Tuesday, August 18, 2009
"It's Almost As If The Administration Is Opting for a Rose-Colored-Glasses PR Strategy" Instead of Looking at Reality and Adopting Appropriate Policy
Donald W. Riegle Jr. is a former Senator, serving as both a Democrat and a Republican. He was - for 5 years - chair of the Senate Banking Committee.
Riegle co-wrote an article today with the former CEO of AT&T Broadband and the international president of the United Steelworkers saying:
It's almost as if the administration is opting for a rose-colored-glasses PR strategy rather than taking a hard-nose look at actual consumer and employment figures and their trends, and modifying its economic policies accordingly.As I have repeatedly pointed out, psychologists say that - until government and business leaders prove they can behave responsibly, and until the perpetrators of financial fraud are held accountable - real trust will not be restored and the economy will not recover.
There was massive fraud between 2001 and 2007. Indeed, massive fraud is continuing today.
But Team Obama has not prosecuted any of the criminals (other than a few token bad guys, like Madoff). And the White House and Congress have not made any real changes. They haven't put the separation between investment and depository banking (Glass-Steagall) back in place, they haven't cracked down on naked credit default swaps or naked shorting, or done anything fundamental at all to ensure that another crash doesn't occur. See this, this, this and this.
Papering over fraud, propping up the same old system and turning up the volume on the happy-talk PR campaign will not work.
The economy cannot recover unless those who gamed the financial system are indicted, the real consumer, employment and other core numbers are discussed, and fundamental structural changes are made to the banking, credit rating, regulatory and financial systems.
3 comments:
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.
Posts
ALMOST AS IF?
ReplyDeletedon't forget that riegle was part of the Keating 5 along with mccain and should have gone to prison. just sayin'.
ReplyDeleteLet's talk about those employment figures. The definition the government uses underestimates the figure, as you point out with John William's site, "Shadow government statistics."
ReplyDeleteWith the lip-serviced goal of full employment, what nobody in government wants to say is that OBVIOUSLY if we're serious about achieving that goal, then whatever market failure we have for unemployment then government must create jobs to fill the gap for all who want employment.
I'm thinking $10/hour with health insurance for public infrastructure improvement using government-created money for pay. When the economy grows in proportion with the money supply, we eliminate inflation by definition. This is how Napoleon and Nazi Germany went from disaster to the world's leading economies within a few years. Of course, constructive jobs are the goal rather than moving toward taking over a continent.