One of the Main Sources for the 9/11 Commission Report was Tortured Until He Agreed to Sign a Confession that He Was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ → Washingtons Blog
One of the Main Sources for the 9/11 Commission Report was Tortured Until He Agreed to Sign a Confession that He Was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ - Washingtons Blog

Thursday, May 14, 2009

One of the Main Sources for the 9/11 Commission Report was Tortured Until He Agreed to Sign a Confession that He Was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ


A special report from NBC news states:

The NBC News analysis shows that more than one quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al-Qaida operatives who were subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques. In fact, information derived from the interrogations is central to the Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks. The analysis also shows - and agency and commission staffers concur - there was a separate, second round of interrogations in early 2004, done specifically to answer new questions from the Commission.

9/11 Commission staffers say they "guessed" but did not know for certain that harsh techniques had been used, and they were concerned that the techniques had affected the operatives’ credibility. At least four of the operatives whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators critical information as a way to stop being "tortured." The claims came during their hearings last spring at the U.S. military facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba...

Fourteen of the highest-value detainees had their initial hearings this spring before the Pentagon’s Combatant Status Review Tribunal. The tribunal acts as sort of a grand jury, charged with determining if a detainee should be held over for trial.

Four of them said they gave information only to stop the torture. Although details were redacted in all the detainees’ testimony, the tribunal permitted the inclusion of a letter from a detainee’s father in one case, citing what he claimed was American torture of his son.

This torture only stopped when Majid agreed to sign a statement that he wasn’t even allowed to read.

5 comments:

  1. Zelikow is a joke and should never have evn been included in the whole sham 9/11 commission joke. I don't trust what he says even when he says things I agree with or want to hear. You know, Barack Obama taught me to not trust ANYTHING that ANY politician says anymore. I mean he has said so many things that I have wanted to hear for 8 years and he is retreated on just about every promise he made. He and his DOJ are going to stay Bush's course. Stevens is acquitted and Siegelman is screwed. Selective justice for all of us with selective memory. I'm a just little slow I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the real motives behind the false flag of 9/11........

    http://www.israelshamir.net/Contributors/Collateral_Damage_911.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is a petition drive going on in New York city (NYCCAN) to have a ballot initative for a new 9/11 investugation.I sent them a contribution and my prayers that they will succeed. 9/11 was an inside job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Meet the architects of 9-11:

    Cheney, Neocons, executed by Mossad

    Thank you America, for your stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am sick of telling people about obama, I was saying before he was elected that he was no different, and have been proven correct. Anyone who doesn't want to prove he had a right to be president is in my book corrupt. I'll say no more except "I told you so".

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.