Fire Threatens Plutonium and Uranium Release at Los Alamos National Laboratory → Washingtons Blog
Fire Threatens Plutonium and Uranium Release at Los Alamos National Laboratory - Washingtons Blog

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Fire Threatens Plutonium and Uranium Release at Los Alamos National Laboratory

A raging wildfire is threatening to engulf the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Los Alamos has likely tested more nuclear weapons than any other facility in the world.

As if that weren't bad enough, AP notes:

The anti-nuclear watchdog group Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, however, said the fire appeared to be about 3 1/2 miles from a dumpsite where as many as 30,000 55-gallon drums of plutonium-contaminated waste were stored in fabric tents above ground. The group said the drums were awaiting transport to a low-level radiation dump site in southern New Mexico.

Lab spokesman Steve Sandoval declined to confirm that there were any such drums currently on the property.

Later, Los Alamos confirmed the allegation:

Lab officials at first declined to confirm that such drums were on the property, but in a statement early Tuesday, lab spokeswoman Lisa Rosendorf said such drums are stored in a section of the complex known as Area G. She said the drums contain cleanup from Cold War-era waste that the lab sends away in weekly shipments to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

She said the drums were on a paved area with few trees nearby and would be safe even if a fire reached the storage area. Officials have said it is miles from the flames.

The Los Alamos Study Group alleges that the waste is not all from the Cold War, because the facility is cranking out more nuclear weapons than ever.

The lab has called in a special team to test plutonium and uranium levels in the air as a "precaution".

One area within the Los Alamos complex already suffered a temporary fire, which was doused. As Reuters reports:

A small offshoot of the blaze jumped State Highway 4 onto the lab grounds on Monday, burning about an acre (0.4 hectare) of property before it was extinguished about two hours later.

The Wall Street Journal notes that the surrounding canyons also contain radioactivity from past bomb tests:

Authorities also are worried about potential radiation releases from nearby canyons. Radioactive material from nuclear tests was deposited in the canyons decades ago, and if trees in those canyons go up in flames, they could release radiation into the air, said Rita Bates, an air-quality official with the New Mexico Environment Department. That could raise the "potential for that smoke to affect people's health," she added.

And see this.


  1. The lab has called in a special team to test plutonium and uranium levels in the air as a "precaution".

    A more likely reason for the testing is to be able to spin and deflect any negative findings, as local activists have learned to do their independent testing.

    Greg Mello of stated to Amy Goodman on Democracy Now [ ]
    "There's a serious trust deficit. You really can't take anything that the laboratory says at face value. ...They'd be the last to tell you if there was a serious problem."

    The late Stewart Udall expressed it thus:

    “There is nothing comparable in our history to the deceit and the lying that took place as a matter of official Government policy in order to protect this [the nuclear arms] industry."

  2. Fire is plasma.It is more than a hot neutral collection of gases. Ionization can reach interesting levels and cause fire to assume the Red Cow of Australian novel fame.

    All radioactive dating is based on assumptions that are now being questioned as the rate varies slightly with distance from the Sun! For once, this is reassuring: most of the radioactive isotopes can be affected if the fires are hot enough. The likelihood is that there will be a reduction in overall radioactivity. The downside is that it will be propelled kilometres into the air and may be moved several states away.

    Anyone worried should migrate to the Southern hemisphere, while we still do not check folks for radiation load at our airports in Australia etc.

    Think I am joking?


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.