Nobel Economist: Ban Over-the-Counter Credit Default Swaps → Washingtons Blog
Nobel Economist: Ban Over-the-Counter Credit Default Swaps - Washingtons Blog

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Nobel Economist: Ban Over-the-Counter Credit Default Swaps

Bloomberg notes:

Myron Scholes, the Nobel prize- winning economist who helped invent a model for pricing options, said regulators need to “blow up or burn” over-the-counter derivative trading markets to help solve the financial crisis.

The markets have stopped functioning and are failing to provide pricing signals, Scholes, 67, said today at a panel discussion at New York University’s Stern School of Business. Participants need a way to exit transactions and get a “fresh start,” he said.

The “solution is really to blow up or burn the OTC market, the CDSs and swaps and structured products, and let us start over,” he said, referring to credit-default swaps and other complex securities that are traded off exchanges. “One way to do that, through the auspices of regulators or the banking commissioners, is to try to close all contracts at mid-market prices.”

Scholes also recommended moving the trading of credit- default swaps, asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities to exchanges to allow for “a correct repricing” of the assets. The securities are currently traded between banks and investors, without any price disclosure on exchanges.

Time Magazine's Justin Fox notes that:

What that means, he elaborated, is that regulators should "try to close all contracts at mid-market prices" and then start up the market anew with clearer rules and shorter-duration contracts.

(Fox also notes that this is especially dramatic given that Scholes is the "intellectual godfather of the credit default swap").

I agree with Scholes.

Legally, you can cancel CDS based upon fraud or mistake. Or you can reform (that is, modify) CDS if one party to the contract was mistaken about what he was getting into. The government must use its power to do so, or the economy will continue to go down the tubes.


  1. CDS's simply need to go , without them this housing bubble would not have been built and the castle wall would not be crumbling. To get a functioning market with a normal pattern would be a good thing.

  2. However rotten or crooked they are (cds's) how do you unwind them fairly? And how much moral hazard will remain on the one side and balance sheet destruction on the other if we just blow up the contracts.
    What an opening for corruption, and then
    where is fairness?
    It is only the mercy of the victor that can grant release with honour, face saved for both parties and stability for the wider economy.
    Who has such mercy? What corporation has written such mercy into their mission statements?

  3. There is no way to unwind them. The amount it would take to buy them all is estimated at a quadrillion dollars, more money then exists in the world. The only possible solution is since they represent nothing in the real world and are really just betting slips you simply throw them away.
    Yep , lots of people including pension funds will be hurt but not as bad as they will hurt if we don't do it.

  4. SWPPP is for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans. All construction sites in the US are required to have a plan. This plan is used to keep polluted water from going down the drain during a rainstorm. The water becomes poluted because the construction job removes vegetation.Then the storm picks up the loose dirt and carries the dirt away. This polutes the water systems.

  5. The big problem with CDSs is that they have become a major tool for criminalization of banking processes. Wall Street banks operate like this was Russia -- tearing into any bribeable target. Google [ jefferson county cds chase sec ]. JPMC is worse than any living Russian oligarch.


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.