejected as a “no planes theory” or the result of “pod people”, but only a truly dangerous tidbit of information would receive this amount of attention from professional “rubbishers”. It only goes to prove how scared they are that this evidence might get a broader audience.
Does anyone remember the famous sixties film “Blowup” by director Michelangelo Antonioni? It was a casual photograph of a crime scene unwittingly taken by a professional photographer, played by David Bailey. By blowing up the photos the crime was discovered and the perpetrator caught.
This story of a Boeing 767, whose physical characteristics, in addition do not correspond with the B-767-222, registration N612UA, aircraft that allegedly crashed into the south tower, but an aircraft whose proportions do not tally, is similar to this film. Unwittingly, a photo (and supporting evidence from videos taken from different angles by different sources) has escaped into the mainstream, to the chagrin of the propagandists. It shows, undeniably, a large object attached to the fuselage. What it is I cannot say, I can only guess. What I do know is that passenger planes do not fly around the planet with large objects pinned to the bottom without pilots, groundstaff and passengers being aware of their presence.
Look into it. Read the story. Come to your own conclusions.
http://www.amics21.com/911/mysterious.html
http://www.amics21.com/911