Saturday, April 3, 2010
Head of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service: No Loss of Intelligence Since We Stopped Waterboarding
Two stories this week prove once again that torture is unnecessary and counter-productive for obtaining intelligence.
First, according to the Washington Post, the CIA's top spy - Michael Sulick, head of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service - said :
The spy agency has seen no fall-off in intelligence since waterboarding was banned by the Obama administration. "I don’t think we’ve suffered at all from an intelligence standpoint."Second, after repeatedly torturing a supposed "senior Al Qaeda" leader and key player in 9/11, the government now admits that he had no knowledge or role in 9/11, and wasn't even affiliated with Al Qaeda.
1 comment:
→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).
→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).
→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:
-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over
-- Comments that explicitly call for violence
→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.
Posts
The question to be asked is did they learn new things about torture by torturing? Another is did this torture demonstrate that psychological terror within the ranks of the USA is effective as a tool to make men brutal? Obviously torture was not intended for actionable information.
ReplyDeleteSo then we must unveil the true reason for torture. Of course, since 9/11, Americans have lived in psychological terror anyhow, thanks to PNAC.