What the Violence Against Protesters at the Convention Really Means → Washingtons Blog
What the Violence Against Protesters at the Convention Really Means - Washingtons Blog

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

What the Violence Against Protesters at the Convention Really Means


A classified FBI intelligence memorandum gives police detailed instructions on how to target and monitor lawful political demonstrations under the rubric of fighting terrorism. And the Joint Terrorism Task Force was involved in infiltrating, tracking and disrupting every-day Americans who disagree with the current administration's policies.

While the ACLU calls such tactics "a return to the days of J. Edgar Hoover's spying tactics", that is not an accurate description.

While Hoover's FBI had its "enemies list", and carried out numerous dirty tricks including Cointelpro, the current governmental actions are a lot worse.

For example, according to a law school professor, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 has the following consequences:

"Anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on Bush's list of 'terrorist' organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies could be declared an 'unlawful enemy combatant' and imprisoned indefinitely. That includes American citizens."
According to the New York Times:
"A dangerously broad definition of “illegal enemy combatant” in the bill could subject legal residents of the United States, as well as foreign citizens living in their own countries, to summary arrest and indefinite detention with no hope of appeal. The president could give the power to apply this label to anyone he wanted."
And according to a Yale law professor, "The [torture] legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights."

After they disappear into the black hole of enemy combatant status, they may, of course, also be tortured.

See also this FBI memo showing that peace protesters are being labeled as "terrorists" (and see this).

Is that why mass arrest facilities were set up for the Democratic National Convention, and signs on the walls of the warehouse read "Warning! Electric stun devices used in this facility" (and see this)?

Remember, the Department of Homeland Security - instead of protecting vulnerable targets from alleged terror threats - has instead randomly made up lists which include kangaroo centers, petting zoos and ice cream parlors as high-priority terrorist threats. The fact that they are now targeting reporters, children, little old ladies and skinny vegetarians is just more proof that the "war on terror" has nothing to do with terror, and everything to do with grabbing power and stifling dissent.

No comments:

Post a Comment

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.

Post a Comment