Hit the Corporate Big-Wigs Who Commited Fraud With Huge Fines to Reduce Future Fraud → Washingtons Blog
Hit the Corporate Big-Wigs Who Commited Fraud With Huge Fines to Reduce Future Fraud - Washingtons Blog

Monday, June 22, 2009

Hit the Corporate Big-Wigs Who Commited Fraud With Huge Fines to Reduce Future Fraud

Huffington Post notes:

A state judge on Thursday ordered former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy to pay nearly $2.9 billion to shareholders who sued over a massive accounting fraud that nearly sent the rehabilitation chain into bankruptcy.

The judgment is very good for America.


Because the current incentive for high-level corporate people is to commit fraud. Even if they are caught and go to jail, they'll be rich when they get out.

Hitting the crooks in the wallet is the only thing which will motivate people not to rip off their shareholders, the taxpayers and the American treasury.

As Paul Volcker says, the incentive systems at financial firms are broken.

Hitting wrongdoers with big fines will help fix them.

As William K. Black - the senior regulator during the S&L crisis, and an Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri said:

Failing bankers ha[ve] perverse incentives to "live large" and cause larger losses to the FDIC and taxpayers.
And Nobel prize-winning economist George Akerlof co-wrote a paper in 1993 describing the reasons for financial meltdowns:

Financial crises in the 1980s, like the Texas real estate bust, had been the result of private investors taking advantage of the government. The investors had borrowed huge amounts of money, made big profits when times were good and then left the government holding the bag for their eventual (and predictable) losses.

In a word, the investors looted. Someone trying to make an honest profit, Professors Akerlof and Romer [co-author and himself a leading expert on economic growth] said, would have operated in a completely different manner. The investors displayed a “total disregard for even the most basic principles of lending,” failing to verify standard information about their borrowers or, in some cases, even to ask for that information.

The investors “acted as if future losses were somebody else’s problem,” the economists wrote. “They were right.”

If enough people like the HealthSouth CEO are hit with multi-billion dollar fines for fraud, future losses will not be somebody else's problems, but their own.

That would make the game of financial fraud a lot less profitable, and so undermine much of the motivation of corporate big-wigs to commit fraud. And - given that Black says that massive fraud is what caused the economic crisis - that in turn would save the taxpayers from having to fund many billions in bailouts . . .


  1. Kind of like closing the barn door after the horse is gone and running. Where did the stinkers get the ability to do there stinking? Where do these fines being paid ultimately end up? How is it even possible for a government to tax a people for something as sideways as a bail out. Or tax an individual citizen at all? This may appear to be "good news" on the surface. The undercurrents how ever are powerful, entrenched and established Appearances observed on the surface is rather meaningless and insignificant. What makes all this nonsense possible and unavoidable is very simple. We don't have our own money. The government doesn't have any money. The money has us.

  2. How do all of these sociopaths get into power in the first place? Because good and normal average people let them -- it's partially our fault for allowing them to keep doing what they do. This happens at my workplace too and everywhere else you look corruption and bullies rule.

  3. Interesting research on the Treasury. http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/06/still-researching-corruption-at.html


→ Thank you for contributing to the conversation by commenting. We try to read all of the comments (but don't always have the time).

→ If you write a long comment, please use paragraph breaks. Otherwise, no one will read it. Many people still won't read it, so shorter is usually better (but it's your choice).

→ The following types of comments will be deleted if we happen to see them:

-- Comments that criticize any class of people as a whole, especially when based on an attribute they don't have control over

-- Comments that explicitly call for violence

→ Because we do not read all of the comments, I am not responsible for any unlawful or distasteful comments.