The Citigroup Deal is Lousy for America → Washingtons Blog
The Citigroup Deal is Lousy for America - Washingtons Blog

Monday, November 24, 2008

The Citigroup Deal is Lousy for America


The verdict on the Citigroup bailout is pretty much unanimous: its a terrible deal for America.

  • Nobel economist Paul Krugman:

"A bailout was necessary — but this bailout is an outrage: a lousy deal for the taxpayers, no accountability for management, and just to make things perfect, quite possibly inadequate, so that Citi will be back for more. Amazing how much damage the lame ducks can do in the time remaining."

  • Economist and former labor secretary Robert Reich:

"This is not a particularly good deal for American taxpayers, but it is a marvelous deal for Citi. In return for all the cash and guarantees they are giving away, taxpayers will get only $27 billion of preferred shares paying an 8 percent dividend. No other strings are attached. The senior executives of Citi, including those who have served at the highest levels in the US government, have done their jobs exceedingly well. The American public, including the media, have not the slightest clue what just happened."
"So far I'm not impressed"
"Note key element of the deal is that the Federal government will guarantee $300 billion of Citi assets, a much bigger number than had been leaked earlier, with a rather convoluted loss-sharing arrangement, but the bottom line is that Citi is at risk for at most $40 billion. Citi also gets a $20 billion equity injection, on slightly more onerous terms than the initial TARP investments, but still more favorable than Warren Buffett's investment in Goldman. Oh, and it appears there will be NO management changes."
  • Washington Post financial writer James Kwak:
"The third goal should have been getting a good deal for the U.S. taxpayer, but instead Citi got the same generous terms as the original recapitalization. 8% is still less than the 10% Buffett got from Goldman; a cap on dividends is a nice touch but shouldn’t affect the value of equity any. By refusing to ask for convertible shares, the government achieved its goal of not diluting shareholders and limiting its influence over the bank. And an exercise price of $10.61 for the warrants? It is justified as the average closing price for the preceding 20 days, but basically that amounts to substituting what people really would like to believe the stock is worth for what it really is worth ($3.77)."

5 comments:

  1. What we're seeing is the Hole in the Wall Street Gang stealing as much as possible before their puppet president has to leave office, no doubt with bags of taxpayer money concealed under his poncho.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen to that, Joseph Hutchison. And no one is stopping them so they're in on it too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Given that C's market cap on Friday was about $20.7 billion, how come the Government didn't just pony up the extra $0.7b and buy the thing outright?

    They've got about as much chance of getting an 8% dividend on the new, dilutive stock as I have of knocking the moon out of the sky with a fart.

    This, plus AIG, FNM and FRE, rank up there with Buffet's stake in Goldman Sachs as the dumbest investments of the century.

    Lenin must be giggling...

    Cheerio


    GT
    GT's Market Rant

    ReplyDelete
  5. Citi just got an injection to buy its owns stocks and raise the various markets that comprise it.

    Smoke and mirrors.

    Don't buy stocks or anything else you can't afford.

    Live within your means and starve the parasites.

    ReplyDelete

→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.