Is the Well Integrity Test Failing? → Washingtons Blog
Is the Well Integrity Test Failing? - Washingtons Blog

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Is the Well Integrity Test Failing?

BP suspended the "top kill" operation for 16 hours - because, according to numerous experts, it was creating more damage to the well bore - without even telling the media, local officials or the public that it had delayed the effort until long afterwards.

BP also admitted - many days after it stopped the top kill attempt - (1) that BP had to stop because mud was leaking out below the seafloor, and (2) that capping the well from the top could blow out the whole well.

Similarly, it took more than 5 hours for BP to publicly announce the delay of the "well integrity test" after the decision to delay was made.

So BP doesn't have a great track record of promptly informing us of what is happening.

But now that the well integrity test (background here and here) is underway, can we somehow tell if it's working or not?

The government previously announced that the test would succeed if pressure in the well of 8,000-9,000 psi were observed for a sustained period. As Coast Guard admiral Thad Allen said:

We are looking for somewhere between 8,000 and 9,000 PSI inside the capping stack, which would indicate to us that the hydrocarbons are being forced up and the wellbores are being able to withstand that pressure. And that is good news.

If we are down around in the 4,000 to 5,000, 6,000 range that could potentially tell us that the hydrocarbons are being diverted someplace else, and we would have to try and assess the implications of that. And as you might imagine, there are gradations as you go up from 4,000 or 5,000 PSI up to 8,000 or 9,000. …

We will at some point try to get to 8,000 or 9,000 and sustain that for some period of time, and these will be done basically, as I said — if we have a very low pressure reading, we will try and need (ph) at least six hours of those readings to try to ensure that that is the reading. If it’s a little higher, we want to go for 24 hours. And if it’s up at 8,000 or 9,000, we would like to go 48 hours just to make sure it can sustain those pressures for that amount of time.

Images from BP's Oly Rov1 camera show the gauge for the input on the blowout preventer has been 2,000 psi for quite some time:

And the Hos ROV1 camera shows pressure of less than 1,000 bpi on another gauge:

However, as BP's Kent Wells explained earlier today:
People still looking at pressure gauges and talking about that. The pressure sensing devices are what we call pressure transducers and they send a signal to the surface which are then are converted to their actual pressure readings. So we will not have ROV cameras on pressure gauges that will show what the pressures are during the tests. The pressure gauges you see are for our hydraulic equipment or (accumulators) et cetera like that.
So the gauges don't necessarily mean anything.

The Times-Picayune has a good video explaining the process and at least some of what we're looking at:
Oil spill update: Times-Picayune reporter video July 14, 2010

Update 1: There was an apparent explosion of oil coming out of the cap. As Bloomberg noted tonight:
BP Plc said it will begin a pressure test of its gushing Gulf of Mexico well after fixing a leak that erupted while it was shutting off oil flow with a new containment cap. The leak was detected in a “choke line” leading from the stack of valves ....

The following CNN video shows what the situation is currently:

YouTube Video

Update 2: BP says it has fixed the leak, and will re-start the test.


  1. If the plan is to plug the well via the relief wells, then the purpose of the well integrity test is......?

    My guess is that the purpose is to continue to operate the well, to capture 'product' as long as possible, regardless of potential repercussions in future, such as continuing deterioration of the already-compromised well bore, potentially leading to oil and methane seepage at numerous other locations from the Gulf of Mexico sea floor, or further blowout leading to an unstoppable 'oil volcano'. This would not differ from BP's known M.O. of ignoring maintenance and safety in favor of production.

    I think someone in government has agreed to let BP continue operating the Macondo well if it passes this well integrity test, and others in government are resisting.

  2. This isn't the original article that you wrote. I saw it last night and there was a link on it at the bottom that I wanted to check out, but it's no longer there. I remember the first few words went something like "I hate to have to say this, but it looks like the cap is failing...." At the end you had something like "...wish BP had never tried to attempt this...." and there was the link. Why did you change it?

  3. Wish BP had never tried it: Here's the link I previously posted:


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.