Given that The Neocons are Fascists, Is The Bailout A Form of "Financial Fascism"? → Washingtons Blog
Given that The Neocons are Fascists, Is The Bailout A Form of "Financial Fascism"? - Washingtons Blog

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Given that The Neocons are Fascists, Is The Bailout A Form of "Financial Fascism"?

Many commentators have called the Paulson bailout socialism for the wealthy. For example, former senior advisor to the U.S. Treasury and highly-regarded economics professor, Nouriel Roubini, says that Washington’s bail outs are “socialism for the rich, the well connected and Wall Street; it is . . . a corrupt system where profits are privatized and losses are socialized.”

But as leading journalist Robert Scheer notes, this is more like fascism than socialism:

What is proposed is not the nationalization of private corporations but rather a corporate takeover of government. The marriage of highly concentrated corporate power with an authoritarian state that services the politico-economic elite at the expense of the people is more accurately referred to as "financial fascism" [than socialism]. After all, even Hitler never nationalized the Mercedes-Benz company but rather entered into a very profitable partnership with the current car company's corporate ancestor, which made out quite well until Hitler's bubble burst.
Indeed, historian Gaetano Salvemini argued in 1936 that fascism makes taxpayers responsible to private enterprise, because "the State pays for the blunders of private enterprise... Profit is private and individual. Loss is public and social" (page 416). This perfectly mirrors Roubini's statement about the current bailout plan.

Remember that one of the best definitions of fascism is the "merger of state and corporate power". And remember that a significant agenda of fascists is to ensure loyalty from their nation's corporations.

As an article on Wikipedia states:

In general, apart from the nationalizations of some industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state.

***
Fascist governments encouraged the pursuit of private profit and offered many benefits to large businesses, but they demanded in return that all economic activity should serve the "national interest".

Sound familiar?

5 comments:

  1. Thanks for the providing good information.I will also suggest to consider buying an auto insurance for your car as it has become inevitable to buy auto insurance these days. I found a good place that helped me find an incredible rate http://www.carinsuranceassistant.com/index.php?id=New+Car

    they give you the best rates from lots of local providers

    ReplyDelete
  2. welcome to the wow gold, cheap WoW Power Leveling, service site,wotlk gold buy cheap wow gold,wow gold,world of warcraft power leveling buy wow gold

    ReplyDelete
  3. Buy World of Kung fu Gold is the chance. I always have a bad dream when my account was theft, since I buy World of Kung fu Gold ; I had not had the bad memory. At present, I want to say thanks to the people who stole my account, if he did not to do that, I would not play game, I would not have WoKf gold . Although I have little cheap World of Kung fu Gold , I will on the way of the game for long time. At one time or another, I am a pessimistic person, but when I have World of Kung fu money , it changes my attitude of life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Do you like playing in the game which you need to use requiem gold, when you do not have requiem lant, you must borrow requiem money from friends, or you buy cheap requiem lant. If you get requiem online gold, you can continue this game.

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.