Shiller: "Look up 'Bubble' in an Economic Textbook and It's Not There. [People] are Living in a 'Pretend-and-Extend' Environment" → Washingtons Blog
Shiller: "Look up 'Bubble' in an Economic Textbook and It's Not There. [People] are Living in a 'Pretend-and-Extend' Environment" - Washingtons Blog

Monday, October 19, 2009

Shiller: "Look up 'Bubble' in an Economic Textbook and It's Not There. [People] are Living in a 'Pretend-and-Extend' Environment"


Robert J. Shiller is one of the most prominent American economists and is one of the 100 most prominent economists in the world.

Shiller recently confirmed two points that alternative financial writers have been making for years:

(1) Mainstream economists don't pay any attention to bubbles - even though bubbles always burst, causing recessions or depressions

and

( 2) People are in an extend-and-pretend environment, trying to paper over the severity of economic problems and kick the can down the road
At the Buttonwood economics conference a couple of days ago, Shiller said:

"Look up 'bubble' in an economic textbook and it's not there." (Referring to the shortcomings of the traditional economic curriculum.).

People "are living in a 'pretend-and-extend' environment, waiting for the economy to recover." (Referring to the precarious state of the commercial real estate market and the wave of resets coming due between 2011 and 2013.)

While criticism of American economists' blind spot towards bubbles may be news to Americans, even BIS and the head of the World Bank have previously slammed the Federal Reserve for blowing bubbles and then trying to clean up the mess once they burst.

[Quotes and related parenthetical comments are both courtesy of Michael Panzer, who attended the conference].

2 comments:

  1. According to the curious assumptions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis and Rational Expectations Hypothesis that are needed for equilibrium modeling, gluts and bubbles do not arise endogenously in free markets. If something like this happens, it "must" be because of an exogenous "shock" to the economic system, which is otherwise self-regulating and ever in equilibrium due to endogenous market forces.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't most economists think the world is not strong form efficient?

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.