Banking Industry Insiders Call for Breaking Up Giant Banks → Washingtons Blog
Banking Industry Insiders Call for Breaking Up Giant Banks - Washingtons Blog

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Banking Industry Insiders Call for Breaking Up Giant Banks

Virtually all independent financial experts are demanding that the too big to fail banks be broken up, including:

  • Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush, and Dean and professor of finance and economics at Columbia Business School, R. Glenn Hubbard
  • The leading monetary economist and co-author with Milton Friedman of the leading treatise on the Great Depression, Anna Schwartz
  • Economics professor and senior regulator during the S & L crisis, William K. Black
  • Professor of entrepreneurship and finance at the Chicago Booth School of Business, Luigi Zingales

In addition, many bank regulators say that we need to break up the too big to fails, including:

(And 5 former Secretaries of the Treasury agree with Volcker.)

Even the Bank of International Settlements - the "Central Banks' Central Bank" - has slammed too big to fail. As summarized by the Financial Times:

The report was particularly scathing in its assessment of governments’ attempts to clean up their banks. “The reluctance of officials to quickly clean up the banks, many of which are now owned in large part by governments, may well delay recovery,” it said, adding that government interventions had ingrained the belief that some banks were too big or too interconnected to fail.

This was dangerous because it reinforced the risks of moral hazard which might lead to an even bigger financial crisis in future.

And many bankers are for breaking up the giants as well.

For example, the President of the Independent Community Bankers of America, a Washington-based trade group with about 5,000 members, is calling for the break up of the TBTFs.

As is former investment banker, Philip Augar.

But as a great new blog shows, even bankers within the mega-banks are themselves calling for them to be broken up.

On April 2nd, The Fourteenth Banker - a blog run by bankers within the big banks for bankers within the big banks - called for a campaign by bankers to demand that the mega-banks be broken up:

If you work for a big bank, ... what would happen if the bank is broken up? Well, that would be very complicated financially, but the result is probably not that hard to predict. Most obviously, deposits would need to stay in the core bank. What would this mean for the way the core bank works to succeed, the non core products it distributes, and the way its deposits fund investments compared to the way things are now? I suspect less net deposits taken out of the community and more loans made in the community.

The different businesses would be spun off to shareholders or sold. Watch the ball here. The Investment Bank is going to want and need a disproportionate share of the capital if they want to maintain their lifestyles. Absent the cloak of respectability the bank provides, they are going to want to be the next Goldman. Watch the ball. Capital is critical. In fact, as a sort of mind game, I wonder how much capital regulators or the SEC or Moody’s would require? What would that leave for the bank?


What would the core banks funding cost be if it did not have to worry about the high leverage, senior unsecured bonds and the CDS spreads needed to support those? Maybe the core bank could both make more money and provide better deposit rates to savers. I don’t know. Where is the Congress on this? Why not look at the upside instead of just the fear of systemic risk, important as that is?

Studies consistently cite that the efficiencies (economies) of scale end and $100B or so. If that is the case, does that not make the multi million dollar men at the top of the pyramid the actual problem? Money is diverted from the branch to the Executive ranks, Private Wealth, and the Investment Bank. It is reverse Robin Hood.

So what do the majority of bankers have to fear from a break up? Nothing. It would bring management closer to the customer and the employee, create a better customer experience, more equitable pay, better teamwork, and a return to values oriented banking.

Given this common sense, all branch based folks at the thousand and thousands of branches should write their congressmen and women and Senators and ask for the passage of strong TBTF legislation that would restore dignity to their profession. Let Private Wealth and the I-Bank float on their own. If you are a shareholder in your 401K or otherwise, you will still get a piece of that action. The value of the parts is generally greater than the value of the whole anyway. It is a win-win-win except in the Executive wing and on Wall Street, which is out of touch with Main Street anyway.

Maybe we should organize a million banker March in DC for financial reform. Too bold?

No, not too bold ... much needed.


  1. Actually, you just need to decide that they're not too big to fail, and then make clear they will -- fail that is -- if it comes to that. Meaning shareholders wiped out, management wiped away, creditors dealt with in bankruptcy court.

  2. I have taken to calling Obama, O'Bushma because to me he is so much like a fat cat republican.

    I am amazed that people are still falling for the hypnotic mantra, I mean the campaign slogan of 'hope and change'. I am even more amazed that people still fall for the kabuki theater show that the Democrats & Republicans put on that they really are opposed to each other. When in reality it seems they really work together very closely in smoke filled back rooms.

    America is increasingly like a feudal nation now where the serfs, I mean average Americans are increasingly landless, homeless and drowning in debt. And it does not seem that anyone has the courage to stand up to the giant monopolies, oligarchies, cartels or the military instrial complex or either political party.

  3. Another great idea promoted by all the best minds in and out of the banking business.

    Something this horrific will never happen.

    Just a bunch of hippie liberal tree huggers. Big is vital to the size- obsessed USA. Don't believe me, just look at a pick up truck! The smallest iterations appear to be able to pull a semi- trailer.

    The Upper Echelon of the US government LOVES its big banks and will never let them go! They are the training ground for future generations of establishment economic expertise. Where do you think this expertise will come from if not from big banks like Citigruppe?

    The Whole Earth Catalog?


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.